Paper · 2014 · The Scientific World JOURNAL

Ethylene Response FactorSl-ERF.B.3Is Responsive to Abiotic Stresses and Mediates Salt and Cold Stress Response Regulation in Tomato

Imen Klay; Julien Pirrello; Leila Riahi; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
89
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sl-ERF.B.3 (Solanum lycopersicum ethylene response factor B.3) gene encodes for a tomato transcription factor of the ERF (ethylene responsive factor) family. Our results of real-time RT-PCR showed that Sl-ERF.B.3 is an abiotic stress responsive gene, which is induced by cold, heat, and flooding, but downregulated by salinity and drought. To get more insight into the role of Sl-ERF.B.3 in plant response to separate salinity and cold, a comparative study between wild type and two Sl-ERF.B.3 antisense transgenic tomato lines was achieved. Compared with wild type, Sl-ERF.B.3 antisense transgenic plants exhibited a salt stress dependent growth inhibition. This inhibition was significantly enhanced in shoots but reduced in roots, leading to an increased root to shoot ratio. Furthermore, the cold stress essay clearly revealed that introducing antisense Sl-ERF.B.3 in transgenic tomato plants reduces their cell injury and enhances their tolerance against 14 d of cold stress. All these results suggest that Sl-ERF.B.3 gene is involved in plant response to abiotic stresses and may play a role in the layout of stress symptoms under cold stress and in growth regulation under salinity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sl-ERF.B.3 expression was induced by cold, heat and flooding.

Treatment
cold, heat, and floodinge0
Gene
Sl-ERF.B.3e0
Outcome
Sl-ERF.B.3e0
Direction
inducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sl-ERF.B.3 is an abiotic stress responsive gene, which is induced by cold, heat, and flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antisense Sl-ERF.B.3 tomato plants had salt-dependent growth inhibition versus wild type.

Treatment
Sl-ERF.B.3 antisense transgenic plantse0
Outcome
growth inhibitione0
Direction
inhibitione0
Comparator
wild typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with wild type, Sl-ERF.B.3 antisense transgenic plants exhibited a salt stress dependent growth inhibition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth inhibition in antisense plants was significantly enhanced in shoots.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This inhibition was significantly enhanced in shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth inhibition in antisense plants was reduced in roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
growth inhibitione1
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but reduced in roots, leading to an increased root to shoot ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with wild type, Sl-ERF.B.3 antisense transgenic plants exhibited a salt stress dependent growth inhibition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–658 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antisense plants had an increased root to shoot ratio.

Outcome
root to shoot ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leading to an increased root to shoot ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antisense Sl-ERF.B.3 reduced cell injury after 14 days of cold stress.

Treatment
introducing antisense Sl-ERF.B.3e0
Outcome
cell injurye0
Direction
reducese0
Qualifier
14 d of cold stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“introducing antisense Sl-ERF.B.3 in transgenic tomato plants reduces their cell injury and enhances their tolerance against 14 d of cold stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antisense Sl-ERF.B.3 enhanced tomato tolerance after 14 days of cold stress.

Treatment
introducing antisense Sl-ERF.B.3e0
Outcome
tolerancee0
Direction
enhancese0
Qualifier
14 d of cold stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“introducing antisense Sl-ERF.B.3 in transgenic tomato plants reduces their cell injury and enhances their tolerance against 14 d of cold stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–980 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest Sl-ERF.B.3 participates in abiotic stress response and regulation of salt-stressed growth.

Gene
Sl-ERF.B.3e0
Outcome
growth regulation under salinitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sl-ERF.B.3 gene is involved in plant response to abiotic stresses and may play a role in the layout of stress symptoms under cold stress and in growth regulation under salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑

loss of function · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 63 positive, 92 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 92 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

loss of function · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.