Paper · 2013 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Effect of Different Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Maize Seed Germination and Seedling Development

Pacôme A. Noumavo; Eméric Kochoni; Yédéou O. Didagbé; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
96
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Our study aimed at assessing the effects of 3 Plants Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) either singly or in combination on maize growth under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. Seeds were inoculated with single and combined solution of 108 CFU/ml of Rhizobacteria. Seeds were not inoculated for the control variant. The highest germination percentage was obtained with the combination of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas putida. This combination also recorded the best vigor index, plants circumferences number of leaves and the leaf area. The maximal heights of plants were observed with seeds treated with Azospirillum lipoferum with an increase of 37.32%. The highest rates of underground dry matter were recorded with A. lipoferum, with an increase of more than 56% comparative to control, while the combination P. fluorescens and P. putida increased the aerial dry matter of 59.11%. Finally, the highest value of the aerial biomass was obtained with the plants treated with the combination of P. fluorescens and P. putida and the highest underground biomass was obtained with plants treated only with A. lipoferum. These results suggest that specific combinations of PGPR can be considered as efficient alternative biofertilizers to promote maize seed germination, biomass and crop yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens plus Pseudomonas putida gave the highest maize germination percentage.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combination of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas putidae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · Second interactorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest germination percentage was obtained with the combination of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas putida.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–441 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination gave the best vigor index, plant circumference, leaf number and leaf area.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combination of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas putidae1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense1symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
vigor index, plants circumferences number of leaves and the leaf areae0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · Second interactorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This combination also recorded the best vigor index, plants circumferences number of leaves and the leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–552 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest germination percentage was obtained with the combination of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas putida.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–441 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum lipoferum increased plant height by 37.32%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
seeds treated with Azospirillum lipoferume0
Interactor
Azospirillum lipoferumAzospirillum lipoferume0symbiont
Outcome
heights of plantse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
37.32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximal heights of plants were observed with seeds treated with Azospirillum lipoferum with an increase of 37.32%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. lipoferum increased underground dry matter by more than 56% versus control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
A. lipoferume0
Interactor
A. lipoferumAzospirillum lipoferume0symbiont
Outcome
underground dry mattere0
Direction
increasee0
Value
more than 56%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest rates of underground dry matter were recorded with A. lipoferum, with an increase of more than 56% comparative to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The P. fluorescens and P. putida combination increased aerial dry matter by 59.11%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combination P. fluorescens and P. putidae0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Second interactor
P. putidaPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
aerial dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
59.11%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · Second interactorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination P. fluorescens and P. putida increased the aerial dry matter of 59.11%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination produced the highest aerial biomass.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combination of P. fluorescens and P. putidae0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Second interactor
P. putidaPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
aerial biomasse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · Second interactorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest value of the aerial biomass was obtained with the plants treated with the combination of P. fluorescens and P. putida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. lipoferum alone produced the highest underground biomass.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plants treated only with A. lipoferume0
Interactor
A. lipoferumAzospirillum lipoferume0symbiont
Outcome
underground biomasse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest underground biomass was obtained with plants treated only with A. lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Specific PGPR combinations are proposed as biofertilizers for maize germination, biomass and yield.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
alternative biofertilizers to promote maize seed germination, biomass and crop yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“specific combinations of PGPR can be considered as efficient alternative biofertilizers to promote maize seed germination, biomass and crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum lipoferum · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Pseudomonas putida · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.