Paper · 2006 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Hot air treatment decreases chlorophyll catabolism during postharvest senescence of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) heads

Maria L Costa; Pedro M Civello; Alicia R Chaves; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract A hot air treatment was applied to broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) florets and its effect on chlorophyll catabolism during postharvest senescence was analyzed. Florets were treated at 48 °C for 3 h and then placed in darkness at 20 °C. During storage, the yellowing of florets occurred simultaneously with a decrease in chlorophylls and an increase in pheophytins. Heat treatment delayed the appearance of yellowing by 2–3 days and a similar extension of shelf‐life could be inferred. Also, the treatment delayed the onset of chlorophyll catabolism and slowed both the rate of chlorophyll a degradation and pheophytin accumulation. No effect on chlorophyll b degradation was found. Chlorophyllase and Mg‐dechelatase activities increased from the first day of storage in untreated florets, whereas peroxidase‐linked chlorophyll bleaching activity increased from day 3. In heat‐treated florets, chlorophyllase activity did not increase until day 2 and then increased at lower rate than in controls. Mg‐dechelatase and peroxidase‐linked chlorophyll bleaching activities were similar in treated and control florets during the first 2 days of storage, but thereafter the activity of both enzymes was lower in heat‐treated samples. In conclusion, a treatment at 48 °C for 3 h delayed chlorophyll a catabolism in broccoli during postharvest senescence and decreased the activities of chlorophyllase, Mg‐dechelatase and peroxidase, three of the enzymes probably involved in chlorophyll degradation in plants. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli floret yellowing coincided with declining chlorophylls and increasing pheophytins.

Outcome
yellowing of floretse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yellowing of florets occurred simultaneously with a decrease in chlorophylls and an increase in pheophytins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–387 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat treatment delayed broccoli floret yellowing by 2–3 days.

Treatment
Heat treatmente0
Outcome
yellowinge0
Direction
delayede0
Value
2–3 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat treatment delayed the appearance of yellowing by 2–3 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat treatment delayed onset of chlorophyll catabolism in broccoli.

Treatment
the treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll catabolisme0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment delayed the onset of chlorophyll catabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat treatment slowed broccoli chlorophyll a degradation.

Outcome
rate of chlorophyll a degradatione0
Direction
slowede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slowed both the rate of chlorophyll a degradation and pheophytin accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat treatment slowed broccoli pheophytin accumulation.

Outcome
pheophytin accumulatione0
Direction
slowede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slowed both the rate of chlorophyll a degradation and pheophytin accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat treatment did not affect broccoli chlorophyll b degradation.

Outcome
chlorophyll b degradatione0
Direction
No effecte0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No effect on chlorophyll b degradation was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated florets showed increased chlorophyllase and Mg-dechelatase activities from the first storage day.

Outcome
Chlorophyllase and Mg‐dechelatase activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
untreated floretse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyllase and Mg‐dechelatase activities increased from the first day of storage in untreated florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated florets showed increased peroxidase-linked chlorophyll bleaching activity from day 3.

Outcome
peroxidase‐linked chlorophyll bleaching activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
day 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peroxidase‐linked chlorophyll bleaching activity increased from day 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat-treated florets had delayed and slower chlorophyllase activity increases than controls.

Outcome
chlorophyllase activitye0
Direction
lower ratee0
Qualifier
day 2e0
Comparator
controlse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyllase activity did not increase until day 2 and then increased at lower rate than in controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After two storage days, heat-treated florets had lower Mg-dechelatase and peroxidase-linked chlorophyll bleaching activities than controls.

Treatment
heat‐treated samplese0
Outcome
activity of both enzymese0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thereafter the activity of both enzymes was lower in heat‐treated samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–92 · show in text ↑

heat · physiology: enzyme activity · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

heat · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.