Paper · 1986 · Crop Science

Selection‐Induced Differences among Strains of Iowa Stiff Stalks Synthetic Maize1

Manuel Oyervides‐Garcia; A. R. Hallauer

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Different recurrent selection methods have been used for the improvement of traits in maize ( Zea mays L.). The relative performance of nine strains of Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSSCO) derived different methods of recurrent selection for different traits were determined by evaluating strains per se, diallel crosses among strains, and S l generations of strains and strain crosses. Objectives were to determine selection. induced differences among the nine strains and the direct and indirect effects of selection for yield, grain moisture, root and stalk lodging, and dropped ears. Replicated field trials were conducted in six environments. BS13(S)C2 had the highest yield per se (7.83 Mg ha ‐1 ) and the highest yielding $1 generation (5.82 Mg ha ‐1 ). Inbreeding depression for yield was less for the highly selected strains and for crosses involving those strains. Selection for resistance to European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner) did not significantly affect yield, but selection for resistance to corn rootworm ( Diabrotica virgifera Le Conte) did have a significant negative correlated effect on grain yield. Changes in frequency of additive effects due to selection for yield improvement were more important for BSI3(S)C2 (seven cycles half‐sib and two cycles S 2 selection) than for BSSS(R)C8 (eight cycles reciprocal recurrent selection). Greater changes were observed in frequency of alleles with dominance effects in BSSS(R)C8 than in BS13(S)C2. After removal the effects of drift, rate of realized gain per cycle was 0.279 Mg ha ‐1 (4.4%) for BS13(S)C2 and 0.259 Mg ha ‐1 (4.1%) for BSSS(R)C8. Yield of the 36 strain crosses ranged from 6.10 Mg ha ‐1 for BSSSCO ✕ BSSS(RW)C2 to 9.37 Mg ha ‐1 for BSSS(R)C8 ✕ BS13(S)C2. Average midparent heterosis for yield was 11.7%. Yield differences among strains and level of heterosis expressed in crosses suggested selection‐induced genetic diversity among strains of BSSSCO.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain BS13(S)C2 had the highest yield per se, 7.83 Mg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
BS13(S)C2e0
Outcome
yield per see0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.83 Mg ha ‐1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Iowa Stiff Stalks Synthetic Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“BS13(S)C2 had the highest yield per se (7.83 Mg ha ‐1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–702 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain BS13(S)C2 had the highest yielding $1 generation, 5.82 Mg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
BS13(S)C2e0
Outcome
yielding $1 generatione1
Direction
higheste1
Value
5.82 Mg ha ‐1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Iowa Stiff Stalks Synthetic Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest yielding $1 generation (5.82 Mg ha ‐1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–758 · show in text ↑
e0

“BS13(S)C2 had the highest yield per se (7.83 Mg ha ‐1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–702 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inbreeding depression for yield was less for highly selected strains and crosses involving them.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
highly selected strainse2
Outcome
Inbreeding depression for yielde2
Direction
lesse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Iowa Stiff Stalks Synthetic Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“Inbreeding depression for yield was less for the highly selected strains and for crosses involving those strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection for resistance to European corn borer did not significantly affect yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Selection for resistance to European corn borere3
Interactor
Ostrinia nubilalis HübnerOstrinia nubilalise3pest
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ostrinia nubilalis
Ostrinia nubilalis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKeith Weller · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Iowa Stiff Stalks Synthetic Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“Selection for resistance to European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner) did not significantly affect yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selection for resistance to corn rootworm had a significant negative correlated effect on grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Selection for resistance to corn rootworme4
Interactor
Diabrotica virgifera Le ConteDiabrotica virgiferae4pest
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
decreaseinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Diabrotica virgifera
Diabrotica virgifera · InteractorTmcelrath · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Iowa Stiff Stalks Synthetic Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e4

“Selection for resistance to corn rootworm ( Diabrotica virgifera Le Conte) did have a significant negative correlated effect on grain yield”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 991–1130 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in frequency of additive effects from yield selection were more important for BSI3(S)C2 than for BSSS(R)C8.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
BSI3(S)C2e5
Outcome
Changes in frequency of additive effectse5
Direction
more importante5
Comparator
BSSS(R)C8e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Iowa Stiff Stalks Synthetic Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“Changes in frequency of additive effects due to selection for yield improvement were more important for BSI3(S)C2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1245 · show in text ↑
e6

“than for BSSS(R)C8 (eight cycles reciprocal recurrent selection)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1363 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in frequency of alleles with dominance effects were greater in BSSS(R)C8 than in BS13(S)C2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
BSSS(R)C8e7
Outcome
frequency of alleles with dominance effectse7
Direction
Greatere7
Comparator
BS13(S)C2e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Iowa Stiff Stalks Synthetic Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e7

“Greater changes were observed in frequency of alleles with dominance effects in BSSS(R)C8 than in BS13(S)C2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rate of realized gain per cycle was 0.279 Mg/ha (4.4%) for BS13(S)C2 after removal of drift.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
BS13(S)C2e1
Outcome
rate of realized gain per cyclee1
Value
0.279 Mg ha ‐1 (4.4%)e1
Qualifier
After removal the effects of drifte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Iowa Stiff Stalks Synthetic Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“After removal the effects of drift, rate of realized gain per cycle was 0.279 Mg ha ‐1 (4.4%) for BS13(S)C2 and 0.259 Mg ha ‐1 (4.1%) for BSSS(R)C8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1621 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rate of realized gain per cycle was 0.259 Mg/ha (4.1%) for BSSS(R)C8 after removal of drift.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
BSSS(R)C8e1
Outcome
rate of realized gain per cyclee1
Value
0.259 Mg ha ‐1 (4.1%)e1
Qualifier
After removal the effects of drifte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Iowa Stiff Stalks Synthetic Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“After removal the effects of drift, rate of realized gain per cycle was 0.279 Mg ha ‐1 (4.4%) for BS13(S)C2 and 0.259 Mg ha ‐1 (4.1%) for BSSS(R)C8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1621 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of the 36 strain crosses ranged from 6.10 Mg/ha to 9.37 Mg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Yield of the 36 strain crossese2
Value
6.10 Mg ha ‐1e2
Qualifier
to 9.37 Mg ha ‐1 for BSSS(R)C8e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Iowa Stiff Stalks Synthetic Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“Yield of the 36 strain crosses ranged from 6.10 Mg ha ‐1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1679 · show in text ↑
e3

“to 9.37 Mg ha ‐1 for BSSS(R)C8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1734 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average midparent heterosis for yield was 11.7% in strain crosses.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
midparent heterosis for yielde4
Value
11.7%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Iowa Stiff Stalks Synthetic Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e4

“Average midparent heterosis for yield was 11.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1795 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · Diabrotica virgifera · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Ostrinia nubilalis · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.