Paper · 2008 · International Journal of Food Science & Technology

Influence of processing and storage on the antioxidant activity of apple derivatives

Giampiero Sacchetti; Emiliano Cocci; GianGaetano Pinnavaia; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary The antioxidant activity of seven apple varieties was determined on fresh fruits and processed products (dried fruits and purees) and during storage. The antioxidant activity of apples correlated with the total phenol concentration but not with ascorbic acid concentration. Apple derivatives showed a lower antioxidant activity than the counterparts of the fresh fruits and the occurrence of browning phenomena during processing resulted in lower antioxidant activity. Dried fruits showed higher antioxidant activity per gram of dried matter than fruit purees probably because of the lower total thermal effect of processing. The antioxidant activity of all products increased within the first month of storage, and then declined. The extent of early increase was related to the polyphenol content of the fruit. Packaging conditions further influenced the antioxidant activity increase during storage possibly by affecting the oxygen availability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple antioxidant activity correlated with total phenol concentration.

Compound
total phenol concentratione0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The antioxidant activity of apples correlated with the total phenol concentration but not with ascorbic acid concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–280 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple antioxidant activity did not correlate with ascorbic acid concentration.

Compound
ascorbic acid concentratione0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
note0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The antioxidant activity of apples correlated with the total phenol concentration but not with ascorbic acid concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Processed apple derivatives had lower antioxidant activity than fresh fruit.

Treatment
derivativese0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
fresh fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apple derivatives showed a lower antioxidant activity than the counterparts of the fresh fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–377 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Browning during processing lowered apple antioxidant activity.

Taxon
apple varietiesMalus domesticae1
Treatment
browning phenomena during processinge0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the occurrence of browning phenomena during processing resulted in lower antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–475 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried apple fruit had higher antioxidant activity per gram dry matter than puree.

Taxon
apple varietiesMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Dried fruitse0
Outcome
antioxidant activity per gram of dried mattere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
fruit pureese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dried fruits showed higher antioxidant activity per gram of dried matter than fruit purees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–567 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first month of storage increased antioxidant activity in all apple products.

Taxon
apple varietiesMalus domesticae1
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
first month of storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The antioxidant activity of all products increased within the first month of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–718 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant activity declined after the first month of storage.

Taxon
apple varietiesMalus domesticae1
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
thene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The antioxidant activity of all products increased within the first month of storage, and then declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The early antioxidant activity increase related to fruit polyphenol content.

Taxon
apple varietiesMalus domesticae1
Compound
polyphenol contente0
Outcome
extent of early increasee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extent of early increase was related to the polyphenol content of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–818 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaging conditions influenced the rise in antioxidant activity during storage.

Taxon
apple varietiesMalus domesticae1
Treatment
Packaging conditionse0
Outcome
antioxidant activity increasee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Packaging conditions further influenced the antioxidant activity increase during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–908 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.