Paper · 2005 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effects of Salinity, Imazethapyr, and Chlorimuron Application on Soybean Growth and Yield

Sharon K. Papiernik; Catherine M. Grieve; Scott M. Lesch; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
73
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Soybean is an important crop worldwide. Soybean cultivars differ in their sensitivity to soil salinity and herbicide damage. In these experiments, we examined the impact of salinization and herbicide (imazethapyr and chlorimuron) application on the growth and yield of two soybean cultivars, Essex and Manokin. Experiments were conducted in small pots in the greenhouse, in outdoor sand cultures, and in drip‐irrigated field plots. Plants were irrigated with non‐saline water or saline water (electrical conductivity, EC=7 dS/m) with a composition typical of those in areas affected by sulfate‐dominated salinity. Morphological changes resulted from herbicide application, including leaf elongation and formation of large shoots at the cotyledonary node. Herbicide treatment significantly reduced main stem height, number of nodes on the main stem, and stem diameter relative to the controls (not treated with herbicide); responses from the two herbicides were not significantly different. Salinity had a significant effect on seed weight: yield for “Essex” (a Cl accumulator) was significantly higher when irrigated with fresh water, while yield for “Manokin” (a Cl excluder) was significantly larger for plants irrigated with saline water. Yield for “Essex” was greater than that for “Manokin” when the plants were irrigated with fresh water; but at the higher irrigation water salinity (7 dS/m), “Manokin” produced significantly greater yield than “Essex.” Although herbicide application significantly impacted several growth variables, herbicide treatment had no significant impact on yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides caused leaf elongation and large shoots at the cotyledonary node.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
herbicide applicatione0
Outcome
leaf elongation and formation of large shoots at the cotyledonary nodee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Morphological changes resulted from herbicide application, including leaf elongation and formation of large shoots at the cotyledonary node.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides significantly reduced main stem height, node number, and stem diameter versus untreated controls.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Herbicide treatmente0
Outcome
main stem height, number of nodes on the main stem, and stem diametere0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controls (not treated with herbicide)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide treatment significantly reduced main stem height, number of nodes on the main stem, and stem diameter relative to the controls (not treated with herbicide); responses from the two herbicides were not significantly different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two herbicides did not differ significantly in growth responses.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
two herbicidese0
Outcome
responses from the two herbicidese0
Direction
not significantly differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide treatment significantly reduced main stem height, number of nodes on the main stem, and stem diameter relative to the controls (not treated with herbicide); responses from the two herbicides were not significantly different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Essex yield was significantly higher under fresh water than saline water.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Essexe0
Treatment
fresh watere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
saline watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity had a significant effect on seed weight: yield for “Essex” (a Cl accumulator) was significantly higher when irrigated with fresh water, while yield for “Manokin” (a Cl excluder) was significantly larger for plants irrigated with saline water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manokin yield was significantly higher under saline water than fresh water.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Manokine0
Treatment
saline watere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
fresh watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity had a significant effect on seed weight: yield for “Essex” (a Cl accumulator) was significantly higher when irrigated with fresh water, while yield for “Manokin” (a Cl excluder) was significantly larger for plants irrigated with saline water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With fresh water, Essex yielded more than Manokin.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Essexe0
Treatment
fresh watere0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Manokine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield for “Essex” was greater than that for “Manokin” when the plants were irrigated with fresh water; but at the higher irrigation water salinity (7 dS/m), “Manokin” produced significantly greater yield than “Essex.””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 7 dS/m, Manokin yielded significantly more than Essex.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Manokine0
Treatment
higher irrigation water salinity (7 dS/m)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Essexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield for “Essex” was greater than that for “Manokin” when the plants were irrigated with fresh water; but at the higher irrigation water salinity (7 dS/m), “Manokin” produced significantly greater yield than “Essex.””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application had no significant impact on yield.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
herbicide treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although herbicide application significantly impacted several growth variables, herbicide treatment had no significant impact on yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1604 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–72 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

45 papers: 3 positive, 42 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

herbicide · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

122 papers: 60 positive, 62 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

118 papers more in this group

See all 122 papers →

herbicide · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

460 papers: 322 positive, 138 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 322 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

456 papers more in this group

See all 460 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.