Abstract
This thesis has listed rice as the research object, and by way of water treatment (water-saving treatment and CK treatment) and nitrogen-fertilizer treatment (N0, N1, N2, N3, N4), to analyze the effects of water and nitrogen fertilizer coupling on the yield and panicle architecture of rice. Results show that compared with CK, water-saving irrigation is more effective in promoting the yield. Under N-fertilizer treatment of N1, N2 and N3, the rice yield was increased by more than 10%; while under N0 and N4, the yield difference was not significant. With the increased apply of Nitrogen, under the two watering means, the yield both showed a tendency of firstly increase and later decrease. The yield hit the highest point in water-saving irrigation under N3, followed by water-saving irrigation under N2, and CK under N3.Under N2 and N3, the yield increased in water-saving irrigation was mainly contributed by the increase of the second rachis branches. The yield was increased by 30.69% and 30.37% under N2 and N3 separately. With water-saving irrigation, the yield under N3 is more than that under N2, this is mainly contributed by the increase of the grain number per panicle and the thousand seed weight. Under N3, the yield difference was not significant in either watering treatments, but water-saving irrigation has increased the average value of yield traits. Analysis of the panicle architecture has revealed that compared with CK, water-saving irrigation is more effective in increase the rice yield, which was mainly realized by the significant increase in the number of second rachis branches.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Water-saving irrigation was more effective than CK in increasing rice yield.
- Taxon
- Japonica Rice
Oryza sativa Japonica Groupt0 - Treatment
- water-saving irrigatione1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Comparator
- CKe1
- Setting
- Cold Areat0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_by_Augustus_Binu.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“Results show that compared with CK, water-saving irrigation is more effective in promoting the yield”
t0“Japonica Rice in Cold Area”
Claim · model-written summary
Under N1, N2 and N3 nitrogen fertilizer, rice yield increased by more than 10%.
- Taxon
- Japonica Rice
Oryza sativa Japonica Groupt0 - Treatment
- N-fertilizer treatment of N1, N2 and N3e1
- Outcome
- rice yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- more than 10%e1
- Setting
- Cold Areat0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_by_Augustus_Binu.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“Under N-fertilizer treatment of N1, N2 and N3, the rice yield was increased by more than 10%”
t0“Japonica Rice in Cold Area”
Claim · model-written summary
Under N0 and N4, the rice yield difference was not significant.
- Taxon
- Japonica Rice
Oryza sativa Japonica Groupt0 - Treatment
- N0 and N4e1
- Outcome
- yield differencee1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Setting
- Cold Areat0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_by_Augustus_Binu.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“while under N0 and N4, the yield difference was not significant”
t0“Japonica Rice in Cold Area”
Claim · model-written summary
With increasing nitrogen, rice yield first increased and then decreased under both watering means.
- Taxon
- Japonica Rice
Oryza sativa Japonica Groupt0 - Treatment
- increased apply of Nitrogene1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- firstly increase and later decreasee1
- Setting
- Cold Areat0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_by_Augustus_Binu.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“With the increased apply of Nitrogen, under the two watering means, the yield both showed a tendency of firstly increase and later decrease”
t0“Japonica Rice in Cold Area”
Claim · model-written summary
Water-saving irrigation under N3 gave the highest rice yield, followed by water-saving irrigation under N2 and then CK under N3.
- Taxon
- Japonica Rice
Oryza sativa Japonica Groupt0 - Treatment
- water-saving irrigation under N3e1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Qualifier
- followed by water-saving irrigation under N2, and CK under N3e1
- Setting
- Cold Areat0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_by_Augustus_Binu.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The yield hit the highest point in water-saving irrigation under N3, followed by water-saving irrigation under N2, and CK under N3”
t0“Japonica Rice in Cold Area”
Claim · model-written summary
Under N2 and N3, the yield increase under water-saving irrigation was mainly due to more second rachis branches.
- Taxon
- Japonica Rice
Oryza sativa Japonica Groupt0 - Treatment
- water-saving irrigatione1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Qualifier
- mainly contributed by the increase of the second rachis branchese1
- Setting
- Cold Areat0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_by_Augustus_Binu.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“Under N2 and N3, the yield increased in water-saving irrigation was mainly contributed by the increase of the second rachis branches”
t0“Japonica Rice in Cold Area”
Claim · model-written summary
Water-saving irrigation increased rice yield by 30.69% under N2.
- Taxon
- Japonica Rice
Oryza sativa Japonica Groupt0 - Treatment
- N2e1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 30.69%e1
- Setting
- Cold Areat0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_by_Augustus_Binu.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The yield was increased by 30.69% and 30.37% under N2 and N3 separately”
t0“Japonica Rice in Cold Area”
Claim · model-written summary
Water-saving irrigation increased rice yield by 30.37% under N3.
- Taxon
- Japonica Rice
Oryza sativa Japonica Groupt0 - Treatment
- N3e1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 30.37%e1
- Setting
- Cold Areat0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_by_Augustus_Binu.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The yield was increased by 30.69% and 30.37% under N2 and N3 separately”
t0“Japonica Rice in Cold Area”
Claim · model-written summary
With water-saving irrigation, rice yield under N3 exceeded that under N2, mainly through grain number per panicle and thousand seed weight.
- Taxon
- Japonica Rice
Oryza sativa Japonica Groupt0 - Treatment
- water-saving irrigatione1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- moree1
- Qualifier
- grain number per panicle and the thousand seed weighte1
- Comparator
- under N2e1
- Setting
- Cold Areat0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_by_Augustus_Binu.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“With water-saving irrigation, the yield under N3 is more than that under N2, this is mainly contributed by the increase of the grain number per panicle and the thousand seed weight”
t0“Japonica Rice in Cold Area”
Claim · model-written summary
Under N3, the rice yield difference between the two watering treatments was not significant.
- Taxon
- Japonica Rice
Oryza sativa Japonica Groupt0 - Treatment
- N3e1
- Outcome
- yield differencee1
- Qualifier
- in either watering treatmentse1
- Setting
- Cold Areat0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_by_Augustus_Binu.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“Under N3, the yield difference was not significant in either watering treatments”
t0“Japonica Rice in Cold Area”
Claim · model-written summary
Water-saving irrigation increased the average value of rice yield traits under N3.
- Taxon
- Japonica Rice
Oryza sativa Japonica Groupt0 - Treatment
- water-saving irrigatione1
- Outcome
- average value of yield traitse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- Cold Areat0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_by_Augustus_Binu.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“but water-saving irrigation has increased the average value of yield traits”
t0“Japonica Rice in Cold Area”
Claim · model-written summary
Compared with CK, water-saving irrigation significantly increased the number of second rachis branches in rice.
- Taxon
- Japonica Rice
Oryza sativa Japonica Groupt0 - Treatment
- water-saving irrigatione1
- Outcome
- number of second rachis branchese1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Comparator
- CKe1
- Setting
- Cold Areat0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_by_Augustus_Binu.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“compared with CK, water-saving irrigation is more effective in increase the rice yield, which was mainly realized by the significant increase in the number of second rachis branches”
t0“Japonica Rice in Cold Area”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
287 papers more in this group
See all 291 papers →irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
1,167 papers more in this group
See all 1,171 papers →nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
2,041 papers more in this group
See all 2,045 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.