Paper · 2002 · Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology

Control of rhizopus rot of peaches with postharvest treatments of tebuconazole, fludioxonil, andPseudomonas syringae

John Northover; Ting Zhou

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
61
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rhizopus rot caused by Rhizopus stolonifer is a potentially serious postharvest disease of Canadian-grown peaches. Several new fungicides are effective against brown rot (Monilinia fructicola) of peaches, but little is known of their postharvest efficacies against R. stolonifer. Harvested peaches were arranged in trays, individually punctured once and co-treated with a suspension of both R. stolonifer sporangiospores and cells of an isolate of Pseudomonas syringae or one of 13 fungicides at 0.5–1.0 times the dilute concentration used to control brown rot in orchard programs. In subsequent experiments, the peaches were inoculated with R. stolonifer, incubated for 6 h, chilled, and a day later the inoculated sites were brushed with a suspension of fludioxonil, tebuconazole, or P. syringae. In the co-treatment studies, azoxystrobin, fenhexamid, fenbuconazole, myclobutanil, benomyl, and sulfur reduced rhizopus rot by 0–22%. Cyprodinil and propiconazole gave 20–60% reduction, while fludioxonil, tebuconazole, and two P. syringae isolates gave 75–100% reduction, comparable with that of dicloran and iprodione. Post-inoculation brushing treatments with P. syringae at 10 000 µg ESC 10/mL gave less than 20% control, while fludioxonil and tebuconazole gave 90% control (EC90) at 472 and 718 µg/mL, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-inoculation brushing with P. syringae gave less than 20% control of Rhizopus rot of peaches

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
Post-inoculation brushing treatments with P. syringaee4
Interactor
Rhizopus stoloniferRhizopus stolonifere1pathogen
Second interactor
P. syringaePseudomonas syringaee4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
controle4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
less than 20%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizopus stolonifer
Rhizopus stolonifer · InteractorW.A. Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae
Pseudomonas syringae · Second interactorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rhizopus rot caused by Rhizopus stolonifer is a potentially serious postharvest disease of Canadian-grown peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e4

“Post-inoculation brushing treatments with P. syringae at 10 000 µg ESC 10/mL gave less than 20% control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fludioxonil and tebuconazole gave 90% control of Rhizopus rot of peaches at EC90 of 472 and 718 µg/mL

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
fludioxonil and tebuconazolee5
Interactor
Rhizopus stoloniferRhizopus stolonifere1pathogen
Outcome
controle5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
90%e5
Qualifier
EC90) at 472 and 718 µg/mLe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizopus stolonifer
Rhizopus stolonifer · InteractorW.A. Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Rhizopus rot caused by Rhizopus stolonifer is a potentially serious postharvest disease of Canadian-grown peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e5

“while fludioxonil and tebuconazole gave 90% control (EC90) at 472 and 718 µg/mL, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1318 · show in text ↑

tebuconazole · Rhizopus stolonifer · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.