Paper · 2002 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

RESPONSES OF THE PHOTOSYNTHETIC APPARATUS TO ALUMINUM STRESS IN TWO SORGHUM CULTIVARS

H. P. Peixoto; Fabio M. Da Matta; Jose Cambraia Da Matta

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
91
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This work focused on the effects of aluminum (Al) stress on photosynthetic apparatus using Al-tolerant and sensitive cultivars of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Plants were grown in Clark's nutrient solution aerated continuously and adjusted daily to pH 4.0 and containing two Al concentrations (0 and 185 mmol m−3) supplied as Al2(SO4)3ċ18H2O. Measurements were performed on recently expanded leaves from the eighth to sixteenth day after imposing Al treatments. In general, chloroplastidic" pigment concentration, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, and photosynthetic rates were initially affected by Al stress to a greater extent in the Al-tolerant cultivar than in the susceptible cultivar. However, the Al-tolerant genotype seemed to cope with high Al via progressive, sustained decreases in initial chlorophyll fluorescence and increases in chlorophyll a/b ratio, photosystem II photochemical efficiency, net carbon assimilation rate, and photosynthetic oxygen evolution. In contrast, the Al-sensitive cultivar did not show any apparent acclimation response to high Al application. The results suggest that the harmful effects of Al on photosynthesis might be partially alleviated through time-dependent mechanisms, particularly in the Al-tolerant sorghum cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum initially affected pigments, chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis more in the tolerant than sensitive sorghum cultivar.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Material
Al-tolerant cultivare0
Treatment
Al stresse0
Outcome
pigment concentration, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, and photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
greater extente0
Comparator
susceptible cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chloroplastidic" pigment concentration, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, and photosynthetic rates were initially affected by Al stress to a greater extent in the Al-tolerant cultivar than in the susceptible cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–703 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tolerant cultivar progressively and sustainably decreased initial chlorophyll fluorescence under high Al.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Material
Al-tolerant genotypee0
Treatment
high Ale0
Outcome
initial chlorophyll fluorescencee0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Al-tolerant genotype seemed to cope with high Al via progressive, sustained decreases in initial chlorophyll fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–839 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high Al, the tolerant cultivar increased chlorophyll a/b ratio, PSII efficiency and carbon assimilation.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume2
Material
Al-tolerant genotypee1
Treatment
high Ale1
Outcome
chlorophyll a/b ratio, photosystem II photochemical efficiency, net carbon assimilation ratee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases in chlorophyll a/b ratio, photosystem II photochemical efficiency, net carbon assimilation rate, and photosynthetic oxygen evolution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–986 · show in text ↑
e1

“Al-tolerant genotype seemed to cope with high Al”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–766 · show in text ↑
e2

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high Al, the tolerant cultivar increased photosynthetic oxygen evolution.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume2
Material
Al-tolerant genotypee1
Treatment
high Ale1
Outcome
photosynthetic oxygen evolutione0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases in chlorophyll a/b ratio, photosystem II photochemical efficiency, net carbon assimilation rate, and photosynthetic oxygen evolution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–986 · show in text ↑
e1

“Al-tolerant genotype seemed to cope with high Al”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–766 · show in text ↑
e2

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The aluminum-sensitive cultivar showed no apparent acclimation to high Al.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Material
Al-sensitive cultivare0
Treatment
high Al applicatione0
Outcome
acclimation responsee0
Direction
did not showe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Al-sensitive cultivar did not show any apparent acclimation response to high Al application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1096 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–167 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggested time-dependent mechanisms may partly alleviate Al harm to photosynthesis, particularly in tolerant sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
harmful effects of Al on photosynthesise0
Qualifier
time-dependent mechanismse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harmful effects of Al on photosynthesis might be partially alleviated through time-dependent mechanisms, particularly in the Al-tolerant sorghum cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1280 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · physiology: photosynthesis · SorghumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.