Paper · 1959 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Evapotranspiration and Yield of Corn as Influenced by Moisture Level, Nitrogen Fertilization, and Plant Density

C. W. Carlson; J. Alessi; R. H. Mickelson

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Yields and evapotranspiration rates by corn grown in Gardena loam at two levels of soil moisture, two plant densities, and several rates of N fertilization were studied for two growing seasons. Neither N fertilizer nor plant density influenced yields in the nonirrigated treatment, but in the irrigated treatment corn yields in both plant densities increased when N fertilizer was applied. Measurements made on the number of kernels per square foot, and individual kernel weights showed that grain yields were most influenced by the number of kernels produced per unit area. Neither N fertilizer nor plant density appreciably affected the evapotranspiration rate. Evapotranspiration was considerably greater for the irrigation plots than for the nonirrigation plots. Rates of evapotranspiration were higher in 1957 than in 1956. The pounds of dry matter produced per inch of water used in evapotranspiration (water‐use efficiency) was appreciably increased by using a high plant density and N fertilizer. This effect was much less marked in the nonirrigated treatments than in the irrigated. The amount of dry matter produced per inch of water used was greater on the nonirrigated treatment than on the irrigated treatment, except at the high N rate in the high plant density. It is apparent that if maximum efficiency of moisture use is to be realized, adequate fertilizer and plant densities are required.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer did not influence corn yields in the nonirrigated treatment.

Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier
nonirrigated treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither N fertilizer nor plant density influenced yields in the nonirrigated treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–289 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density did not influence corn yields in the nonirrigated treatment.

Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier
nonirrigated treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither N fertilizer nor plant density influenced yields in the nonirrigated treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–289 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the irrigated treatment, corn yields increased in both plant densities when N fertilizer was applied.

Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
irrigated treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the irrigated treatment corn yields in both plant densities increased when N fertilizer was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yields were most influenced by the number of kernels produced per unit area.

Outcome
grain yieldse0
Qualifier
most influenced by the number of kernels produced per unit areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yields were most influenced by the number of kernels produced per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–582 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer did not appreciably affect the corn evapotranspiration rate.

Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
evapotranspiration ratee0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither N fertilizer nor plant density appreciably affected the evapotranspiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density did not appreciably affect the corn evapotranspiration rate.

Treatment
plant densitye0
Outcome
evapotranspiration ratee0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither N fertilizer nor plant density appreciably affected the evapotranspiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Evapotranspiration was considerably greater for irrigation plots than for nonirrigation plots.

Treatment
irrigation plotse0
Outcome
Evapotranspiratione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
nonirrigation plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evapotranspiration was considerably greater for the irrigation plots than for the nonirrigation plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rates of evapotranspiration were higher in 1957 than in 1956.

Outcome
Rates of evapotranspiratione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
1957e0
Comparator
1956e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rates of evapotranspiration were higher in 1957 than in 1956”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-use efficiency (dry matter per inch of water used in evapotranspiration) was appreciably increased by using a high plant density.

Treatment
a high plant densitye1
Outcome
pounds of dry matter produced per inch of water used in evapotranspiratione0
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pounds of dry matter produced per inch of water used in evapotranspiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“was appreciably increased by using a high plant density and N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-use efficiency (dry matter per inch of water used in evapotranspiration) was appreciably increased by N fertilizer.

Treatment
N fertilizere1
Outcome
pounds of dry matter produced per inch of water used in evapotranspiratione0
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pounds of dry matter produced per inch of water used in evapotranspiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“was appreciably increased by using a high plant density and N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increase in water-use efficiency was much less marked in the nonirrigated treatments than in the irrigated treatments.

Outcome
effecte0
Direction
less markede0
Qualifier
nonirrigated treatmentse0
Comparator
irrigatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This effect was much less marked in the nonirrigated treatments than in the irrigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter produced per inch of water used was greater on the nonirrigated than on the irrigated treatment, except at the high N rate in the high plant density.

Treatment
nonirrigated treatmente0
Outcome
amount of dry matter produced per inch of water usede0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
except at the high N rate in the high plant densitye0
Comparator
irrigated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of dry matter produced per inch of water used was greater on the nonirrigated treatment than on the irrigated treatment, except at the high N rate in the high plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate fertilizer and plant densities are required if maximum efficiency of moisture use is to be realized.

Outcome
maximum efficiency of moisture usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“if maximum efficiency of moisture use is to be realized, adequate fertilizer and plant densities are required”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑

density · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 83 positive, 10 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

138 papers in the same direction as this paper · 519 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.