Paper · 1958 · Agronomy Journal

The Influence of Oat Stubble Management on the Establishment of Alfalfa and Red Clover1

L. J. Klebesadel; Dale Smith

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Synopsis Establishment was improved by clipping stubble close to the soil surface in late July after grain harvest, especially where the oats had been sprayed to control weeds. Clipping benefited red clover more than alfalfa. Clipping in late August was usually beneficial when moisture was abundant but was harmful under low‐moisture conditions. Raking after clipping was beneficial to alfalfa but was usually detrimental to red clover except after August clipping when moisture was abundant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late July close clipping after grain harvest improved establishment, especially with sprayed oats.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
clipping stubble close to the soil surface in late Julye0
Outcome
Establishmente0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
especially where the oats had been sprayed to control weedse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Establishment was improved by clipping stubble close to the soil surface in late July after grain harvest, especially where the oats had been sprayed to control weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping benefited red clover more than alfalfa.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Treatment
Clippinge0
Outcome
benefitede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
alfalfae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clipping benefited red clover more than alfalfa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late August clipping was usually beneficial under abundant moisture.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Clipping in late Auguste0
Outcome
beneficiale0
Direction
beneficiale0
Qualifier
moisture was abundante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clipping in late August was usually beneficial when moisture was abundant but was harmful under low‐moisture conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late August clipping was harmful under low moisture.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Clipping in late Auguste0
Outcome
harmfule0
Direction
harmfule0
Qualifier
low‐moisture conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clipping in late August was usually beneficial when moisture was abundant but was harmful under low‐moisture conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–346 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raking after clipping benefited alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Raking after clippinge0
Outcome
beneficiale0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Raking after clipping was beneficial to alfalfa but was usually detrimental to red clover except after August clipping when moisture was abundant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raking after clipping was usually detrimental to red clover, except after August clipping with abundant moisture.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Treatment
Raking after clippinge0
Outcome
detrimentale0
Direction
detrimentale0
Qualifier
except after August clipping when moisture was abundante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Raking after clipping was beneficial to alfalfa but was usually detrimental to red clover except after August clipping when moisture was abundant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–493 · show in text ↑

mechanical · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.