Paper · 1984 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Nitrogen Fertilization Practices for Sequential Cropping of Wheat, Turnips, and Sweet Corn

M. Sanmaneechai; F. E. Koehler; S. Roberts

14
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The fertilizer requirement for multiple or sequential cropping needs to be better defined. Therefore, a three‐crop field experiment was conducted on a Warden silt loam (coarse‐silty, mixed mesic, Xerollic Camborthids) to study the effects of preplant soil mineral N and rates of applied N on yield and N uptake by spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), turnips ( Brassica rapa L.), and sweet corn ( Zea mays L.). Spring wheat and turnips were grown sequentially in 1979 followed by sweet corn in 1980. Wheat yield was not significantly increased with over 135 kg N/ha, but near maximum yield of 7.5 Mg/ha on the yield curve was at 180 kg N/ha. The concentration of N in the straw and grain continued to increase with N rates of 180 and 270 kg/ha. Yield of turnips (roots plus tops) which reached 5.8 Mg/ha and N uptake increased with increasing N rates up to the maximum use of 270 kg/ha. Only the highest rate of N applied for wheat significantly increased yield and N uptake of the following turnip crop. Sweet corn yields increased to 23 Mg/ha with increasing N rates up to 135 kg/ha, and then leveled off, whereas N uptake increased up to 180 kg N/ha. Residual effects from N applied for previous crops increased yield and N uptake of sweet corn. Responses by corn to residual N were greatest where N was applied for both wheat and turnips and least where N was applied for spring wheat only. It was concluded that turnips benefited less than sweet corn from residual and mineralizable N. The total N uptake by three crops exceeded the amount of N applied showing that N mineralization during crop growth was an important factor in the N uptake by the crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield did not significantly increase above 135 kg N/ha.

Treatment
over 135 kg N/hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not significantly increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yield was not significantly increased with over 135 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–575 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat near maximum yield was 7.5 Mg/ha at 180 kg N/ha.

Treatment
180 kg N/hae0
Outcome
maximum yielde0
Value
7.5 Mg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“near maximum yield of 7.5 Mg/ha on the yield curve was at 180 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat straw and grain nitrogen concentration rose with rates of 180 and 270 kg/ha.

Treatment
N rates of 180 and 270 kg/hae0
Outcome
concentration of N in the straw and graine0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of N in the straw and grain continued to increase with N rates of 180 and 270 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turnip yield reached 5.8 Mg/ha under increasing N rates through 270 kg/ha.

Treatment
increasing N rates up to the maximum use of 270 kg/hae0
Outcome
Yield of turnips (roots plus tops)e0
Value
5.8 Mg/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of turnips (roots plus tops) which reached 5.8 Mg/ha and N uptake increased with increasing N rates up to the maximum use of 270 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turnip N uptake increased through 270 kg/ha N.

Treatment
increasing N rates up to the maximum use of 270 kg/hae0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake increased with increasing N rates up to the maximum use of 270 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Turnips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the highest wheat N rate significantly increased subsequent turnip yield and uptake.

Treatment
highest rate of N applied for wheate0
Outcome
yield and N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only the highest rate of N applied for wheat significantly increased yield and N uptake of the following turnip crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn yield increased to 23 Mg/ha through 135 kg/ha N.

Taxon
Sweet corne0
Treatment
increasing N rates up to 135 kg/hae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23 Mg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet corn yields increased to 23 Mg/ha with increasing N rates up to 135 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn yield then leveled off at higher N rates.

Taxon
Sweet corne0
Treatment
increasing N rates up to 135 kg/hae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
leveled offe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet corn yields increased to 23 Mg/ha with increasing N rates up to 135 kg/ha, and then leveled off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn N uptake rose through 180 kg N/ha.

Taxon
Sweet cornt0
Treatment
180 kg N/hae0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake increased up to 180 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual N from previous crops increased sweet corn yield and N uptake.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
N applied for previous cropse0
Outcome
yield and N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Residual effects from N applied for previous crops increased yield and N uptake of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1257 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn response to residual N was greatest after N applications to both wheat and turnips and least after wheat alone.

Outcome
Responses by corn to residual Ne0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
where N was applied for both wheat and turnips and least where N was applied for spring wheat onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Responses by corn to residual N were greatest where N was applied for both wheat and turnips and least where N was applied for spring wheat only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1403 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turnips benefited less than sweet corn from residual and mineralizable N.

Outcome
benefited lesse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
sweet corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. rapa
Brassica rapa subsp. rapa · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“turnips benefited less than sweet corn from residual and mineralizable N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1499 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total N uptake by the three crops exceeded applied N.

Taxon
Wheat, Turnips, and Sweet Cornt0
Outcome
total N uptake by three cropse0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
amount of N appliede0

Verbatim

e0

“The total N uptake by three crops exceeded the amount of N applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat, Turnips, and Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–90 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed part of crop N uptake to mineralization during growth.

Taxon
Wheat, Turnips, and Sweet Cornt0
Outcome
N uptake by the cropse0
Qualifier
N mineralization during crop growthe0

Verbatim

e0

“N mineralization during crop growth was an important factor in the N uptake by the crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1669 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat, Turnips, and Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–90 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 37 positive, 6 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

489 papers: 403 positive, 86 negative or no effect

402 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

485 papers more in this group

See all 489 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.