Paper · 2013 · Acta Agrobotanica

Free proline accumulation in leaves of cultivated plant species under water deficit conditions

Hanna Bandurska

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of water deficit caused by soil drought on the content of free proline as well as the degree of cell membrane damages in the leaves of three cultivated plant species having different farm usefulness and water requirements have been studied. The used pIants were: poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd., 'Regina' and 'Cortez') grown for decorative purposes, a green vegetable of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis, subvar. cymosa, 'Colonel' and 'Marathon') and a cereal plant of barley (the wild form Hordeum spontaneumm and Hordeum vulgaree 'Maresi'). The examined species differed in the size of the experienced stress. the Iargest RWC reduction was found iii broccoli leaves, while somewhat smaller - in barley. In poinsettia leaves, the reduction of RWC level was not large or did not occur at all. The accumulation of free proline in the species under study was also variable. The largest amount of this amino acid tended to accumulate in broccoli leaves, whereas the increase of its level took place only at a strong dehydration of tissues. The increase of proline level was smaller in barley leaves than in broccoli, but that was found already at a smalI dehydration of tissues. In poinsettia leaves, a several f`old increase of proline level was found at the early stage of the stress. The level of that amino acid gradually increased at consecutive times and did not depend on tissue dehydration. Damage of cell membranes amounted to 8.5-9.5% in barley leaves, about 3% in brocolli and to 0-2.6% in poinsettia. The role of proline in prevention of leaf dehydration and in alleviation of dehydration effects in the studied species has been discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest relative water content reduction under water deficit was in broccoli leaves, somewhat smaller in barley.

Organ / stage
leavese4
Treatment
water deficit caused by soil droughte2
Outcome
RWCe4
Direction
reductione4
Comparator
barleye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a green vegetable of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis, subvar. cymosa, 'Colonel' and 'Marathon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–475 · show in text ↑
e2

“water deficit caused by soil drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“the Iargest RWC reduction was found iii broccoli leaves, while somewhat smaller - in barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–732 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In poinsettia leaves under water deficit, the relative water content reduction was not large or did not occur at all.

Organ / stage
leavese5
Treatment
water deficit caused by soil droughte2
Outcome
reduction of RWC levele5
Qualifier
not large or did not occur at alle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia pulcherrima
Euphorbia pulcherrima · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd., 'Regina' and 'Cortez') grown for decorative purposes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–368 · show in text ↑
e2

“water deficit caused by soil drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
e5

“In poinsettia leaves, the reduction of RWC level was not large or did not occur at all”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli leaves tended to accumulate the largest amount of free proline under water deficit, with the increase only at strong dehydration.

Treatment
water deficit caused by soil droughte2
Compound
free prolinee7
Outcome
amount of this amino acide6
Direction
accumulatee6
Qualifier
only at a strong dehydration of tissuese6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a green vegetable of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis, subvar. cymosa, 'Colonel' and 'Marathon')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–475 · show in text ↑
e2

“water deficit caused by soil drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
e6

“The largest amount of this amino acid tended to accumulate in broccoli leaves, whereas the increase of its level took place only at a strong dehydration of tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1064 · show in text ↑
e7

“The accumulation of free proline in the species under study was also variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proline level increase in barley leaves was smaller than in broccoli and was found already at small dehydration.

Organ / stage
leavese3
Treatment
water deficit caused by soil droughte2
Outcome
proline levele3
Direction
increasee3
Qualifier
found already at a smalI dehydration of tissuese3
Comparator
broccolie3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“water deficit caused by soil drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
e3

“The increase of proline level was smaller in barley leaves than in broccoli, but that was found already at a smalI dehydration of tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poinsettia leaves showed a several-fold increase of proline level at the early stage of stress.

Organ / stage
leavese3
Treatment
water deficit caused by soil droughte2
Compound
free prolinee7
Outcome
proline levele3
Direction
increasee3
Value
several f`olde3
Qualifier
at the early stage of the stresse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia pulcherrima
Euphorbia pulcherrima · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“water deficit caused by soil drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
e7

“The accumulation of free proline in the species under study was also variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–899 · show in text ↑
e3

“In poinsettia leaves, a several f`old increase of proline level was found at the early stage of the stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proline level in poinsettia increased gradually over consecutive times, independent of tissue dehydration.

Treatment
water deficit caused by soil droughte2
Outcome
level of that amino acide3
Direction
gradually increasede3
Qualifier
did not depend on tissue dehydratione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia pulcherrima
Euphorbia pulcherrima · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd., 'Regina' and 'Cortez') grown for decorative purposes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–368 · show in text ↑
e2

“water deficit caused by soil drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–50 · show in text ↑
e3

“The level of that amino acid gradually increased at consecutive times and did not depend on tissue dehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1423 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell membrane damage in barley leaves amounted to 8.5-9.5%.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
Damage of cell membranese0
Value
8.5-9.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damage of cell membranes amounted to 8.5-9.5% in barley leaves, about 3% in brocolli and to 0-2.6% in poinsettia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell membrane damage in broccoli amounted to about 3%.

Taxon
brocollie0
Outcome
Damage of cell membranese0
Value
about 3%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Damage of cell membranes amounted to 8.5-9.5% in barley leaves, about 3% in brocolli and to 0-2.6% in poinsettia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell membrane damage in poinsettia amounted to 0-2.6%.

Outcome
Damage of cell membranese0
Value
0-2.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia pulcherrima
Euphorbia pulcherrima · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damage of cell membranes amounted to 8.5-9.5% in barley leaves, about 3% in brocolli and to 0-2.6% in poinsettia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1537 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.