Paper · 1982 · Crop Science

Catechin and Condensed Tannin Contents of Leaves and Bolls of Cotton in Relation to Irrigation and Boll Load1

Gene Guinn; Marie P. Eidenbock

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Water deficit has been shown to decrease insect numbers in cotton, especially Lygus hesperus Knight and Heliothis spp. Condensed tannins have antibiotic activity and have been shown to decrease the feeding, growth rate, and survival of Heliothis spp. Condensed tannins are produced from various catechins, and their concentration has been reported to increase in some plants with various stresses, including drought. Therefore, we measured the catechin and tannin contents of leaves and 4‐day‐old bolls in cotton during irrigation cycles and after the final irrigation. We obtained no evidence that water deficit increases the concentration of extractable catechin or tannin in leaves or bolls. Therefore, other factors must be responsible for the suppression of insect activity in dryland cotton or in irrigated cotton during the dry part of the irrigation cycle. Partial defruiting did increase the catechin and tannin contents of leaves and bolls, suggesting that loss of fruit may cause biochemical changes that contribute to insect resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit did not increase the concentration of extractable catechin or tannin in cotton leaves or bolls.

Organ / stage
leaves or bollse1
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
concentration of extractable catechin or tannine1
Direction
increasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Leaves and Bolls of Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–68 · show in text ↑
e1

“We obtained no evidence that water deficit increases the concentration of extractable catechin or tannin in leaves or bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial defruiting increased catechin and tannin contents of cotton leaves and bolls.

Organ / stage
leaves and bollse2
Treatment
Partial defruitinge2
Outcome
catechin and tannin contentse2
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Leaves and Bolls of Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–68 · show in text ↑
e2

“Partial defruiting did increase the catechin and tannin contents of leaves and bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–949 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Loss of fruit may cause biochemical changes in cotton that contribute to insect resistance.

Outcome
insect resistancee3
Qualifier
loss of fruit may cause biochemical changese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Leaves and Bolls of Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–68 · show in text ↑
e3

“suggesting that loss of fruit may cause biochemical changes that contribute to insect resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1047 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Other factors, not catechin or tannin, are responsible for the suppression of insect activity in cotton.

Outcome
suppression of insect activitye4
Qualifier
other factorse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“other factors must be responsible for the suppression of insect activity in dryland cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–796 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: phytochemicals · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.