Abstract
Forage yields of Dominant winter rye clipped in the spring in a series of 12 treatments ranged from about [Formula: see text] ton to over 2 tons of D.M./acre. Clipping reduced grain yields by at least 10% and several clipping treatments prevented any grain production. The lowest forage yield and the least reduction in grain yield resulted from a single early clipping. Forage yield increased by [Formula: see text] ton D.M./acre for each week’s delay in clipping with correspondingly greater reduction in grain yield. Crude protein content of the forage decreased from 25 to 13% in a 3-week period. Increased forage yields were obtained when the interval between repeated clipping was increased from 1 to 2, 3, or 4 weeks. Protein levels were maintained at over 25% for 3 months with weekly clipping. Height, maturity, and ergot incidence were adversely affected by all clipping treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Clipped Dominant winter rye forage yield ranged from about an illegible quantity to over 2 tons dry matter per acre.
- Taxon
- winter rye
Secale cerealee0 - Material
- Dominante0
- Outcome
- Forage yieldse0
- Value
- over 2 tons of D.M./acree0
- Qualifier
- ranged from about [Formula: see text] tone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Forage yields of Dominant winter rye clipped in the spring in a series of 12 treatments ranged from about [Formula: see text] ton to over 2 tons of D.M./acre.”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring clipping reduced winter rye grain yields by at least 10%.
- Taxon
- winter ryeSecale cerealet0
- Treatment
- Clippinge0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- at least 10%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Clipping reduced grain yields by at least 10%”
t0“WINTER RYE”
Claim · model-written summary
Several clipping treatments prevented grain production.
- Taxon
- winter ryeSecale cerealet0
- Treatment
- clipping treatmentse0
- Outcome
- any grain productione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“several clipping treatments prevented any grain production.”
t0“WINTER RYE”
Claim · model-written summary
A single early clipping gave the lowest forage yield and smallest grain-yield reduction.
- Taxon
- winter ryeSecale cerealet0
- Treatment
- single early clippinge0
- Outcome
- forage yielde0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest forage yield and the least reduction in grain yield resulted from a single early clipping.”
t0“WINTER RYE”
Claim · model-written summary
Delaying clipping by each week increased forage yield by an illegible amount per acre.
- Taxon
- winter ryeSecale cerealet0
- Treatment
- each week’s delay in clippinge0
- Outcome
- Forage yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- [Formula: see text] ton D.M./acree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Forage yield increased by [Formula: see text] ton D.M./acre for each week’s delay in clipping”
t0“WINTER RYE”
Claim · model-written summary
Later clipping caused correspondingly greater grain-yield reduction.
- Taxon
- winter ryeSecale cerealet0
- Treatment
- each week’s delay in clippinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- greater reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“for each week’s delay in clipping with correspondingly greater reduction in grain yield.”
t0“WINTER RYE”
Claim · model-written summary
Forage crude protein content fell from 25 to 13% over three weeks.
- Taxon
- winter ryeSecale cerealet0
- Outcome
- Crude protein content of the foragee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 25 to 13%e0
- Qualifier
- 3-week periode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Crude protein content of the forage decreased from 25 to 13% in a 3-week period.”
t0“WINTER RYE”
Claim · model-written summary
Longer intervals between repeated clipping increased forage yields.
- Taxon
- winter ryeSecale cerealet0
- Treatment
- interval between repeated clipping was increased from 1 to 2, 3, or 4 weekse0
- Outcome
- forage yieldse0
- Direction
- Increasede0
- Comparator
- 1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Increased forage yields were obtained when the interval between repeated clipping was increased from 1 to 2, 3, or 4 weeks.”
t0“WINTER RYE”
Claim · model-written summary
Weekly clipping maintained forage protein levels over 25% for three months.
- Taxon
- winter ryeSecale cerealet0
- Treatment
- weekly clippinge0
- Outcome
- Protein levelse0
- Direction
- maintainede0
- Value
- over 25%e0
- Qualifier
- 3 monthse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Protein levels were maintained at over 25% for 3 months with weekly clipping.”
t0“WINTER RYE”
Claim · model-written summary
All clipping treatments adversely affected rye height and maturity.
- Taxon
- winter ryeSecale cerealet0
- Treatment
- all clipping treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Height, maturitye0
- Direction
- adversely affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Height, maturity, and ergot incidence were adversely affected by all clipping treatments.”
t0“WINTER RYE”
Claim · model-written summary
All clipping treatments adversely affected ergot incidence.
- Taxon
- winter ryeSecale cerealet0
- Treatment
- all clipping treatmentse0
- Outcome
- ergot incidencee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Height, maturity, and ergot incidence were adversely affected by all clipping treatments.”
t0“WINTER RYE”
The same questions in other papers
mechanical · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.