Paper · 1992 · Pesticide Science

Some physicochemical factors influencing foliar uptake enhancement of glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) by polyoxyethylene surfactants

Robyn E. Gaskin; Peter J. Holloway

15
claims
26
verbatim quotes
86
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Structure‐concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and field bean ( Vicia faba L.) plants growing under controlled‐environment conditions. Candidate surfactants had mean molar ethylene oxide (EO) contents ranging from 5 to 20 and were added at concentrations varying from 0·2 to 10 g litre −‐1 to [ 14 C]glyphosate formulations in acetone–water. Rates and total amounts of herbicide uptake from c . 0·2–μl droplet applications of formulations to leaves were influenced by surfactant EO content, surfactant hydrophobe composition, surfactant concentration, glyphosate concentration and plant species, in a complex manner. Surfactant effects were most pronounced at 0·5 g acid equivalent (a.e.) glyphosate litre −‐1 where, for both target species, surfactants of high EO content (15–20) were most effective at enhancing herbicide uptake: surfactants of lower EO content (5–10) frequently reduced, or failed to improve, glyphosate absorption. Whereas, at optimal EO content, AM surfactants caused greatest uptake enhancement on wheat, A surfactants gave the best overall performance on field bean; NP surfactants were generally the least efficient class of adjuvants on both species. Threshold concentrations of surfactants needed to increase glyphosate uptake were much higher in field bean than wheat ( c. 2 g litre −‐1 and < 1 g litre −‐1 , respectively); less herbicide was taken up by both species at high AM surfactant concentrations. At 5 and 10 g a.e. glyphosate litre −‐1 , there were substantial increases in herbicide absorption and surfactant addition could cause effects on uptake that were different from those observed at lower herbicide doses. In particular, the influence of EO content on glyphosate uptake was now much less marked in both species, especially with AM surfactants. The fundamental importance of glyphosate concentration for its uptake was further emphasised by experiments using formulations with constant a.i./surfactant weight ratios. Any increased foliar penetration resulting from inclusion of surfactants in 0·5 g litre −‐1 [ 14 C]glyphosate formulations gave concomitant increases in the amounts of radiolabel that were translocated away from the site of application. At these low herbicide doses, translocation of absorbed [ 14 C]glyphosate in wheat was c. twice that in field bean; surfactant addition to the formulation did not increase the proportion transported in wheat but substantially enhanced it in field bean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar herbicide uptake depended on surfactant and formulation properties and plant species.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
surfactant EO contente0
Outcome
Rates and total amounts of herbicide uptakee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rates and total amounts of herbicide uptake from c . 0·2–μl droplet applications of formulations to leaves were influenced by surfactant EO content, surfactant hydrophobe composition, surfactant concentration, glyphosate concentration and plant species, in a complex manner.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–882 · show in text ↑
e1

“Abstract Structure‐concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and field bean ( Vicia faba L.) plants growing under controlled‐environment conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High EO surfactants enhanced uptake at low glyphosate concentration in both species.

Treatment
surfactants of high EO content (15–20)e0
Outcome
herbicide uptakee0
Direction
enhancinge0
Qualifier
both target speciese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for both target species, surfactants of high EO content (15–20) were most effective at enhancing herbicide uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1096 · show in text ↑
e1

“Abstract Structure‐concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and field bean ( Vicia faba L.) plants growing under controlled‐environment conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High EO surfactants enhanced uptake at low glyphosate concentration in field bean.

Taxon
field beane1
Treatment
surfactants of high EO content (15–20)e0
Outcome
herbicide uptakee0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“for both target species, surfactants of high EO content (15–20) were most effective at enhancing herbicide uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1096 · show in text ↑
e1

“Abstract Structure‐concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and field bean ( Vicia faba L.) plants growing under controlled‐environment conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low EO surfactants frequently reduced or failed to improve glyphosate absorption.

Treatment
surfactants of lower EO content (5–10)e0
Outcome
glyphosate absorptione0
Direction
reduced, or failed to improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“surfactants of lower EO content (5–10) frequently reduced, or failed to improve, glyphosate absorption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1200 · show in text ↑
e1

“Abstract Structure‐concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and field bean ( Vicia faba L.) plants growing under controlled‐environment conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM surfactants produced the greatest uptake enhancement in wheat at optimal EO content.

