Paper · 2008 · Soil Science & Plant Nutrition

Colonization and growth promotion characteristics ofEnterobactersp. andHerbaspirillumsp. onBrassica oleracea

Muhammad Zakria; Asuka Ohsako; Yuichi Saeki; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract We investigated the effects of inoculating a dicot plant, Brassica oleracea, with nitrogen-fixing endophytic bacteria isolated from monocots. The bacteria used were Enterobacter sp. strain 35 isolated from sugarcane and Herbaspirillum sp. strain B501 isolated from wild rice. Under glasshouse conditions, B. oleracea inoculated with strain 35 had a significantly greater fresh weight than uninoculated plants, and the fresh weight of plants inoculated with strain B501 tended to be higher than that of uninoculated plants. We conducted a laboratory-scale experiment to confirm the above results and to investigate the colonization and nitrogen-fixing abilities of these bacteria. Plants inoculated with Enterobacter sp. strain 35-1, a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled strain derived from strain 35, had larger bacterial populations and greater acetylene reduction activity than those inoculated with Herbaspirillum sp. strain B501gfp1. Strain 35-1 colonized the intercellular spaces and the junctions of the lateral roots with the parent root. The results indicated that isolates from monocots can successfully colonize B. oleracea (a dicot) and promote plant growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under glasshouse conditions, strain 35 inoculation significantly increased B. oleracea fresh weight versus uninoculated plants.

Taxon
B. oleraceaBrassica oleraceae0
Treatment
inoculated with strain 35e0
Interactor
Enterobacter sp. strain 35Enterobacter sp.e1symbiont
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0
Setting
glasshouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter sp.
Enterobacter sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under glasshouse conditions, B. oleracea inoculated with strain 35 had a significantly greater fresh weight than uninoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–417 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enterobacter sp. strain 35 isolated from sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain B501 inoculation tended to increase plant fresh weight over uninoculated plants.

Taxon
B. oleraceaBrassica oleraceae1
Treatment
inoculated with strain B501e0
Interactor
Herbaspirillum sp. strain B501Herbaspirillum sp.e2symbiont
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
tended to bee0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight of plants inoculated with strain B501 tended to be higher than that of uninoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–530 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. oleracea inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–336 · show in text ↑
e2

“Herbaspirillum sp. strain B501 isolated from wild rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 35-1 inoculation yielded larger bacterial populations than strain B501gfp1 inoculation.

Taxon
B. oleraceaBrassica oleraceae1
Treatment
inoculated with Enterobacter sp. strain 35-1e0
Interactor
Enterobacter sp. strain 35-1Enterobacter sp.e0symbiont
Second interactor
Herbaspirillum sp. strain B501gfp1Herbaspirillum sp.e0symbiont
Outcome
bacterial populationse0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
inoculated with Herbaspirillum sp. strain B501gfp1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter sp.
Enterobacter sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants inoculated with Enterobacter sp. strain 35-1, a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled strain derived from strain 35, had larger bacterial populations and greater acetylene reduction activity than those inoculated with Herbaspirillum sp. strain B501gfp1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–950 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. oleracea inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 35-1 inoculation yielded greater acetylene reduction activity than strain B501gfp1 inoculation.

Taxon
B. oleraceaBrassica oleraceae1
Treatment
inoculated with Enterobacter sp. strain 35-1e0
Interactor
Enterobacter sp. strain 35-1Enterobacter sp.e0symbiont
Second interactor
Herbaspirillum sp. strain B501gfp1Herbaspirillum sp.e0symbiont
Outcome
acetylene reduction activitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
inoculated with Herbaspirillum sp. strain B501gfp1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter sp.
Enterobacter sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants inoculated with Enterobacter sp. strain 35-1, a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled strain derived from strain 35, had larger bacterial populations and greater acetylene reduction activity than those inoculated with Herbaspirillum sp. strain B501gfp1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–950 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. oleracea inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 35-1 colonized intercellular spaces and lateral root junctions.

Taxon
B. oleraceaBrassica oleraceae1
Organ / stage
lateral rootse0
Interactor
Strain 35-1e0symbiont
Outcome
colonized the intercellular spaces and the junctions of the lateral roots with the parent roote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strain 35-1 colonized the intercellular spaces and the junctions of the lateral roots with the parent root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1058 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. oleracea inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–336 · show in text ↑

inoculation · soil: biology · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.