Paper · 1988 · Soil Science & Plant Nutrition

Effect of phosphorus and pH on dry matter production, dinitrogen fixation and critical phosphorus concentration in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan(L) millsp.)

Shoitsu Ogata; Joseph Adu-Gyamfi; Kounosuke Fujita

17
claims
35
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract A pot experiment was conducted under greenhouse conditions during the summer to determine the effect of the P content and pH of the culture medium on dry matter production, dinitrogen fixation, and critical P concentration in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp.) 1. Dry weight in plant parts increased with increasing P application rates. Whole plant weight did not increase significantly above the 0.50 g/pot P application at 92 days while it increased rapidly up to 5.0 g/pot P application at 132 days. At low P levels (0–0.5 g/pot) differences in the whole plant weight with respect to the pH were not significant but at high P levels (2.5 and 5.0 g/pot) the whole plant weight of the plants cultured at pH 6 was slightly higher than that of the plants culture at pH 4. The highest pod weight was achieved at pH 4.2. P application significantly increased the nodule weight and dinitrogen fixation. At a given P level, the acetylene reduction activity tended to be higher in the pH 4 plants than in the pH 6.3. The critical P concentrations on a dry weight basis at 92 days in plant tops, leaves, pods, stems, and roots were 0.15, 0.13, 0.27, 0.05, and 0.09%, respectively. Values were almost similar at pH 4 and 6. However, critical P concentrations were not clearly observed at 132 days.4. At the green maturity stage, P absorbed was mainly distributed to pods. The amount of P translocated from the leaves to the growing pods and grains was higher at low P levels than at high P levels after anthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant-part dry weight increased with P application.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
P application ratese0
Outcome
Dry weight in plant partse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry weight in plant parts increased with increasing P application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 92 days, whole-plant weight did not increase significantly above 0.50 g/pot P.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
0.50 g/pot P applicatione0
Outcome
Whole plant weighte0
Direction
did not increasee0
Qualifier
92 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Whole plant weight did not increase significantly above the 0.50 g/pot P application at 92 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 132 days, whole-plant weight rose rapidly up to 5.0 g/pot P.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
5.0 g/pot P applicatione0
Outcome
Whole plant weighte1
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
132 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased rapidly up to 5.0 g/pot P application at 132 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–515 · show in text ↑
e1

“Whole plant weight did not increase significantly above the 0.50 g/pot P application at 92 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At low P, pH had no significant effect on whole-plant weight.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pHe0
Outcome
whole plant weighte0
Qualifier
low P levels (0–0.5 g/pot)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At low P levels (0–0.5 g/pot) differences in the whole plant weight with respect to the pH were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–627 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high P, pH 6 gave slightly higher whole-plant weight than pH 4.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pH 6e0
Outcome
whole plant weighte0
Direction
slightly highere0
Qualifier
high P levels (2.5 and 5.0 g/pot)e0
Comparator
pH 4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at high P levels (2.5 and 5.0 g/pot) the whole plant weight of the plants cultured at pH 6 was slightly higher than that of the plants culture at pH 4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod weight was highest at pH 4.2.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pH 4.2e0
Outcome
pod weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest pod weight was achieved at pH 4.2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P significantly increased nodule weight and dinitrogen fixation.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
P applicatione0
Outcome
nodule weight and dinitrogen fixatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P application significantly increased the nodule weight and dinitrogen fixation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At given P, acetylene reduction tended to be higher at pH 4 than pH 6.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pH 4e0
Outcome
acetylene reduction activitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
given P levele0
Comparator
pH 6.3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At a given P level, the acetylene reduction activity tended to be higher in the pH 4 plants than in the pH 6.3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 92 days, critical P concentrations were 0.15% in plant tops.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Organ / stage
plant topse0
Outcome
critical P concentrationse0
Value
0.15e0
Qualifier
92 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical P concentrations on a dry weight basis at 92 days in plant tops, leaves, pods, stems, and roots were 0.15, 0.13, 0.27, 0.05, and 0.09%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 92 days, critical P concentration was 0.13% in leaves.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
critical P concentrationse0
Value
0.13e0
Qualifier
92 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical P concentrations on a dry weight basis at 92 days in plant tops, leaves, pods, stems, and roots were 0.15, 0.13, 0.27, 0.05, and 0.09%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 92 days, critical P concentration was 0.27% in pods.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Organ / stage
podse0
Outcome
critical P concentrationse0
Value
0.27e0
Qualifier
92 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical P concentrations on a dry weight basis at 92 days in plant tops, leaves, pods, stems, and roots were 0.15, 0.13, 0.27, 0.05, and 0.09%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 92 days, critical P concentration was 0.05% in stems.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
critical P concentrationse0
Value
0.05e0
Qualifier
92 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical P concentrations on a dry weight basis at 92 days in plant tops, leaves, pods, stems, and roots were 0.15, 0.13, 0.27, 0.05, and 0.09%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 92 days, critical P concentration was 0.09% in roots.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
critical P concentrationse0
Value
0.09%e0
Qualifier
92 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical P concentrations on a dry weight basis at 92 days in plant tops, leaves, pods, stems, and roots were 0.15, 0.13, 0.27, 0.05, and 0.09%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical P concentrations were nearly similar at pH 4 and 6.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
Valuese0
Direction
almost similare0
Comparator
pH 4 and 6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Values were almost similar at pH 4 and 6.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical P concentrations were not clearly observed at 132 days.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Outcome
critical P concentrationse0
Qualifier
132 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“critical P concentrations were not clearly observed at 132 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At green maturity, absorbed P was mainly distributed to pods.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Organ / stage
podse0
Outcome
P absorbede0
Qualifier
green maturity stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the green maturity stage, P absorbed was mainly distributed to pods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After anthesis, leaf-to-pod and grain P translocation was higher at low than high P.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
low P levelse0
Outcome
P translocated from the leaves to the growing pods and grainse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
after anthesise0
Comparator
high P levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of P translocated from the leaves to the growing pods and grains was higher at low P levels than at high P levels after anthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1517 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–125 · show in text ↑

ph · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.