Paper · 2000 · Agronomy Journal

Wheat and Maize Yields in Response to Straw Management and Nitrogen under a Bed Planting System

Agustin Limon‐Ortega; Kenneth D. Sayre; Charles A. Francis

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
63
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the Yaqui Valley, northwest Mexico, the crop sequence that is becoming more common consists of planting wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) as a winter crop on a raised bed followed by maize ( Zea mays L.) as a summer crop. In this area, straw of both winter and summer crops is commonly burned. The consequences of burning crop residues on crop yields in the Yaqui Valley have not previously been documented, and alternative practices have not been proposed. A 5‐yr study was conducted at the CIANO (Centro de Investigaciones Agrı́colas del Noroeste) experiment station in Sonora, Mexico, to compare the effects of burning with other straw management strategies on wheat and maize yields. We tested two tillage systems (conventional‐tilled bed, CTB, and permanent bed, PB), five straw management treatments (incorporated with CTB and straw as stubble, partly removed, removed, or burned with PB), and seven N treatments, five applied preplant (0, 75, 150, 225, and 300 kg N ha −1 ) and two at the 1st node stage (150 and 300 kg N ha −1 ) of wheat. Maize following wheat received a uniform application of 150 kg N ha −1 . The combination of PB and straw as stubble produced superior maize and wheat grain yields in high‐yielding environments; in low‐yielding environments, PB–straw burned produced greater wheat grain yields. Nitrogen fertilizer application of 150 and 300 kg N ha −1 at the 1st node stage of wheat increased grain yields compared with preplant N fertilizer applications. Permanent beds combined with retaining all crop residues in the soil as stubble have the potential to increase both wheat and maize yields in the Yaqui Valley.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent beds with straw stubble produced superior maize grain yields in high-yielding environments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
PB and straw as stubblee0
Outcome
maize and wheat grain yieldse0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
high‐yielding environmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of PB and straw as stubble produced superior maize and wheat grain yields in high‐yielding environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent beds with straw stubble produced superior wheat grain yields in high-yielding environments.

Treatment
PB and straw as stubblee0
Outcome
wheat grain yieldse0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
high‐yielding environmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of PB and straw as stubble produced superior maize and wheat grain yields in high‐yielding environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent beds with burned straw increased wheat grain yield in low-yielding environments.

Treatment
PB–straw burnede0
Outcome
wheat grain yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
low‐yielding environmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in low‐yielding environments, PB–straw burned produced greater wheat grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application at the first node stage increased wheat grain yield versus preplant application.

Treatment
150 and 300 kg N ha −1 at the 1st node stagee0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
preplant N fertilizer applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilizer application of 150 and 300 kg N ha −1 at the 1st node stage of wheat increased grain yields compared with preplant N fertilizer applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1483 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent beds retaining crop residues as stubble may increase wheat yields in the Yaqui Valley.

Treatment
Permanent beds combined with retaining all crop residues in the soil as stubblee0
Outcome
increase both wheat and maize yieldse0
Setting
Yaqui Valleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Permanent beds combined with retaining all crop residues in the soil as stubble have the potential to increase both wheat and maize yields in the Yaqui Valley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1643 · show in text ↑

fire · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.