Paper · 1975 · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of sowing rate, irrigation, and nitrogen on the components of yield of spring‐sown semi dwarf and standard New Zealand wheats

C. T. Dougherty; W. R. Scott; R. H. M. Langer

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract ‘Karamu’, a Mexican semidwarf wheat, out yielded ‘Aotea’ and ‘Arawa’ by an average of 20% when spring sown because of better grain set per spikelet and by the formation of more spikelets per ear. Irrigation raised grain yields in all cultivars by increasing tiller survival. Sowing at twice conventional rates depressed grain yields in all cultivars by reducing grain set. Nitrogen fertilisation lowered grain yields of all cultivars by 7% in unirrigated plots by decreasing ear populations, apparently by intensifying water stress. Nitrogen applied at the same rate to irrigated plots increased ear populations and grain yields by 10%. Responses support the hypothesis that poor grain set in wheat in the field is caused by insufficient assimilate supply to the developing ear.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karamu out yielded Aotea and Arawa by an average of 20% when spring sown, because of better grain set per spikelet and more spikelets per ear.

Material
Karamue0
Treatment
when spring sowne0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
out yieldede0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
because of better grain set per spikelet and by the formation of more spikelets per eare0
Comparator
‘Aotea’ and ‘Arawa’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Karamu’, a Mexican semidwarf wheat, out yielded ‘Aotea’ and ‘Arawa’ by an average of 20% when spring sown because of better grain set per spikelet and by the formation of more spikelets per ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation raised grain yields in all cultivars by increasing tiller survival.

Material
all cultivarse1
Treatment
Irrigatione1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
raisede1
Qualifier
by increasing tiller survivale1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a Mexican semidwarf wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation raised grain yields in all cultivars by increasing tiller survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing at twice conventional rates depressed grain yields in all cultivars by reducing grain set.

Material
all cultivarse2
Treatment
Sowing at twice conventional ratese2
Outcome
grain yieldse2
Direction
depressede2
Qualifier
by reducing grain sete2
Comparator
conventional ratese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a Mexican semidwarf wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sowing at twice conventional rates depressed grain yields in all cultivars by reducing grain set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilisation lowered grain yields of all cultivars by 7% in unirrigated plots.

Material
all cultivarse3
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilisatione3
Outcome
grain yieldse3
Direction
lowerede3
Value
7%e3
Qualifier
by decreasing ear populations, apparently by intensifying water stresse3
Setting
unirrigated plotse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a Mexican semidwarf wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nitrogen fertilisation lowered grain yields of all cultivars by 7% in unirrigated plots by decreasing ear populations, apparently by intensifying water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen applied at the same rate to irrigated plots increased ear populations.

Treatment
Nitrogen applied at the same ratee4
Outcome
ear populationse4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
irrigated plotse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a Mexican semidwarf wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrogen applied at the same rate to irrigated plots increased ear populations and grain yields by 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen applied at the same rate to irrigated plots increased grain yields by 10%.

Treatment
Nitrogen applied at the same ratee4
Outcome
grain yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Value
10%e4
Setting
irrigated plotse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a Mexican semidwarf wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–44 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrogen applied at the same rate to irrigated plots increased ear populations and grain yields by 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–644 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The responses support the hypothesis that poor grain set in field wheat is caused by insufficient assimilate supply to the developing ear.

Outcome
grain sete5
Qualifier
insufficient assimilate supply to the developing eare5
Setting
in the fielde5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Responses support the hypothesis that poor grain set in wheat in the field is caused by insufficient assimilate supply to the developing ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–786 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 39 positive, 14 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.