Paper · 2004 · Restoration Ecology

Restoration of a Limestone Quarry: Effect of Soil Amendments on the Establishment of Native Mediterranean Sclerophyllous Shrubs

A. S. Clemente; C. Werner; C. Máguas; et al.

15
claims
22
verbatim quotes
115
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Abstract Limestone quarries are spread over the Mediterranean Basin and have a strong environmental impact on the landscape, causing vegetation losses and soil losses. A reclamation project was conducted in a limestone quarry, situated in Arrábida Natural Park (southwest Portugal), that is dominated by mediterranean vegetation. Revegetation was conducted using three evergreen sclerophyllous shrub species (Ceratonia siliqua, Olea europaea, and Pistacia lentiscus), and new techniques were assayed to improve plant water status and nutrient status during the first phases after plantation. A water‐holding polymer (gel), fertilizer, and mycorrhiza inoculum were applied in a factorial experiment in a randomized complete block design. The success of these techniques was evaluated during 1.5 years, through monitoring of growth and ecophysiology of plants. Plant survival was high, the lowest values (95%) being recorded in C. siliqua. There were species‐specific responses to the treatments applied. Ceratonia siliqua showed the highest growth rates and was the only species with growth stimulated by fertilizer application. However, the application of fertilizer induced changes in leaf characteristics of the other two species, increasing chlorophyll and nitrogen contents. Mycorrhiza inoculum had no effect on plant response. The addition of the water‐holding polymer induced higher midday plant water potentials in C. siliqua, O. europaea, and P. lentiscus, but in the latter two species the simultaneous addition of gel and fertilizer induced the lowest water potentials. The addition of fertilizer and gel is recommended in future revegetation programs but not the combination of both when revegetating with O. europaea and P. lentiscus. The results of this experiment indicate that the use of these mediterranean species, adapted to nutrient and water stress, can circumvent harsh conditions of the quarry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival was high, with the lowest survival of 95% in Ceratonia siliqua.

Taxon
C. siliquaCeratonia siliquae0
Outcome
Plant survivale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ceratonia siliqua
Ceratonia siliqua · TaxonEduardo Milla · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant survival was high, the lowest values (95%) being recorded in C. siliqua.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–937 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ceratonia siliqua had the highest growth rates.

Taxon
Ceratonia siliquaCeratonia siliquae0
Outcome
growth ratese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ceratonia siliqua
Ceratonia siliqua · TaxonEduardo Milla · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ceratonia siliqua showed the highest growth rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer stimulated growth in Ceratonia siliqua.

Taxon
Ceratonia siliquaCeratonia siliquae0
Treatment
fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ceratonia siliqua
Ceratonia siliqua · TaxonEduardo Milla · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ceratonia siliqua showed the highest growth rates and was the only species with growth stimulated by fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer increased chlorophyll and nitrogen in Olea europaea leaves.

Taxon
Olea europaeaOlea europaeae1
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
application of fertilizere0
Outcome
chlorophyll and nitrogen contentse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the application of fertilizer induced changes in leaf characteristics of the other two species, increasing chlorophyll and nitrogen contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1278 · show in text ↑
e1

“Olea europaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer increased chlorophyll and nitrogen in Pistacia lentiscus leaves.

Taxon
Pistacia lentiscusPistacia lentiscuse1
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
application of fertilizere0
Outcome
chlorophyll and nitrogen contentse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pistacia lentiscus
Pistacia lentiscus · TaxonJúlio Reis ( Tintazul ) · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the application of fertilizer induced changes in leaf characteristics of the other two species, increasing chlorophyll and nitrogen contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1278 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pistacia lentiscus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhiza inoculum had no effect on plant response.

Taxon
Ceratonia siliqua, Olea europaea, and Pistacia lentiscusOlea europaeaCeratonia siliquaPistacia lentiscuse1
Treatment
Mycorrhiza inoculume0
Interactor
Mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
plant responsee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceratonia siliqua
Ceratonia siliqua · TaxonEduardo Milla · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pistacia lentiscus
Pistacia lentiscus · TaxonJúlio Reis ( Tintazul ) · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhiza inoculum had no effect on plant response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1331 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ceratonia siliqua, Olea europaea, and Pistacia lentiscus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gel raised midday water potential in C. siliqua.

