Abstract
Abstract All codling moth larvae, Laspeyresia pomonella (L.), in 100,000 infested apples were killed by fumigation with 32 g/m 3 methyl bromide for 2 h at about 17 °C followed by 31–35 days of storage at −0.5 °C. The apples were harvested into bins, fumigated, and placed in a standard cold storage room of a grower’s packinghouse as would be done under commercial conditions. Standard cold storage killed all first and second, and some third, instar larvae in nonfumigated fruit. Cursory sampling indicated that fumigation alone, without subsequent cold storage, could kill all stages. The fumigation and storage treatment did not injure Red Delicious, Golden Delicious, Spartan, Jonathan, or Newtown apples.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Fumigation with methyl bromide followed by storage at -0.5 °C killed all codling moth larvae in 100,000 infested apples.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae1 - Treatment
- fumigation with 32 g/m 3 methyl bromide for 2 he1
- Interactor
- Laspeyresia pomonella (L.)e1pest
- Outcome
- codling moth larvaee1
- Direction
- killede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“All codling moth larvae, Laspeyresia pomonella (L.), in 100,000 infested apples were killed by fumigation with 32 g/m 3 methyl bromide for 2 h at about 17 °C followed by 31–35 days of storage at −0.5 °C”
Claim · model-written summary
Standard cold storage killed all first and second, and some third, instar codling moth larvae in nonfumigated apples.
- Taxon
- APPLESt0
- Treatment
- Standard cold storagee2
- Interactor
- CODLING MOTH
Cydia pomonellat0pest - Outcome
- larvaee2
- Direction
- killede2
- Qualifier
- first and second, and some third, instar larvaee2
- Comparator
- nonfumigated fruite2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CODLING MOTH LARVAE IN HARVESTED APPLES”
e2“Standard cold storage killed all first and second, and some third, instar larvae in nonfumigated fruit”
Claim · model-written summary
Fumigation alone, without subsequent cold storage, could kill all codling moth life stages in apples, according to cursory sampling.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- fumigation alonee3
- Interactor
- CODLING MOTHCydia pomonellat0pest
- Outcome
- kill all stagese3
- Qualifier
- Cursory samplinge3
- Comparator
- subsequent cold storagee3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“CODLING MOTH LARVAE IN HARVESTED APPLES”
e1“All codling moth larvae, Laspeyresia pomonella (L.), in 100,000 infested apples were killed by fumigation with 32 g/m 3 methyl bromide for 2 h at about 17 °C followed by 31–35 days of storage at −0.5 °C”
e3“Cursory sampling indicated that fumigation alone, without subsequent cold storage, could kill all stages”
Claim · model-written summary
The fumigation and storage treatment did not injure Red Delicious, Golden Delicious, Spartan, Jonathan or Newtown apples.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticae4
- Material
- Red Delicious, Golden Delicious, Spartan, Jonathan, or Newtowne4
- Treatment
- fumigation and storage treatmente4
- Outcome
- injuree4
- Direction
- did not injuree4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The fumigation and storage treatment did not injure Red Delicious, Golden Delicious, Spartan, Jonathan, or Newtown apples”
The same questions in other papers
bromomethane · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
solarization · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →solarization · Cydia pomonella · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →cold · Cydia pomonella · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.