Paper · 1992 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

>Aluminum toxicity effects on durum wheat cultivars

M. Moustakas; T. Yupsanis; L. Symeonidis; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effects of aluminum on biomass, nutrients and kinases were studied in two durum wheat cultivare (Triticum durum Desf. cvs Sapfo, Capeiti 82) grown in nutrient solutions (pH 4.5) at seven Al levels (0, 9.3, 18.5, 37.1, 74.1, 148, and 297 μM). The most evident Al toxicity symptom was a reduction in root growth. Sapfo showed greater Al tolerance than Capeiti 82. However, both cultivare must be characterized as Al‐sensitives. Aluminum in the nutrient solution above 74.1 μM significantly (P<0.05) reduced root growth of both durum wheat cultivare. The concentration of 74.1 μM Al can be suggested for screening of durum wheats on the basis of tolerance to Al. The concentrations of the nutrients Ca, Mg, K, and Fe in the plant tissues of both cultivare decreased even at low Al levels. The decrease of Ca+2 content in leaves and roots of the two durum wheat cultivare was almost the same while the less sensitive cultivar Sapfo retained larger amounts of Mg+2 in roots and leaves compared with the more sensitive cultivar Capeiti 82. Yet, Sapfo retained at 297 μM Al larger amounts of Fe in roots and leaves as a percentage of the control (‐A1) compared with Capeiti. The uptake of K+ in both cultivare tended to decrease under Al treatment. An indication is mentioned that protein kinases participate in plant responses to Al stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum toxicity reduced durum wheat root growth.

Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“The most evident Al toxicity symptom was a reduction in root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–322 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sapfo had greater aluminum tolerance than Capeiti 82.

Material
Sapfoe0
Outcome
Al tolerancee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Capeiti 82e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sapfo showed greater Al tolerance than Capeiti 82”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–373 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cultivars were characterized as aluminum sensitive.

Outcome
Al‐sensitivese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“both cultivare must be characterized as Al‐sensitives”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum above 74.1 μM significantly reduced root growth in both cultivars.

Treatment
Aluminum in the nutrient solution above 74.1 μMe0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Aluminum in the nutrient solution above 74.1 μM significantly (P<0.05) reduced root growth of both durum wheat cultivare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–559 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest 74.1 μM aluminum for screening durum wheat tolerance.

Outcome
screening of durum wheatse0
Value
74.1 μMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“The concentration of 74.1 μM Al can be suggested for screening of durum wheats on the basis of tolerance to Al”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue calcium, magnesium, potassium, and iron concentrations decreased even at low aluminum levels.

Organ / stage
plant tissuese0
Treatment
low Al levelse0
Outcome
concentrations of the nutrients Ca, Mg, K, and Fee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“The concentrations of the nutrients Ca, Mg, K, and Fe in the plant tissues of both cultivare decreased even at low Al levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–797 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium content decreased similarly in leaves and roots of both cultivars.

Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Outcome
Ca+2 contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“The decrease of Ca+2 content in leaves and roots of the two durum wheat cultivare was almost the same”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–900 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sapfo retained more magnesium in roots and leaves than Capeiti 82.

Material
Sapfoe0
Outcome
Mg+2 in roots and leavese0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
Capeiti 82e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“the less sensitive cultivar Sapfo retained larger amounts of Mg+2 in roots and leaves compared with the more sensitive cultivar Capeiti 82”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1045 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 297 μM aluminum, Sapfo retained more iron in roots and leaves relative to controls than Capeiti 82.

Material
Sapfoe0
Outcome
Fe in roots and leavese0
Direction
largere0
Qualifier
297 μM Ale0
Comparator
Capeitie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sapfo retained at 297 μM Al larger amounts of Fe in roots and leaves as a percentage of the control (‐A1) compared with Capeiti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium uptake tended to decrease with aluminum treatment in both cultivars.

Treatment
Al treatmente0
Outcome
uptake of K+e0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“The uptake of K+ in both cultivare tended to decrease under Al treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1253 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein kinases were suggested to participate in plant responses to aluminum stress.

Gene
protein kinasese0
Outcome
plant responses to Al stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“An indication is mentioned that protein kinases participate in plant responses to Al stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1346 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.