Paper · 2000 · Journal of Vegetable Crop Production

Evidence of Rhizobacteria Changes Associated with the Increased Growth Response of Vegetables Grown in Agrimulch Systems

Victor A. Khan; Clauzell Stevens; Mack A. Wilson; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Results from three vegetable experiments using agriplastic mulch systems showed a positive relationship between the increase of rhizobacteria dynamics and the increased growth response (IGR) of vegetables grown on black plastic (BM) and clear plastic (CM) mulches with or without row covers during early spring and summer. In the first experiment, no significant differences were observed for IGR of ‘Flora-dade’ tomatoes grown on bare soil following soil solarization (SBS) and nonsolarized bare soil (BS) plus BM. However, tomatoes grown on SBS, BM and BM mulched SBS plus Reemay spunbonded polyester row cover treatment showed a greater IGR compared to the non-row cover treatments. In the second experiment, plots containing ‘Crimson Sweet’ watermelons grown on CM had higher soil temperature and IGR than those grown with BM with and without VisPore row cover. When TU-82-155 swectpotato cultivar was double cropped on CM and BM plots following the removal of mulching films, sweetpotatoes showed improved yield compared to those grown in BS. In the third experiment, watermelon transplants grown on CM and BM mulches with or without VisPore row cover that were applied 21 days prior to planting had higher IGR and bacteria population in root rhizosphere than transplants grown on agrimulch systems applied just one day prior to transplanting. In all studies, there were significant increases of rhizo-bacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissue of tomatoes and watermelons grown in solarized soil and all agrimulch systems compared to BS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across three vegetable experiments, rhizobacteria dynamics were positively related to the increased growth response (IGR) of vegetables grown on black and clear plastic mulches with or without row covers.

Taxon
vegetablese0
Treatment
black plastic (BM) and clear plastic (CM) mulches with or without row coverse0
Interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0other
Outcome
increased growth response (IGR)e0
Direction
positive relationshipe0

Verbatim

e0

“showed a positive relationship between the increase of rhizobacteria dynamics and the increased growth response (IGR) of vegetables grown on black plastic (BM) and clear plastic (CM) mulches with or without row covers during early spring and summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 82–330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IGR of Flora-dade tomatoes did not differ significantly between bare soil after solarization (SBS) and nonsolarized bare soil plus black mulch.

Material
Flora-dadee0
Treatment
bare soil following soil solarization (SBS)e0
Outcome
IGRe0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
nonsolarized bare soil (BS) plus BMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences were observed for IGR of ‘Flora-dade’ tomatoes grown on bare soil following soil solarization (SBS) and nonsolarized bare soil (BS) plus BM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomatoes grown on SBS, BM and BM-mulched SBS with Reemay spunbonded polyester row cover showed greater IGR than the non-row cover treatments.

Treatment
SBS, BM and BM mulched SBS plus Reemay spunbonded polyester row cover treatmente0
Outcome
IGRe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
non-row cover treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomatoes grown on SBS, BM and BM mulched SBS plus Reemay spunbonded polyester row cover treatment showed a greater IGR compared to the non-row cover treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crimson Sweet watermelons grown on clear plastic mulch had higher soil temperature and IGR than those grown with black plastic mulch with and without VisPore row cover.

Taxon
watermelonsCitrullus lanatuse0
Material
Crimson Sweete0
Treatment
CMe0
Outcome
soil temperature and IGRe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
BM with and without VisPore row covere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plots containing ‘Crimson Sweet’ watermelons grown on CM had higher soil temperature and IGR than those grown with BM with and without VisPore row cover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweetpotato TU-82-155 double cropped on CM and BM plots after removal of mulching films showed improved yield compared with sweetpotatoes grown in bare soil.

Taxon
sweetpotatoesIpomoea batatase0
Material
TU-82-155e0
Treatment
double cropped on CM and BM plots following the removal of mulching filmse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
BSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When TU-82-155 swectpotato cultivar was double cropped on CM and BM plots following the removal of mulching films, sweetpotatoes showed improved yield compared to those grown in BS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelon transplants grown on CM and BM mulches, with or without VisPore row cover, applied 21 days before planting had higher IGR and rhizosphere bacteria populations than transplants on agrimulch systems applied one day before transplanting.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
CM and BM mulches with or without VisPore row cover that were applied 21 days prior to plantinge0
Outcome
IGR and bacteria population in root rhizospheree0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
agrimulch systems applied just one day prior to transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“watermelon transplants grown on CM and BM mulches with or without VisPore row cover that were applied 21 days prior to planting had higher IGR and bacteria population in root rhizosphere than transplants grown on agrimulch systems applied just one day prior to transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomatoes grown in solarized soil and all agrimulch systems had significant increases of rhizobacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissue compared with bare soil.

Treatment
solarized soil and all agrimulch systemse0
Interactor
rhizo-bacteriaHyphomicrobialese0other
Outcome
rhizo-bacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissuee0
Direction
significant increasese0
Comparator
BSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant increases of rhizo-bacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissue of tomatoes and watermelons grown in solarized soil and all agrimulch systems compared to BS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Watermelons grown in solarized soil and all agrimulch systems had significant increases of rhizobacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissue compared with bare soil.

Taxon
watermelonsCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
solarized soil and all agrimulch systemse0
Interactor
rhizo-bacteriaHyphomicrobialese0other
Outcome
rhizo-bacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissuee0
Direction
significant increasese0
Comparator
BSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant increases of rhizo-bacteria in the rhizoplane, rhizosphere and root interior tissue of tomatoes and watermelons grown in solarized soil and all agrimulch systems compared to BS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1573 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

mulching · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

73 papers: 62 positive, 11 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

solarization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

mulching · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
    SB-PF and PCP rowcovers generally had greater mean RGR, SLA and CGR than other listed covers or mulches.

    Growth Analysis of Watermelon Plants Grown with Mulches and Rowcovers · 1995 · compared with spunbonded polypropylene polyamide net (SB-PP), black plus clear combination plastic mulch and black plastic mulch alone

    Same direction

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

mulching · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

trap barrier · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.