Paper · 2007 · Biologia Plantarum

Effects of elevated ozone on chlorophyll a fluorescence in symptomatic and asymptomatic leaves of two tomato genotypes

E. Degl'Innocenti; L. Guidi; G. F. Soldatini

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two different genotypes of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. (cv. Cuor di Bue, O3-sensitive and line 93.1033/1, O3-resistant) were treated with a single dose of ozone (150 mm3 m-3 for 3 h). The PS 2 activity was examined by measurements of chlorophyll a fluorescence on symptomatic and asymptomatic leaves. Symptoms were evident on the 4th leaves from the bottom, in both genotypes, while the 2nd leaves of the line 93.1033/1 were asymptomatic. In these leaves, the net photosynthetic rate (PN) did not change even if the Fv/Fm ratio significantly decreased. A strong reduction in PN, mostly due to the stomatal closure, was observed in Cuor di Bue. The non photochemical quenching coefficient (qNP) and the degree of PS 2 reaction centres closure (1-qP) were higher, while the quantum efficiency of PS 2 photochemistry (ΦPS2) and quantum efficiency of excitation energy capture (Φexc.) were lower in O3 treated leaves of both genotypes. The limitation of photosynthesis was shown also by a decrease in the parameter %P, which diminished compared to controls in both genotypes. The response of the two genotypes for the energy fraction dissipated as thermal energy in the PS 2 antennae (%D) was similar. The fraction of %P remained lower during the recovery in symptomatic leaves of the resistant line as compared to the controls, whereas %X, which represents the amount of light energy that is not utilized in photochemistry or dissipated in the PS 2 antennae, significantly rose in the asymptomatic leaves of this line and in both the leaves of Cuor di Bue. From data obtained we concluded that ozone affected the plants independently on the appearance of visible symptoms of injury because the leaves without visible symptoms of both the genotypes were negatively influenced.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone caused visible symptoms on fourth leaves in both genotypes.

Material
both genotypese0
Organ / stage
4th leaves from the bottome0
Outcome
Symptoms were evidente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Symptoms were evident on the 4th leaves from the bottom, in both genotypes, while the 2nd leaves of the line 93.1033/1 were asymptomatic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“two tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second leaves of resistant line 93.1033/1 remained asymptomatic.

Material
line 93.1033/1e0
Organ / stage
2nd leavese0
Outcome
asymptomatice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Symptoms were evident on the 4th leaves from the bottom, in both genotypes, while the 2nd leaves of the line 93.1033/1 were asymptomatic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“two tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthetic rate did not change in the asymptomatic leaves.

Organ / stage
these leavese0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (PN)e0
Direction
did not changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In these leaves, the net photosynthetic rate (PN) did not change even if the Fv/Fm ratio significantly decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“two tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv/Fm decreased significantly in asymptomatic leaves.

Organ / stage
these leavese0
Outcome
Fv/Fm ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In these leaves, the net photosynthetic rate (PN) did not change even if the Fv/Fm ratio significantly decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“two tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–118 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthetic rate decreased strongly in Cuor di Bue, mostly due to stomatal closure.

Material
Cuor di Buee0
Outcome
PNe0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
mostly due to the stomatal closuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A strong reduction in PN, mostly due to the stomatal closure, was observed in Cuor di Bue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“two tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone increased qNP and reaction centre closure in both genotypes.

Treatment
O3e0
Outcome
non photochemical quenching coefficient (qNP) and the degree of PS 2 reaction centres closure (1-qP)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The non photochemical quenching coefficient (qNP) and the degree of PS 2 reaction centres closure (1-qP) were higher, while the quantum efficiency of PS 2 photochemistry (ΦPS2) and quantum efficiency of excitation energy capture (Φexc.) were lower in O3 treated leaves of both genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“two tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone decreased both PS2 photochemical efficiencies in both genotypes.

Treatment
O3e0
Outcome
quantum efficiency of PS 2 photochemistry (ΦPS2) and quantum efficiency of excitation energy capture (Φexc.)e0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The non photochemical quenching coefficient (qNP) and the degree of PS 2 reaction centres closure (1-qP) were higher, while the quantum efficiency of PS 2 photochemistry (ΦPS2) and quantum efficiency of excitation energy capture (Φexc.) were lower in O3 treated leaves of both genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“two tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone decreased %P relative to controls in both genotypes.

Outcome
%Pe0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
controlse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The limitation of photosynthesis was shown also by a decrease in the parameter %P, which diminished compared to controls in both genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“two tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The genotypes had similar responses for thermal energy dissipation in PS2 antennae.

Outcome
energy fraction dissipated as thermal energy in the PS 2 antennae (%D)e0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The response of the two genotypes for the energy fraction dissipated as thermal energy in the PS 2 antennae (%D) was similar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“two tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

%P remained lower during recovery in symptomatic leaves of the resistant line than controls.

Organ / stage
symptomatic leavese0
Outcome
%Pe0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
during the recoverye0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fraction of %P remained lower during the recovery in symptomatic leaves of the resistant line as compared to the controls, whereas %X, which represents the amount of light energy that is not utilized in photochemistry or dissipated in the PS 2 antennae, significantly rose in the asymptomatic leaves of this line and in both the leaves of Cuor di Bue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“two tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

%X rose significantly in asymptomatic leaves of the resistant line and both leaves of Cuor di Bue.

Organ / stage
asymptomatic leavese0
Outcome
%Xe0
Direction
rosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fraction of %P remained lower during the recovery in symptomatic leaves of the resistant line as compared to the controls, whereas %X, which represents the amount of light energy that is not utilized in photochemistry or dissipated in the PS 2 antennae, significantly rose in the asymptomatic leaves of this line and in both the leaves of Cuor di Bue.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“two tomato genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–118 · show in text ↑

ozone · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.