Paper · 1997 · Journal of Phytopathology

Interaction Of Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus and Fusarium culmorum (W. G. Sm.) Sacc. in Winter Wheat

N. Koch; W. Huth

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) epidemics, which occurred predominantly in northern Germany in 1988–90 and caused unusual yield losses of wheat, prompted our study on interactions of BYDV and Fusarium culmorum. At the late stages of plant development (EC 55/65) infections with BYDV resulted in a lower yield reduction of wheat plants than infections with F. culmorum. Combined infections at flowering resulted in severer yield reduction, indicating additive effects of the two pathogens. However, if wheat infected by BYDV at stage EC 25/35 was secondarily inoculated with the fungus at EC 55/65 the yield was less reduced than in combined infections at EC 55/65. Our results proved that the susceptibility of wheat plants to F. culmorum is increased when infection by BYDV takes place during the late stages of growth. These results correspond to observations during 3 years of the epidemic in Germany. In these years BYDV was spread mainly during the late spring, resulting in a severe secondary infection by the fungus. From the results of these investigations it may be concluded that during the years of BYDV epidemic the yield of wheat was reduced to an economically important extent because of the fungal infection, which was favoured by the virus infection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BYDV infection at late growth stages caused a lower yield reduction in wheat than F. culmorum infection.

Organ / stage
late stages of plant development (EC 55/65)e1
Treatment
infections with BYDVe1
Interactor
BYDVBarley yellow dwarf viruse1pathogen
Second interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume1pathogen
Outcome
yield reductione1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
infections with F. culmorume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Barley yellow dwarf virus
Barley yellow dwarf virus · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · Second interactorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“At the late stages of plant development (EC 55/65) infections with BYDV resulted in a lower yield reduction of wheat plants than infections with F. culmorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined infections at flowering caused a severer yield reduction in wheat, indicating additive effects of the two pathogens.

Treatment
Combined infections at floweringe2
Outcome
yield reductione2
Direction
severere2
Qualifier
indicating additive effects of the two pathogense2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Combined infections at flowering resulted in severer yield reduction, indicating additive effects of the two pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat infected by BYDV at EC 25/35 and then inoculated with the fungus at EC 55/65 had less yield reduction than combined infections at EC 55/65.

Organ / stage
EC 25/35e3
Treatment
secondarily inoculated with the funguse3
Interactor
BYDVBarley yellow dwarf viruse3pathogen
Second interactor
the funguse3pathogen
Outcome
the yielde3
Direction
less reducede3
Comparator
combined infections at EC 55/65e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Barley yellow dwarf virus
Barley yellow dwarf virus · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“if wheat infected by BYDV at stage EC 25/35 was secondarily inoculated with the fungus at EC 55/65 the yield was less reduced than in combined infections at EC 55/65”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–96 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BYDV infection during late growth increased the susceptibility of wheat to F. culmorum.

Organ / stage
late stages of growthe4
Treatment
infection by BYDVe4
Interactor
F. culmorumFusarium culmorume4pathogen
Second interactor
BYDVBarley yellow dwarf viruse4pathogen
Outcome
susceptibility of wheat plants to F. culmorume4
Direction
increasede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Barley yellow dwarf virus
Barley yellow dwarf virus · Second interactorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the susceptibility of wheat plants to F. culmorum is increased when infection by BYDV takes place during the late stages of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–96 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield of wheat was reduced to an economically important extent because of fungal infection favoured by virus infection.

Outcome
the yield of wheat was reducede5
Qualifier
because of the fungal infection, which was favoured by the virus infectione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the yield of wheat was reduced to an economically important extent because of the fungal infection, which was favoured by the virus infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BYDV epidemics in northern Germany in 1988–90 caused unusual yield losses in wheat.

Outcome
yield lossese6
Qualifier
unusuale6
Setting
northern Germany in 1988–90e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) epidemics, which occurred predominantly in northern Germany in 1988–90 and caused unusual yield losses of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–157 · show in text ↑

Hordeum vulgare · Barley yellow dwarf virus · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 3 positive, 15 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · Barley yellow dwarf virus · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

infection · Barley yellow dwarf virus · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 2 positive, 11 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

infection · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 32 positive, 51 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.