Treatment
AM surfactantse0
Outcome
uptake enhancemente0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at optimal EO content, AM surfactants caused greatest uptake enhancement on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1292 · show in text ↑
e1

“Abstract Structure‐concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and field bean ( Vicia faba L.) plants growing under controlled‐environment conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A surfactants performed best for field bean uptake at optimal EO content.

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
A surfactantse0
Outcome
best overall performancee0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A surfactants gave the best overall performance on field bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1355 · show in text ↑
e1

“Abstract Structure‐concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and field bean ( Vicia faba L.) plants growing under controlled‐environment conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP surfactants were generally least efficient in both species.

Treatment
NP surfactantse0
Outcome
least efficient class of adjuvantse0
Direction
least efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NP surfactants were generally the least efficient class of adjuvants on both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“Abstract Structure‐concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and field bean ( Vicia faba L.) plants growing under controlled‐environment conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–400 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field bean required a higher surfactant threshold than wheat to increase glyphosate uptake.

Taxon
field beane0
Outcome
Threshold concentrations of surfactants needed to increase glyphosate uptakee0
Direction
much highere0
Value
c. 2 g litre −‐1e0
Comparator
wheate0

Verbatim

e0

“Threshold concentrations of surfactants needed to increase glyphosate uptake were much higher in field bean than wheat ( c. 2 g litre −‐1 and < 1 g litre −‐1 , respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High AM surfactant concentrations reduced herbicide uptake in both species.

Treatment
high AM surfactant concentrationse0
Outcome
herbicide was taken upe0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less herbicide was taken up by both species at high AM surfactant concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1698 · show in text ↑
e1

“Abstract Structure‐concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and field bean ( Vicia faba L.) plants growing under controlled‐environment conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher glyphosate doses substantially increased absorption.

Treatment
5 and 10 g a.e. glyphosate litre −‐1e0
Outcome
herbicide absorptione0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 5 and 10 g a.e. glyphosate litre −‐1 , there were substantial increases in herbicide absorption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1798 · show in text ↑
e1

“Abstract Structure‐concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and field bean ( Vicia faba L.) plants growing under controlled‐environment conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–400 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher herbicide doses, EO content had much less influence on uptake in both species.

Treatment
EO contente0
Outcome
glyphosate uptakee0
Direction
much less markede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the influence of EO content on glyphosate uptake was now much less marked in both species, especially with AM surfactants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–2055 · show in text ↑
e1

“Abstract Structure‐concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and field bean ( Vicia faba L.) plants growing under controlled‐environment conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–400 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surfactants that increased foliar penetration increased translocated radiolabel.

Treatment
inclusion of surfactantse0
Outcome
amounts of radiolabel that were translocated away from the site of applicatione0
Direction
increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Any increased foliar penetration resulting from inclusion of surfactants in 0·5 g litre −‐1 [ 14 C]glyphosate formulations gave concomitant increases in the amounts of radiolabel that were translocated away from the site of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2229–2465 · show in text ↑
e1

“Abstract Structure‐concentration–foliar uptake enhancement relationships between commercial polyoxyethylene primary aliphatic alcohol (A), nonylphenol (NP), primary aliphatic amine (AM) surfactants and the herbicide glyphosatemono(isopropylammonium) were studied in experiments with wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and field bean ( Vicia faba L.) plants growing under controlled‐environment conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–400 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Translocation of absorbed glyphosate in wheat was about twice that in field bean.

Outcome
translocation of absorbed [ 14 C]glyphosatee0
Direction
twicee0
Value
c. twicee0
Comparator
field beane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“translocation of absorbed [ 14 C]glyphosate in wheat was c. twice that in field bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2496–2580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surfactant addition did not increase the transported proportion in wheat.

Treatment
surfactant additione0
Outcome
proportion transportede0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“surfactant addition to the formulation did not increase the proportion transported in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2582–2673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surfactant addition substantially enhanced the transported proportion in field bean.

Taxon
field beane0
Treatment
surfactant additione0
Outcome
proportion transportede0
Direction
substantially enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“surfactant addition to the formulation did not increase the proportion transported in wheat but substantially enhanced it in field bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2582–2717 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

surfactant · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

oxirane · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

amine · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

surfactant · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.