Paper · 1968 · Agronomy Journal

Influence of Fungicides, Herbicides and Combinations on Emergence and Seedling Growth of Cotton1

A. J. Kappelman; G. A. Buchanan

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effect of selected fungicides, herbicides, and fungicide‐herbicide combinations on emergence and seedling growth of cotton was studied on four soils in the greenhouse. Herbicides used as preplant, preemergence, and postemergence treatments all reduced seedling growth. Soil fungicides increased emergence and early growth of cotton plants; however, this increase was not evident in 7‐week‐old plants. Both emergence values and seedling growth were reduced by various pesticide combinations. Plants from plots treated with Lanstan and then treated preemergence with prometryne emerged faster than plants treated with other combinations. However, Lanstanfluometuron treated plants were taller at 2 weeks than plants receiving other treatment combinations. Interactions were also measured between soils and all chemicals.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides applied before planting, before emergence, or after emergence reduced cotton seedling growth.

Treatment
Herbicidese0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicides used as preplant, preemergence, and postemergence treatments all reduced seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fungicides increased cotton emergence.

Treatment
Soil fungicidese0
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil fungicides increased emergence and early growth of cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fungicides increased early cotton growth.

Treatment
Soil fungicidese0
Outcome
early growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil fungicides increased emergence and early growth of cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide-associated increase was no longer evident in seven-week-old cotton plants.

Organ / stage
7‐week‐old plantse0
Treatment
Soil fungicidese1
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
not evidente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“however, this increase was not evident in 7‐week‐old plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil fungicides increased emergence and early growth of cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Various pesticide combinations reduced cotton emergence.

Treatment
various pesticide combinationse0
Outcome
emergence valuese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both emergence values and seedling growth were reduced by various pesticide combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Various pesticide combinations reduced cotton seedling growth.

Treatment
various pesticide combinationse0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both emergence values and seedling growth were reduced by various pesticide combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lanstan followed by preemergence prometryne accelerated emergence relative to other combinations.

Treatment
Lanstan and then treated preemergence with prometrynee0
Outcome
emergede0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
other combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants from plots treated with Lanstan and then treated preemergence with prometryne emerged faster than plants treated with other combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lanstanfluometuron-treated plants were taller at two weeks than plants given other combinations.

Treatment
Lanstanfluometurone0
Outcome
tallere0
Direction
tallere0
Qualifier
at 2 weekse0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lanstanfluometuron treated plants were taller at 2 weeks than plants receiving other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soils interacted with all tested chemicals in their effects on cotton.

Treatment
all chemicalse0
Outcome
Interactionse0
Setting
soilse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interactions were also measured between soils and all chemicals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑

insecticide · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

18 papers: 7 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

herbicide · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

35 papers: 12 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fungicide · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.