Paper · 2006 · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology

Differential Expression of Rice Genes Under Different Nitrogen Forms and Their Relationship with Sulfur Metabolism

Guo-Hui Zhu; Chu-Xiong Zhuang; Yu-Qi Wang; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Microarray analysis was initially performed to screen for differentially expressed genes between nitrate-and ammonium-fed rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves. In total, 198 genes were shown to have a unique expression response to each treatment and most of the genes for which function is known were involved in signal transduction, plant stress resistance, transcriptional regulation, and basic metabolism. Northern blotting analysis confirmed that expression of the MT and PCS genes was highly upregulated in ammonium-fed leaves compared with expression in nitrate-fed leaves and it was further revealed that ammonium-fed leaves accumulated more cysteine and glutathione. The upregulated expressions of the MT and PCS genes and the higher levels of cysteine and glutathione in ammonium-fed leaves indicate that ammonium may be able to accelerate sulfur assimilation metabolism in rice leaves. Unexpectedly, Northern blotting analysis showed that the expression of the two key enzymes in the sulfur assimilation pathway, namely adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate reductase and O-acetylserine(thiol)lyase, was not upregulated by ammonium treatment. It was found that the total content of free amino acids was much higher in ammonium-fed leaves compared with nitrate-fed leaves, mainly resulting from an increase in several amino acids such as serine, asparagine, glutamine, and arginine. The increased amino acids, in particular serine (as a central substrate for the synthesis of the thiol metabolites), may have promoted sulfur assimilation metabolism under conditions of ammonium nutrition. (Managing editor: Ping He)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

198 genes showed a unique expression response to each nitrate or ammonium treatment in rice leaves.

Outcome
unique expression response to each treatmente2
Value
198 genese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“between nitrate-and ammonium-fed rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–151 · show in text ↑
e2

“198 genes were shown to have a unique expression response to each treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium-fed rice leaves showed highly upregulated MT and PCS gene expression compared with nitrate-fed leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese3
Treatment
ammonium-fede3
Gene
MT and PCSe3
Outcome
expression of the MT and PCS genese3
Direction
highly upregulatede3
Comparator
nitrate-fed leavese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“between nitrate-and ammonium-fed rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–151 · show in text ↑
e3

“expression of the MT and PCS genes was highly upregulated in ammonium-fed leaves compared with expression in nitrate-fed leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium-fed rice leaves accumulated more cysteine and glutathione.

Organ / stage
leavese4
Treatment
ammonium-fede4
Outcome
cysteine and glutathionee4
Direction
accumulated moree4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“between nitrate-and ammonium-fed rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–151 · show in text ↑
e4

“ammonium-fed leaves accumulated more cysteine and glutathione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium treatment did not upregulate expression of adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate reductase or O-acetylserine(thiol)lyase in rice leaves.

Treatment
ammonium treatmente5
Gene
adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate reductase and O-acetylserine(thiol)lyasee5
Outcome
expression of the two key enzymes in the sulfur assimilation pathwaye5
Direction
not upregulatede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“between nitrate-and ammonium-fed rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–151 · show in text ↑
e5

“expression of the two key enzymes in the sulfur assimilation pathway, namely adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate reductase and O-acetylserine(thiol)lyase, was not upregulated by ammonium treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium-fed rice leaves had a much higher total free amino acid content than nitrate-fed leaves.

Treatment
ammonium-fede6
Outcome
total content of free amino acidse6
Direction
much highere6
Comparator
nitrate-fed leavese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“between nitrate-and ammonium-fed rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–151 · show in text ↑
e6

“the total content of free amino acids was much higher in ammonium-fed leaves compared with nitrate-fed leaves, mainly resulting from an increase in several amino acids such as serine, asparagine, glutamine, and arginine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nutrition increased serine, asparagine, glutamine and arginine in rice leaves compared with nitrate nutrition.

Treatment
ammonium-fede6
Outcome
several amino acids such as serine, asparagine, glutamine, and argininee6
Direction
increasee6
Comparator
nitrate-fed leavese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“between nitrate-and ammonium-fed rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–151 · show in text ↑
e6

“the total content of free amino acids was much higher in ammonium-fed leaves compared with nitrate-fed leaves, mainly resulting from an increase in several amino acids such as serine, asparagine, glutamine, and arginine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1373 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium may be able to accelerate sulfur assimilation metabolism in rice leaves, indicated by MT and PCS expression and higher cysteine and glutathione.

Gene
MT and PCSe0
Outcome
sulfur assimilation metabolisme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“between nitrate-and ammonium-fed rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–151 · show in text ↑
e0

“The upregulated expressions of the MT and PCS genes and the higher levels of cysteine and glutathione in ammonium-fed leaves indicate that ammonium may be able to accelerate sulfur assimilation metabolism in rice leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–887 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serine, as a central substrate for thiol synthesis, may have promoted sulfur assimilation metabolism under ammonium nutrition.

Compound
serinee7
Outcome
sulfur assimilation metabolisme7
Qualifier
may have promotede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“between nitrate-and ammonium-fed rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–151 · show in text ↑
e7

“The increased amino acids, in particular serine (as a central substrate for the synthesis of the thiol metabolites), may have promoted sulfur assimilation metabolism under conditions of ammonium nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1579 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · molecular: expression · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 29 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.