Abstract
Triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) is being used for supplemental winter grazing and has potential to be a grain crop in the southeastern U. S. There is little information on the effect of cultural practices on the agronomic performance of triticale. An experiment was conducted on a Decatur silty clay loam soil ( Rhodic Paleudult ) to study the effects of two row spacings (12.5 and 25 cm) and three seeding rates (50, 75, and 100 kg/ha) for two growing seasons on the performance of a triticale cultivar, 6TA 131, in comparison with commonly grown Wrens Abruzzi rye ( Secale cereale L.) and Arthur 71 wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). Differences in forage yields due to row spacing and seeding rates of triticale, wheat, and rye were highly significant. The optimum rate of seeding for triticale appears to be 75 and 100 kg/ha for grain and forage production, respectively, when planted at 12.5‐cm row spacings. In wheat and rye, seeding rates of 75 and 100 kg/ha produced significantly more forage, whereas seeding at 50 kg /ha was adequate for grain yields. Clipping effects on triticale and wheat grain yields were inconsistent, but reduced rye yield considerably.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing and seeding rate significantly affected forage yield of triticale.
- Taxon
- triticale
×Triticosecalee0 - Treatment
- row spacing and seeding ratese1
- Outcome
- forage yieldse1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) is being used for supplemental winter grazing”
e1“Differences in forage yields due to row spacing and seeding rates of triticale, wheat, and rye were highly significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing and seeding rate significantly affected forage yield of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume3 - Treatment
- row spacing and seeding ratese1
- Outcome
- forage yieldse1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Differences in forage yields due to row spacing and seeding rates of triticale, wheat, and rye were highly significant”
e3“In wheat and rye”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing and seeding rate significantly affected forage yield of rye.
- Taxon
- rye
Secale cerealee3 - Treatment
- row spacing and seeding ratese1
- Outcome
- forage yieldse1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Differences in forage yields due to row spacing and seeding rates of triticale, wheat, and rye were highly significant”
e3“In wheat and rye”
Claim · model-written summary
The optimum seeding rate for triticale appears to be 75 and 100 kg/ha for grain and forage production, respectively.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Outcome
- optimum rate of seedinge2
- Value
- 75 and 100 kg/hae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) is being used for supplemental winter grazing”
e2“The optimum rate of seeding for triticale appears to be 75 and 100 kg/ha for grain and forage production, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Seeding rates of 75 and 100 kg/ha produced significantly more forage in wheat than seeding at 50 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume3
- Treatment
- seeding rates of 75 and 100 kg/hae3
- Outcome
- foragee3
- Direction
- moree3
- Comparator
- seeding at 50 kg /hae4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“In wheat and rye, seeding rates of 75 and 100 kg/ha produced significantly more forage”
e4“whereas seeding at 50 kg /ha was adequate for grain yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Seeding rates of 75 and 100 kg/ha produced significantly more forage in rye than seeding at 50 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- ryeSecale cerealee3
- Treatment
- seeding rates of 75 and 100 kg/hae3
- Outcome
- foragee3
- Direction
- moree3
- Comparator
- seeding at 50 kg /hae4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“In wheat and rye, seeding rates of 75 and 100 kg/ha produced significantly more forage”
e4“whereas seeding at 50 kg /ha was adequate for grain yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Seeding at 50 kg/ha was adequate for grain yield of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume3
- Treatment
- seeding at 50 kg /hae4
- Outcome
- grain yieldse4
- Qualifier
- adequatee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“In wheat and rye”
e4“whereas seeding at 50 kg /ha was adequate for grain yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Seeding at 50 kg/ha was adequate for grain yield of rye.
- Taxon
- ryeSecale cerealee3
- Treatment
- seeding at 50 kg /hae4
- Outcome
- grain yieldse4
- Qualifier
- adequatee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“In wheat and rye”
e4“whereas seeding at 50 kg /ha was adequate for grain yields”
Claim · model-written summary
Clipping effects on triticale grain yield were inconsistent.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee5
- Treatment
- Clippinge5
- Outcome
- grain yieldse5
- Qualifier
- inconsistente5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) is being used for supplemental winter grazing”
e5“Clipping effects on triticale and wheat grain yields were inconsistent”
Claim · model-written summary
Clipping effects on wheat grain yield were inconsistent.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume3
- Treatment
- Clippinge5
- Outcome
- grain yieldse5
- Qualifier
- inconsistente5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“In wheat and rye”
e5“Clipping effects on triticale and wheat grain yields were inconsistent”
Claim · model-written summary
Clipping reduced rye yield considerably.
- Taxon
- ryeSecale cerealee3
- Treatment
- Clippinge5
- Outcome
- rye yielde6
- Direction
- reducede6
- Qualifier
- considerablye6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“In wheat and rye”
e5“Clipping effects on triticale and wheat grain yields were inconsistent”
e6“but reduced rye yield considerably”
The same questions in other papers
mechanical · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
density · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
494 papers more in this group
See all 498 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.