Taxon
C. siliquaCeratonia siliquae0
Treatment
water‐holding polymere0
Outcome
midday plant water potentialse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ceratonia siliqua
Ceratonia siliqua · TaxonEduardo Milla · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of the water‐holding polymer induced higher midday plant water potentials in C. siliqua, O. europaea, and P. lentiscus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gel raised midday water potential in O. europaea.

Taxon
O. europaeaOlea europaeae0
Treatment
water‐holding polymere0
Outcome
midday plant water potentialse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of the water‐holding polymer induced higher midday plant water potentials in C. siliqua, O. europaea, and P. lentiscus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gel raised midday water potential in P. lentiscus.

Taxon
P. lentiscusPistacia lentiscuse0
Treatment
water‐holding polymere0
Outcome
midday plant water potentialse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pistacia lentiscus
Pistacia lentiscus · TaxonJúlio Reis ( Tintazul ) · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of the water‐holding polymer induced higher midday plant water potentials in C. siliqua, O. europaea, and P. lentiscus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined gel and fertilizer produced the lowest water potential in O. europaea.

Taxon
O. europaeaOlea europaeae1
Treatment
simultaneous addition of gel and fertilizere0
Outcome
water potentialse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but in the latter two species the simultaneous addition of gel and fertilizer induced the lowest water potentials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1578 · show in text ↑
e1

“C. siliqua, O. europaea, and P. lentiscus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined gel and fertilizer produced the lowest water potential in P. lentiscus.

Taxon
P. lentiscusPistacia lentiscuse1
Treatment
simultaneous addition of gel and fertilizere0
Outcome
water potentialse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pistacia lentiscus
Pistacia lentiscus · TaxonJúlio Reis ( Tintazul ) · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but in the latter two species the simultaneous addition of gel and fertilizer induced the lowest water potentials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1578 · show in text ↑
e1

“O. europaea, and P. lentiscus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1463 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend fertilizer and gel for future revegetation.

Taxon
Ceratonia siliqua, Olea europaea, and Pistacia lentiscusOlea europaeaCeratonia siliquaPistacia lentiscuse1
Outcome
addition of fertilizer and gele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceratonia siliqua
Ceratonia siliqua · TaxonEduardo Milla · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pistacia lentiscus
Pistacia lentiscus · TaxonJúlio Reis ( Tintazul ) · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of fertilizer and gel is recommended in future revegetation programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1661 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ceratonia siliqua, Olea europaea, and Pistacia lentiscus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–465 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise against combining gel and fertilizer for O. europaea.

Taxon
O. europaeaOlea europaeae0
Outcome
not the combination of bothe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not the combination of both when revegetating with O. europaea and P. lentiscus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1745 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise against combining gel and fertilizer for P. lentiscus.

Taxon
P. lentiscusPistacia lentiscuse0
Outcome
not the combination of bothe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pistacia lentiscus
Pistacia lentiscus · TaxonJúlio Reis ( Tintazul ) · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not the combination of both when revegetating with O. europaea and P. lentiscus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1745 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These Mediterranean species can establish despite harsh quarry conditions.

Taxon
Ceratonia siliqua, Olea europaea, and Pistacia lentiscusOlea europaeaCeratonia siliquaPistacia lentiscuse1
Outcome
circumvent harsh conditions of the quarrye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceratonia siliqua
Ceratonia siliqua · TaxonEduardo Milla · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pistacia lentiscus
Pistacia lentiscus · TaxonJúlio Reis ( Tintazul ) · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of these mediterranean species, adapted to nutrient and water stress, can circumvent harsh conditions of the quarry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1915 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ceratonia siliqua, Olea europaea, and Pistacia lentiscus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–465 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · growth · Ceratonia siliqua (carob)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.