Paper · 1990 · Journal of Applied Bacteriology

Development and growth effects in the Sorghum–Azospirillum association

R.S. Pacovsky

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sorghum plants were inoculated with a pigmented strain of Azospirillum brasilense (Cd) or were not inoculated and received an N‐amended nutrient solution (1.0 mmol/l NH 4 NO 3 ). A third set of plants were non‐inoculated and not fertilized with N (control). Plants were grown in a steam‐sterilized, low‐fertility soil and harvested after growing for 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 weeks. Dry weights for Azospirillum ‐inoculated plants were significantly greater than the N‐fertilized sorghum at weeks 2 and 4, but A. brasilense ‐colonized plants weighed significantly less than the N‐fertilized sorghum at weeks 8 and 10. Shoot and root N concentrations increased for N‐amended plants but remained fairly steady for sorghum inoculated with strain Cd indicating enhanced N‐use efficiency in plants colonized with the endophyte. In general, the concentration of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in Azospirillum ‐colonized plants was relatively less than that in N‐amended sorghum early in ontogeny when the growth rate of the inoculated plants was greatest. The number of inoculated Cd cells per plant was correlated with percentage increase in dry weight ( r = 0.92*) or total N content ( r = 0.93*) relative to the N‐fertilized plants. Growth enhancement relative to N‐fertilized sorghum was not observed when the number of Azospirillum cells per gram of root dropped below 1.0 x 10 5 (or 3.0 x 10 6 cells/plant). Therefore, the persistence of Azospirillum in the endorhizosphere of sorghum had a direct impact on host growth, physiology and nutrition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum-inoculated sorghum had greater dry weights than N-fertilized sorghum at weeks 2 and 4.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Treatment
inoculated with a pigmented strain of Azospirillum brasilensee0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
Dry weightse1
Direction
greatere1
Qualifier
at weeks 2 and 4e1
Comparator
N‐fertilized sorghume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum plants were inoculated with a pigmented strain of Azospirillum brasilense (Cd)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dry weights for Azospirillum ‐inoculated plants were significantly greater than the N‐fertilized sorghum at weeks 2 and 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum-colonized sorghum weighed less than N-fertilized sorghum at weeks 8 and 10.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Treatment
inoculated with a pigmented strain of Azospirillum brasilensee0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
weighede2
Direction
lesse2
Qualifier
at weeks 8 and 10e2
Comparator
N‐fertilized sorghume2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum plants were inoculated with a pigmented strain of Azospirillum brasilense (Cd)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“A. brasilense ‐colonized plants weighed significantly less than the N‐fertilized sorghum at weeks 8 and 10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot and root N concentrations increased in N-amended sorghum.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Treatment
N‐amended plantse3
Outcome
Shoot and root N concentrationse3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum plants were inoculated with a pigmented strain of Azospirillum brasilense (Cd)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e3

“Shoot and root N concentrations increased for N‐amended plants but remained fairly steady for sorghum inoculated with strain Cd indicating enhanced N‐use efficiency in plants colonized with the endophyte”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot and root N concentrations remained fairly steady in sorghum inoculated with strain Cd.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Treatment
sorghum inoculated with strain Cde3
Outcome
Shoot and root N concentrationse3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum plants were inoculated with a pigmented strain of Azospirillum brasilense (Cd)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e3

“Shoot and root N concentrations increased for N‐amended plants but remained fairly steady for sorghum inoculated with strain Cd indicating enhanced N‐use efficiency in plants colonized with the endophyte”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–813 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum colonized by the endophyte showed enhanced N-use efficiency.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Interactor
endophytee3symbiont
Outcome
N‐use efficiencye3
Direction
enhancede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum plants were inoculated with a pigmented strain of Azospirillum brasilense (Cd)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e3

“Shoot and root N concentrations increased for N‐amended plants but remained fairly steady for sorghum inoculated with strain Cd indicating enhanced N‐use efficiency in plants colonized with the endophyte”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum-colonized sorghum had lower Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu concentrations than N-amended sorghum early in ontogeny.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume4
Treatment
Azospirillum ‐colonized plantse4
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume4symbiont
Outcome
concentration of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cue4
Direction
lesse4
Qualifier
early in ontogenye4
Comparator
N‐amended sorghume4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In general, the concentration of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in Azospirillum ‐colonized plants was relatively less than that in N‐amended sorghum early in ontogeny when the growth rate of the inoculated plants was greatest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1027 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percentage increase in dry weight was correlated with the number of inoculated Cd cells per plant (r = 0.92).

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Outcome
percentage increase in dry weighte5
Value
r = 0.92*e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum plants were inoculated with a pigmented strain of Azospirillum brasilense (Cd)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e5

“The number of inoculated Cd cells per plant was correlated with percentage increase in dry weight ( r = 0.92*) or total N content ( r = 0.93*) relative to the N‐fertilized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of inoculated Cd cells per plant was correlated with total N content (r = 0.93).

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Outcome
total N contente5
Value
r = 0.93*e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum plants were inoculated with a pigmented strain of Azospirillum brasilense (Cd)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 · show in text ↑
e5

“The number of inoculated Cd cells per plant was correlated with percentage increase in dry weight ( r = 0.92*) or total N content ( r = 0.93*) relative to the N‐fertilized plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth enhancement was not observed when Azospirillum cells per gram of root dropped below 1.0 x 10 5.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume6
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume6symbiont
Outcome
Growth enhancemente6
Value
1.0 x 10 5e6
Qualifier
cells per gram of roote6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Growth enhancement relative to N‐fertilized sorghum was not observed when the number of Azospirillum cells per gram of root dropped below 1.0 x 10 5 (or 3.0 x 10 6 cells/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1385 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Persistence of Azospirillum in the endorhizosphere had a direct impact on sorghum host growth, physiology and nutrition.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume7
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume7symbiont
Outcome
host growth, physiology and nutritione7
Qualifier
persistence of Azospirillum in the endorhizospheree7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“the persistence of Azospirillum in the endorhizosphere of sorghum had a direct impact on host growth, physiology and nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1524 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Azospirillum brasilense · growth · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

inoculation · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

76 papers: 65 positive, 11 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.