Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

NITROGEN FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT FOR IMPROVED GRAIN QUALITY AND YIELD IN WINTER WHEAT IN OKLAHOMA

Yesuf Assen Mohammed; Jonathan Kelly; Bee Khim Chim; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
62
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract From 2002 to date, a long-term field experiment has been conducted at Lake Carl Blackwell, Oklahoma, with different rates and times of nitrogen (N) fertilizer application to determine their effect on grain yield, protein and N uptake of winter wheat. Trend analysis for N rates (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg N ha−1) and orthogonal contrasts for different application times (pre-plant, top-dressed in February and March) were performed. With increasing fertilizer N, wheat grain yield and protein content increased from 2110 kg ha−1 to 6783 kg ha−1 and from 8.96 to 17.19%, respectively. For grain yield, protein, and N use efficiency, split applications of N fertilizer were much more efficient than applying all N pre-plant. Large differences in grain yields were noted for different years at the same N rate (range exceeded 5.0 Mg ha−1) and that illustrated the need for making within-year-specific N rate recommendations. Keywords: nitrogennitrogen uptakeproteintime of applicationwinter wheat

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertilizer N raised winter wheat grain yield from 2110 to 6783 kg/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
increasing fertilizer Ne2
Outcome
wheat grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
2110 kg ha−1 to 6783 kg ha−1e2
Setting
Lake Carl Blackwell, Oklahomae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lake Carl Blackwell, Oklahoma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield, protein and N uptake of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–258 · show in text ↑
e2

“With increasing fertilizer N, wheat grain yield and protein content increased from 2110 kg ha−1 to 6783 kg ha−1 and from 8.96 to 17.19%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertilizer N raised winter wheat protein content from 8.96% to 17.19%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
increasing fertilizer Ne2
Outcome
protein contente2
Direction
increasede2
Value
8.96 to 17.19%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lake Carl Blackwell, Oklahoma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield, protein and N uptake of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–258 · show in text ↑
e2

“With increasing fertilizer N, wheat grain yield and protein content increased from 2110 kg ha−1 to 6783 kg ha−1 and from 8.96 to 17.19%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split N applications were more efficient than applying all N pre-plant for grain yield, protein and N use efficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
split applications of N fertilizere3
Outcome
grain yield, protein, and N use efficiencye3
Direction
more efficiente3
Comparator
applying all N pre-plante3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“grain yield, protein and N uptake of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–258 · show in text ↑
e3

“For grain yield, protein, and N use efficiency, split applications of N fertilizer were much more efficient than applying all N pre-plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–731 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yields at the same N rate differed among years by more than 5.0 Mg/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
grain yieldse4
Value
5.0 Mg ha−1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“grain yield, protein and N uptake of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–258 · show in text ↑
e4

“Large differences in grain yields were noted for different years at the same N rate (range exceeded 5.0 Mg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–845 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend within-year-specific N rate recommendations for winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
within-year-specific N rate recommendationse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“grain yield, protein and N uptake of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–258 · show in text ↑
e5

“the need for making within-year-specific N rate recommendations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–930 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.