Abstract
Tomato plants were grown in commercial compost with the root system divided equally in two parts (PRD technique). At the end of vegetative and during generative stage of development, half of the root system was exposed to drought, while the remainder of the root system was irrigated. One PRD treatment took c.10 days and during this period the soil water content in the dry root side was reduced to 30%. After this, the treatment was reversed, allowing the previously dry compartment to be well-watered and the well-watered compartment to dry down. In control plants both compartments were watered daily to drip point throughout the experimental period. During experimental period the following measurements were done: plant height, leaf number and area, number of flower trusses, number and diameter of fruit leaf gas exchange (photosynthesis and transpiration), leaf water potential leaf apoplastic pH and water-use efficiency (WUE). Obtained results of plants height and leaf number and area showed that, as a consequence of PRD treatment, the growth of whole plants was reduced, but not fruit, although WUE was increased. These results pointed out that with PRD technique it is possible to reduce irrigation water without significant reduction effect on tomato yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Partial root drying reduced whole-plant growth.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- PRD treatmente0
- Outcome
- growth of whole plantse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“as a consequence of PRD treatment, the growth of whole plants was reduced”
t0“partial root drying on growth and photosynthesis of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Partial root drying did not reduce fruit growth.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- partial root dryingt0
- Outcome
- fruite0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“but not fruit”
t0“partial root drying on growth and photosynthesis of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Partial root drying increased water use efficiency.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- partial root dryingt0
- Outcome
- WUEe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“although WUE was increased”
t0“partial root drying on growth and photosynthesis of tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors concluded PRD can reduce irrigation without significant tomato yield loss.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Outcome
- reduce irrigation water without significant reduction effect on tomato yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“with PRD technique it is possible to reduce irrigation water without significant reduction effect on tomato yield”
The same questions in other papers
processing · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →processing · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →irrigation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
171 papers more in this group
See all 175 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.