Paper · 1989 · Agronomy Journal

Reduced Tillage System Influence on Yield of Sunflower Hybrids

Edward J. Deibert

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Information on the effect of reduced tillage on sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) production with different hybrids is limited. A 3‐yr study (1984 to 1986) was undertaken to evaluate the effect of tillage system and weed control method on seed weight, yield, oil concentration, and total oil of early and late maturity sunflower hybrids under dryland conditions in North Dakota. Sunflower hybrids were grown on a Fargo clay soil (fine, montmorillonitic, frigid Vertic Haplaquolls) with established long term tillage plots. Tillage treatments included conventional (Plow) and three reduced tillage systems (Sweep, Intertill, and No‐till) with weed control provided by herbicides with and without cultivation. Yield, weight, oil concentration, and oil yield of the sunflower seed was not significantly different among tillage systems or between weed control methods. Hybrids performed similarly in the seed parameters measured, although the late maturity hybrid consistently produced smaller seed. Results from the study indicated that early maturity sunflower hybrids are better adapted to the dryland areas of the cool northern states because seed yield and quality, irrespective of tillage or weed control method, were equal to or better than those for late maturity hybrids.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield, weight, oil concentration and oil yield did not differ significantly among tillage systems.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
tillage systemse0
Outcome
Yield, weight, oil concentration, and oil yielde0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
tillage systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield, weight, oil concentration, and oil yield of the sunflower seed was not significantly different among tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Those seed traits did not differ significantly between weed control methods.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
weed control methodse0
Outcome
Yield, weight, oil concentration, and oil yielde0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
weed control methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield, weight, oil concentration, and oil yield of the sunflower seed was not significantly different among tillage systems or between weed control methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–872 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrids performed similarly on measured seed parameters.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
seed parameters measurede0
Direction
similarlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hybrids performed similarly in the seed parameters measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The late maturity hybrid consistently produced smaller seeds.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
late maturity hybride0
Outcome
seede0
Direction
smallere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the late maturity hybrid consistently produced smaller seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude early maturity hybrids are better adapted to dryland areas of cool northern states.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
early maturity sunflower hybridse0
Outcome
early maturity sunflower hybrids are better adapted to the dryland areas of the cool northern statese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early maturity sunflower hybrids are better adapted to the dryland areas of the cool northern states because seed yield and quality, irrespective of tillage or weed control method, were equal to or better than those for late maturity hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1284 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

herbicide · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.