Paper · 1999 · Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins

PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF TOXINS FROM WHEAT ISOLATES OF Drechslera tritici-repentis, Bipolaris bicolor, AND Bipolaris sorokiniana

E. E. BACH; H. KIMATI

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Low molecular weight metabolites produced by Bipolaris bicolor, Bipolaris sorokiniana, and Drechslera tritici-repentis are considered to be toxins that facilitate disease in wheat cultivars. Several such toxins were isolated from these fungi. Electrophoresis demonstrated bands of proteins that reduced shoot inhibition in susceptible plants but not in resistant plants. Chlorophyll content was reduced during the first 10 hours of light in the susceptible plants and after 18 hours in the resistant plants. The enzyme beta-1,3-glucanase increased in the resistant plants after treatment with toxins, but in the susceptible plants this enzyme decreased compared to the control. This suggests that the toxin was a protein and the susceptible plants needed other mechanisms for induced resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein bands reduced shoot inhibition in susceptible wheat plants but not resistant plants.

Material
susceptible plantse0
Treatment
bands of proteinse0
Outcome
shoot inhibitione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
resistant plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Electrophoresis demonstrated bands of proteins that reduced shoot inhibition in susceptible plants but not in resistant plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–370 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content fell during the first 10 hours of light in susceptible wheat plants.

Material
susceptible plantse0
Outcome
Chlorophyll contente0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
during the first 10 hours of lighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll content was reduced during the first 10 hours of light in the susceptible plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content fell after 18 hours of light in resistant wheat plants.

Material
resistant plantse0
Outcome
Chlorophyll contente0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
after 18 hourse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll content was reduced during the first 10 hours of light in the susceptible plants and after 18 hours in the resistant plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxin treatment increased beta-1,3-glucanase in resistant wheat plants.

Material
resistant plantse0
Treatment
toxinse0
Gene
beta-1,3-glucanasee0
Outcome
beta-1,3-glucanasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The enzyme beta-1,3-glucanase increased in the resistant plants after treatment with toxins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxin treatment decreased beta-1,3-glucanase in susceptible wheat plants relative to the control.

Material
susceptible plantse0
Treatment
toxinse1
Gene
beta-1,3-glucanasee1
Outcome
this enzymee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the susceptible plants this enzyme decreased compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–677 · show in text ↑
e1

“The enzyme beta-1,3-glucanase increased in the resistant plants after treatment with toxins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑

pathogen product · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pathogen product · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.