Paper · 2013 · Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais

Plant extracts for controlling the post-harvest anthracnose of banana fruit

M.E.S. Cruz; K.R.F. Schwan-Estrada; E. Clemente; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In banana, fruit rot is incited by Colletotrichum musae which has been the most serious post-harvest disease of immature and mature fruit. The usual control by fungicides prohibited in many countries reduces their commercial value. Therefore, two experiments were conducted to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of alternative products to the synthetic fungicides. First, berries naturally infected by anthracnose were immersed into Azadirachta indica and citric extracts at 2 and 4% (v/v) for 3 minutes and stored for 11 days under environmental conditions. Next, other berries were immersed into essential oil emulsions of Allium sativum, Copaifera langsdorfii, Cinnamomum zeylanicum and Eugenia caryophyllata at 5% for 3 minutes but stored for 11 days. Berries immersed into distilled water were used as control-treatments. The percentage of disease incidence observed in the control-treatment was similar to the ones observed in the extract of A. indica at 2%. The control-treatment showed disease severity of 75.13% and the percentage of disease control was 20.85%. Fruit immersed into distilled water presented less effectiveness than the ones immersed into citric extracts, which promoted the highest effectiveness. Citric extract at 4% was the most efficient treatment because the disease incidence was 19.44%, the disease severity was 9.34% and the disease control was 90.16%. Less severity and, consequently, more disease control were achieved by immersing the berries into the emulsion of essential oil of A. sativum, followed by treatments with C. langsdorfii, E. caryophyllata and C. zeylanicum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem extract at 2% had disease incidence similar to water control.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
extract of A. indica at 2%e0
Interactor
Colletotrichum musaeColletotrichum musaee1pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
control-treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum musae
Colletotrichum musae · InteractorPlant pests and diseases · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of disease incidence observed in the control-treatment was similar to the ones observed in the extract of A. indica at 2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“In banana, fruit rot is incited by Colletotrichum musae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water control had 75.13% disease severity.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
control-treatmente0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Value
75.13%e0

Verbatim

e0

“The control-treatment showed disease severity of 75.13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water control had 20.85% disease control.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
disease controle0
Value
20.85%e0

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of disease control was 20.85%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric extracts were more effective than distilled water, with the highest effectiveness.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
citric extractse0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
distilled watere0

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit immersed into distilled water presented less effectiveness than the ones immersed into citric extracts, which promoted the highest effectiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric extract at 4% yielded 19.44% disease incidence.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Citric extract at 4%e0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
most efficiente0
Value
19.44%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Citric extract at 4% was the most efficient treatment because the disease incidence was 19.44%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric extract at 4% yielded 9.34% disease severity.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Citric extract at 4%e0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
most efficiente0
Value
9.34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Citric extract at 4% was the most efficient treatment because the disease incidence was 19.44%, the disease severity was 9.34%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citric extract at 4% yielded 90.16% disease control.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Citric extract at 4%e0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
most efficiente0
Value
90.16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Citric extract at 4% was the most efficient treatment because the disease incidence was 19.44%, the disease severity was 9.34% and the disease control was 90.16%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allium sativum oil emulsion gave the lowest severity and greatest control among the oils.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
emulsion of essential oil of A. sativume0
Outcome
severitye0
Direction
Lesse0
Comparator
C. langsdorfii, E. caryophyllata and C. zeylanicume0

Verbatim

e0

“Less severity and, consequently, more disease control were achieved by immersing the berries into the emulsion of essential oil of A. sativum, followed by treatments with C. langsdorfii, E. caryophyllata and C. zeylanicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allium sativum oil emulsion gave more disease control than the other oils.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
emulsion of essential oil of A. sativume0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
C. langsdorfii, E. caryophyllata and C. zeylanicume0

Verbatim

e0

“Less severity and, consequently, more disease control were achieved by immersing the berries into the emulsion of essential oil of A. sativum, followed by treatments with C. langsdorfii, E. caryophyllata and C. zeylanicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–75 · show in text ↑

Allium sativum · disease · MusaResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · Colletotrichum musae · MusaPositive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

botanical · disease · MusaPositive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

botanical · control · MusaResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.