Paper · 1980 · Agronomy Journal

Close‐Grown Tobacco: Agronomic Characteristics, Total Alkaloid, and Sugar Content1

C. R. Campbell; J. F. Chaplin; W. H. Johnson; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The development of synthetic smoking materials has prompted researchers to consider non‐conventional production methods as a means of producing a low cost, flue‐cured tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.) material which might be used in the manufacture of cigarettes. In order to evaluate yield potential, chemical content, and physical characteristics of close‐grown tobacco, plants were grown in the field at populations of 45,448, 90,896, and 136,344/ha with different planting designs (twin or equidistant), nitrogen levels (84, 168, 252, and 336 kg/ha), and topping regimes (topping or no topping). The soil was a Durham loamy sand (fine loamy, siliceous, thermic, Typic Hapudult). The entire plant was flue‐cured and separated into lamina, midrib, and stalk for yield and chemical analysis. A wide range of yield, chemical content, and physical characteristics of the harvested material was produced by manipulating various cultural practices. Topped plants averaged 26% lamina, 12% midrib, and 62% stalk as compared to 19% lamina, 10% midrib, 54% stalk, and 17% top material for plants not topped. Yields increased progressively with N‐rate through 252 kg/ha and/or increased plant population. Twin or equidistant row spacing had no effect on yield. Topping decreased whole‐plant yield but increased the concentration of alkaloids and reducing sugars and the lamina: stalk ratio. Total alkaloids ranged from 0.18% for wholeplant nontopped tobacco receiving 84 kg N/ha to 0.84% for topped plants receiving 336 kg N/ha. Total reducing sugars averaged 8.0 for nontopped and 9.6% for topped plants. Results indicate that high yields can be obtained by utilizing the close‐grown production system and harvesting the entire plant. Desirable chemical content and physical characteristics of close‐grown tobacco might be obtained by manipulating cultural practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topped tobacco plants averaged 26% lamina.

Treatment
Toppede0
Outcome
laminae0
Value
26%e0
Qualifier
19% laminae0
Comparator
plants not toppede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topped plants averaged 26% lamina, 12% midrib, and 62% stalk as compared to 19% lamina, 10% midrib, 54% stalk, and 17% top material for plants not topped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topped plants averaged 12% midrib.

Outcome
midribe0
Value
12%e0
Qualifier
10% midribe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topped plants averaged 26% lamina, 12% midrib, and 62% stalk as compared to 19% lamina, 10% midrib, 54% stalk, and 17% top material for plants not topped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topped plants averaged 62% stalk.

Outcome
stalke0
Value
62%e0
Qualifier
54% stalke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topped plants averaged 26% lamina, 12% midrib, and 62% stalk as compared to 19% lamina, 10% midrib, 54% stalk, and 17% top material for plants not topped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untopped plants averaged 17% top material.

Outcome
top materiale0
Value
17%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“17% top material for plants not topped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco yield rose with nitrogen rate through 252 kg/ha.

Treatment
N‐ratee0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
252 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields increased progressively with N‐rate through 252 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco yield rose with plant population.

Treatment
increased plant populatione0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields increased progressively with N‐rate through 252 kg/ha and/or increased plant population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twin and equidistant row spacing had no yield effect.

Treatment
Twine0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no effecte0
Comparator
equidistant row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Twin or equidistant row spacing had no effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping decreased whole-plant tobacco yield.

Treatment
Toppinge0
Outcome
whole‐plant yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topping decreased whole‐plant yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping increased tobacco alkaloid and reducing sugar concentrations.

Treatment
Toppinge0
Outcome
concentration of alkaloids and reducing sugarse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topping decreased whole‐plant yield but increased the concentration of alkaloids and reducing sugars and the lamina: stalk ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topping increased the lamina-to-stalk ratio.

Treatment
Toppingt1
Outcome
lamina: stalk ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the concentration of alkaloids and reducing sugars and the lamina: stalk ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
t1

“Topping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1267 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total alkaloids ranged from 0.18% to 0.84% across tobacco treatments.

Outcome
Total alkaloidse0
Value
0.18%e0
Qualifier
0.84%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total alkaloids ranged from 0.18% for wholeplant nontopped tobacco receiving 84 kg N/ha to 0.84% for topped plants receiving 336 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1526 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total reducing sugars averaged 8.0 for nontopped plants.

Treatment
nontoppede0
Outcome
Total reducing sugarse0
Value
8.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total reducing sugars averaged 8.0 for nontopped and 9.6% for topped plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total reducing sugars averaged 9.6% for topped plants.

Treatment
toppede0
Outcome
Total reducing sugarse0
Value
9.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total reducing sugars averaged 8.0 for nontopped and 9.6% for topped plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High tobacco yields can be obtained with close-grown production and whole-plant harvest.

Treatment
close‐grown production system and harvesting the entire plante0
Outcome
high yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high yields can be obtained by utilizing the close‐grown production system and harvesting the entire plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1733 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–19 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cultural practices may be manipulated to obtain desirable tobacco chemistry and physical characteristics.

Treatment
manipulating cultural practicese0
Outcome
Desirable chemical content and physical characteristicse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Desirable chemical content and physical characteristics of close‐grown tobacco might be obtained by manipulating cultural practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1866 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

103 papers: 85 positive, 18 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

density · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

pruning · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.