Paper · 2005 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Comparison of Sugar Beet Cropping Systems with Dead and Living Mulch using a Glyphosate‐resistant Hybrid

J. Petersen; A. Röver

12
claims
16
verbatim quotes
42
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate new options for sugar beet mulch systems, using a glyphosate‐resistant hybrid. In four field trials – conducted in 2002 and 2003 at two sites in a major sugar beet‐growing region in the central Germany – three different mulch systems (straw, non‐winterhardy and winterhardy cover crop) and an alternative seedbed preparation method (rotary band tillage) have been tested in comparison with a control treatment (plough, no mulch, broadcast seedbed preparation) representing the common German practice. In all systems, a set of eight different weed control programmes, including two reference treatments, one with selective conventional herbicides and five exclusively using glyphosate, has been evaluated for efficacy. It could be shown that the integration of winterhardy cover crops into sugar beet mulch systems reduced the risk of nitrogen loss by leaching. The changes in the nitrogen dynamics neither influence the yield nor the technical quality of the sugar beet. The field emergence of sugar beet decreased while using a winterhardy cover crop, but was not altered by the seedbed preparation method. Compared with the conventional broadcast seedbed preparation, the rotary band tillage did reduce the weed density. The lowest weed density was observed in the straw mulch system. It was not possible to control the remaining plants of the winterhardy cover crops completely with selective herbicides. If glyphosate was used until the four‐leaf stage of the sugar beet, a regulation of the winterhardy cover crop was achievable. With glyphosate it was also feasible to control older weeds together with the newly emerging ones with post‐emergence applications only. For most of the mulch systems tested, the sugar beet was very sensitive to weed competition between the four‐ and 10‐leaf stage. If the weeds within the sugar beet rows were controlled during this sensitive period with an early glyphosate band application, the remaining weeds between the rows could be left uncontrolled until the 10‐leaf stage of the sugar beet without any yield loss. Only in the combination of winterhardy cover crop × rotary band seedbed preparation, the weeds and cover crop had to be controlled directly after emergence of the sugar beet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sugar beet systems, winterhardy cover crops was associated with risk of nitrogen loss by leaching.

Treatment
winterhardy cover cropse0
Outcome
risk of nitrogen loss by leachinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the integration of winterhardy cover crops into sugar beet mulch systems reduced the risk of nitrogen loss by leaching.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sugar beet systems, changes in the nitrogen dynamics was associated with yield and technical quality.

Treatment
changes in the nitrogen dynamicse0
Outcome
yield nor the technical qualitye0
Direction
neither influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The changes in the nitrogen dynamics neither influence the yield nor the technical quality of the sugar beet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sugar beet systems, winterhardy cover crop was associated with field emergence of sugar beet.

Treatment
winterhardy cover crope0
Outcome
field emergence of sugar beete0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field emergence of sugar beet decreased while using a winterhardy cover crop, but was not altered by the seedbed preparation method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sugar beet systems, seedbed preparation method was associated with field emergence of sugar beet.

Treatment
seedbed preparation methode0
Outcome
field emergence of sugar beete0
Direction
not alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field emergence of sugar beet decreased while using a winterhardy cover crop, but was not altered by the seedbed preparation method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sugar beet systems, rotary band tillage was associated with weed density.

Treatment
rotary band tillagee0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional broadcast seedbed preparation, the rotary band tillage did reduce the weed density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sugar beet systems, straw mulch system was associated with weed density.

Treatment
straw mulch systeme0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest weed density was observed in the straw mulch system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sugar beet systems, selective herbicides was associated with remaining plants of the winterhardy cover crops.

Treatment
selective herbicidese0
Outcome
remaining plants of the winterhardy cover cropse0
Direction
not possiblee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was not possible to control the remaining plants of the winterhardy cover crops completely with selective herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sugar beet systems, glyphosate was associated with winterhardy cover crop.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
winterhardy cover crope0
Direction
achievablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“If glyphosate was used until the four‐leaf stage of the sugar beet, a regulation of the winterhardy cover crop was achievable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sugar beet systems, glyphosate was associated with older weeds together with the newly emerging ones.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
older weeds together with the newly emerging onese0
Direction
feasiblee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With glyphosate it was also feasible to control older weeds together with the newly emerging ones with post‐emergence applications only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sugar beet systems, weed competition was associated with sugar beet was very sensitive.

Treatment
weed competitione0
Outcome
sugar beet was very sensitivee0
Direction
very sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For most of the mulch systems tested, the sugar beet was very sensitive to weed competition between the four‐ and 10‐leaf stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sugar beet systems, early glyphosate band application was associated with yield loss.

Treatment
early glyphosate band applicatione0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
without anye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“If the weeds within the sugar beet rows were controlled during this sensitive period with an early glyphosate band application, the remaining weeds between the rows could be left uncontrolled until the 10‐leaf stage of the sugar beet without any yield loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–2105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sugar beet systems, winterhardy cover crop × rotary band seedbed preparation was associated with weeds and cover crop had to be controlled directly after emergence.

Treatment
winterhardy cover crop × rotary band seedbed preparatione0
Outcome
weeds and cover crop had to be controlled directly after emergencee0
Direction
had to be controllede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only in the combination of winterhardy cover crop × rotary band seedbed preparation, the weeds and cover crop had to be controlled directly after emergence of the sugar beet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2106–2280 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

cover crop · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

tillage · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

organic · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.