Paper · 2011 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Growth and yield of clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) grown on light-textured soils with foliar application of fermented panchgavya.

R. N. Kumawat; S. S. Mahajan; R. S. Mertia

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field study was carried out in rainy (kharif ) season of 2006 and 2007 to examine the effect of foliar application of panchgavya plus leaf extracts of neem (Azadirachta indica A, Juss.), datura (Datura metel L.) and tumba (Citrullus colocynthis L.) in 1:1 ratio on dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, yield and yield attributes of clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L. Taub.) grown on light-textured soils under irrigated conditions. The results showed that the foliar application of neem plus panchgavya increased dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, yield and yield attributes significantly compared to control and sole application of panchgavya. Application of neem plus panchgavya recorded higher grain (34%), straw (21%) and biological yield (25%) compared to control. Application of the sources both at branching plus flowering recorded significantly higher dry matter as well as nutrient uptake, yield and yield attributes over the application either at branching or flowering. The grain, straw and biological yields recorded 26, 22 and 23% increase, respectively with dual application of sources both at branching and flowering compared to spray at flowering only.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem plus panchgavya significantly increased dry matter and nutrient uptake versus control and panchgavya alone.

Treatment
foliar application of neem plus panchgavyae0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control and sole application of panchgavyae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of neem plus panchgavya increased dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, yield and yield attributes significantly compared to control and sole application of panchgavya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem plus panchgavya raised grain yield by 34% versus control.

Treatment
neem plus panchgavyae0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
34%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of neem plus panchgavya recorded higher grain (34%), straw (21%) and biological yield (25%) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem plus panchgavya raised straw yield by 21% versus control.

Treatment
neem plus panchgavyae0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
highere0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of neem plus panchgavya recorded higher grain (34%), straw (21%) and biological yield (25%) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem plus panchgavya raised biological yield by 25% versus control.

Treatment
neem plus panchgavyae0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of neem plus panchgavya recorded higher grain (34%), straw (21%) and biological yield (25%) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applications at branching and flowering significantly increased dry matter, nutrient uptake, yield, and yield attributes versus one application.

Treatment
both at branching plus floweringe0
Outcome
dry matter as well as nutrient uptake, yield and yield attributese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
either at branching or floweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of the sources both at branching plus flowering recorded significantly higher dry matter as well as nutrient uptake, yield and yield attributes over the application either at branching or flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual application increased grain yield by 26% versus flowering spray only.

Treatment
dual application of sources both at branching and floweringe0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasee0
Value
26e0
Comparator
spray at flowering onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain, straw and biological yields recorded 26, 22 and 23% increase, respectively with dual application of sources both at branching and flowering compared to spray at flowering only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual application increased straw yield by 22% versus flowering spray only.

Treatment
dual application of sources both at branching and floweringe0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
22e0
Comparator
spray at flowering onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain, straw and biological yields recorded 26, 22 and 23% increase, respectively with dual application of sources both at branching and flowering compared to spray at flowering only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual application increased biological yield by 23% versus flowering spray only.

Treatment
dual application of sources both at branching and floweringe0
Outcome
biological yieldse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
spray at flowering onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain, straw and biological yields recorded 26, 22 and 23% increase, respectively with dual application of sources both at branching and flowering compared to spray at flowering only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–57 · show in text ↑

botanical · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

stage · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.