Abstract
ABSTRACT Results from three vegetable experiments using agriplastic mulch systems showed a positive relationship between the increase of rhizobacteria dynamics and the increased growth response (IGR) of vegetables grown on black plastic (BM) and clear plastic (CM) mulches with or without row covers during early spring and summer. In the first experiment, no significant differences were observed for IGR of ‘Flora-dade’ tomatoes grown on bare soil following soil solarization (SBS) and nonsolarized bare soil (BS) plus BM. However, tomatoes grown on SBS, BM and BM mulched SBS plus Reemay spunbonded polyester row cover treatment showed a greater IGR compared to the non-row cover treatments. In the second experiment, plots containing ‘Crimson Sweet’ watermelons grown on CM had higher soil temperature and IGR than those grown with BM with and without VisPore row cover. When TU-82-155 swectpotato cultivar was double cropped on CM and BM plots following the removal of mulching films, sweetpotatoes showed improved yield compared to those grown in BS. In the third experiment, watermelon transplants grown on CM and BM mulches with or without VisPore row cover that were applied 21 days prior to planting had higher IGR and bacteria population in root rhizosphere than transplants grown on agrimulch systems applied just one day prior to transplanting. In all studies, there were significant increases of rhizo-bacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissue of tomatoes and watermelons grown in solarized soil and all agrimulch systems compared to BS.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Across three vegetable experiments, rhizobacteria dynamics were positively related to the increased growth response (IGR) of vegetables grown on black and clear plastic mulches with or without row covers.
Verbatim
e0“showed a positive relationship between the increase of rhizobacteria dynamics and the increased growth response (IGR) of vegetables grown on black plastic (BM) and clear plastic (CM) mulches with or without row covers during early spring and summer”
Claim · model-written summary
IGR of Flora-dade tomatoes did not differ significantly between bare soil after solarization (SBS) and nonsolarized bare soil plus black mulch.
- Taxon
- tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Material
- Flora-dadee0
- Treatment
- bare soil following soil solarization (SBS)e0
- Outcome
- IGRe0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
- Comparator
- nonsolarized bare soil (BS) plus BMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“no significant differences were observed for IGR of ‘Flora-dade’ tomatoes grown on bare soil following soil solarization (SBS) and nonsolarized bare soil (BS) plus BM”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomatoes grown on SBS, BM and BM-mulched SBS with Reemay spunbonded polyester row cover showed greater IGR than the non-row cover treatments.
- Taxon
- tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- SBS, BM and BM mulched SBS plus Reemay spunbonded polyester row cover treatmente0
- Outcome
- IGRe0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- non-row cover treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“tomatoes grown on SBS, BM and BM mulched SBS plus Reemay spunbonded polyester row cover treatment showed a greater IGR compared to the non-row cover treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Crimson Sweet watermelons grown on clear plastic mulch had higher soil temperature and IGR than those grown with black plastic mulch with and without VisPore row cover.
- Taxon
- watermelons
Citrullus lanatuse0 - Material
- Crimson Sweete0
- Treatment
- CMe0
- Outcome
- soil temperature and IGRe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- BM with and without VisPore row covere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“plots containing ‘Crimson Sweet’ watermelons grown on CM had higher soil temperature and IGR than those grown with BM with and without VisPore row cover”
Claim · model-written summary
Sweetpotato TU-82-155 double cropped on CM and BM plots after removal of mulching films showed improved yield compared with sweetpotatoes grown in bare soil.
- Taxon
- sweetpotatoes
Ipomoea batatase0 - Material
- TU-82-155e0
- Treatment
- double cropped on CM and BM plots following the removal of mulching filmse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- BSe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“When TU-82-155 swectpotato cultivar was double cropped on CM and BM plots following the removal of mulching films, sweetpotatoes showed improved yield compared to those grown in BS”
Claim · model-written summary
Watermelon transplants grown on CM and BM mulches, with or without VisPore row cover, applied 21 days before planting had higher IGR and rhizosphere bacteria populations than transplants on agrimulch systems applied one day before transplanting.
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatuse0 - Treatment
- CM and BM mulches with or without VisPore row cover that were applied 21 days prior to plantinge0
- Outcome
- IGR and bacteria population in root rhizospheree0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- agrimulch systems applied just one day prior to transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“watermelon transplants grown on CM and BM mulches with or without VisPore row cover that were applied 21 days prior to planting had higher IGR and bacteria population in root rhizosphere than transplants grown on agrimulch systems applied just one day prior to transplanting”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomatoes grown in solarized soil and all agrimulch systems had significant increases of rhizobacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissue compared with bare soil.
- Taxon
- tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- solarized soil and all agrimulch systemse0
- Interactor
- rhizo-bacteriaHyphomicrobialese0other
- Outcome
- rhizo-bacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissuee0
- Direction
- significant increasese0
- Comparator
- BSe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“there were significant increases of rhizo-bacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissue of tomatoes and watermelons grown in solarized soil and all agrimulch systems compared to BS”
Claim · model-written summary
Watermelons grown in solarized soil and all agrimulch systems had significant increases of rhizobacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissue compared with bare soil.
- Taxon
- watermelons
Citrullus lanatuse0 - Treatment
- solarized soil and all agrimulch systemse0
- Interactor
- rhizo-bacteriaHyphomicrobialese0other
- Outcome
- rhizo-bacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissuee0
- Direction
- significant increasese0
- Comparator
- BSe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“there were significant increases of rhizo-bacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissue of tomatoes and watermelons grown in solarized soil and all agrimulch systems compared to BS”
The same questions in other papers
trap barrier · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →mulching · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →solarization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →mulching · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →mulching · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →trap barrier · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.