Paper · 1994 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Dry‐matter production, mineral nutrient concentrations, and nutrient distribution and redistribution in irrigated spring wheat

P. J. Hocking

19
claims
36
verbatim quotes
133
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A field study was made of the seasonal changes in dry‐matter production, and the uptake, distribution, and redistribution of 12 mineral nutrients in the semi‐dwarf spring wheat, Egret, grown under typical irrigation farming conditions. Most of the dry‐matter production and nutrient uptake had occurred by anthesis, with 75–100% of the final content of magnesium (Mg), copper (Cu), chloride (Cl), sulfur (S), phosphorus (P), nitrogen (N), and potassium (K) being taken up in the pre‐anthesis period. The above‐ground dry‐matter harvest index was 37%, and grain made up 76% of the head dry matter. Redistributed dry matter from stems and leaves could have provided 29% of the grain dry matter. Concentrations of phloemmobile nutrients, such as N and P, decreased in the leaves and stems throughout the season, whereas concentrations of phloem‐immobile nutrients, such as calcium (Ca) and iron (Fe), generally increased. The decline in the N concentration in stems and leaves was not prevented by N fertilizer applied just before anthesis. Leaves had the major proportion of most nutrients in young plants, but stems had the major proportion of these nutrients at anthesis. Grain had over 70% of the N and P, and 31–64% of the Mg, manganese (Mn), S, and zinc (Zn), but less than 20% of the K, Ca, sodium (Na), Cl, and Fe in the plant. Over 70% of the N and P, and from 15 to 51% of the Mg, K, Cu, S, and Zn was apparently redistributed from stems and leaves to developing grain. There was negligible redistribution of Ca, Na, Cl, Fe, and Mn from vegetative organs. Redistribution from stems and leaves could have provided 100% of the K, 68–72% of the N and P, and 33–48% of the Zn, Cu, Mg, and S accumulated by grain. It was concluded that the distribution patterns of some key nutrients such as N, P, and K have not changed much in the transition from tall to semi‐dwarf wheats, and that the capacity of wheat to redistribute dry matter and nutrients to grain is a valuable trait when nutrient uptake is severely restricted in the post‐anthesis period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most dry matter production and nutrient uptake occurred before anthesis.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
dry‐matter production and nutrient uptakee0
Value
75–100%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the dry‐matter production and nutrient uptake had occurred by anthesis, with 75–100% of the final content of magnesium (Mg), copper (Cu), chloride (Cl), sulfur (S), phosphorus (P), nitrogen (N), and potassium (K) being taken up in the pre‐anthesis period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground dry matter harvest index was 37%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
above‐ground dry‐matter harvest indexe0
Value
37%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The above‐ground dry‐matter harvest index was 37%, and grain made up 76% of the head dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain contributed 76% of head dry matter.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
grain made upe0
Value
76%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The above‐ground dry‐matter harvest index was 37%, and grain made up 76% of the head dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redistributed stem and leaf dry matter could provide 29% of grain dry matter.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
grain dry mattere0
Value
29%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Redistributed dry matter from stems and leaves could have provided 29% of the grain dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and stem concentrations of phloem-mobile nutrients decreased over the season.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Concentrations of phloemmobile nutrientse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrations of phloemmobile nutrients, such as N and P, decreased in the leaves and stems throughout the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and stem concentrations of phloem-immobile nutrients generally increased.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
concentrations of phloem‐immobile nutrientse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of phloem‐immobile nutrients, such as calcium (Ca) and iron (Fe), generally increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer before anthesis did not prevent decline in leaf and stem nitrogen concentration.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N fertilizer applied just before anthesise0
Outcome
decline in the N concentration in stems and leavese0
Direction
not preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decline in the N concentration in stems and leaves was not prevented by N fertilizer applied just before anthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves held most nutrients in young plants while stems held most at anthesis.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
major proportion of most nutrientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves had the major proportion of most nutrients in young plants, but stems had the major proportion of these nutrients at anthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain held over 70% of plant nitrogen and phosphorus.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
N and Pe0
Value
over 70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain had over 70% of the N and P, and 31–64% of the Mg, manganese (Mn), S, and zinc (Zn), but less than 20% of the K, Ca, sodium (Na), Cl, and Fe in the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain held 31–64% of plant magnesium, manganese, sulfur and zinc.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Mg, manganese (Mn), S, and zinc (Zn)e0
Value
31–64%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain had over 70% of the N and P, and 31–64% of the Mg, manganese (Mn), S, and zinc (Zn), but less than 20% of the K, Ca, sodium (Na), Cl, and Fe in the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain held less than 20% of plant potassium, calcium, sodium, chloride and iron.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
K, Ca, sodium (Na), Cl, and Fee0
Value
less than 20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain had over 70% of the N and P, and 31–64% of the Mg, manganese (Mn), S, and zinc (Zn), but less than 20% of the K, Ca, sodium (Na), Cl, and Fe in the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Over 70% of nitrogen and phosphorus was apparently redistributed from stems and leaves to grain.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
N and Pe0
Value
Over 70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 70% of the N and P, and from 15 to 51% of the Mg, K, Cu, S, and Zn was apparently redistributed from stems and leaves to developing grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 15 to 51% of magnesium, potassium, copper, sulfur and zinc was apparently redistributed to grain.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Mg, K, Cu, S, and Zne0
Value
15 to 51%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 70% of the N and P, and from 15 to 51% of the Mg, K, Cu, S, and Zn was apparently redistributed from stems and leaves to developing grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium, sodium, chloride, iron and manganese showed negligible redistribution from vegetative organs.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
redistribution of Ca, Na, Cl, Fe, and Mne0
Direction
negligiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was negligible redistribution of Ca, Na, Cl, Fe, and Mn from vegetative organs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1571 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem and leaf redistribution could supply all potassium accumulated by grain.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Ke0
Value
100%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Redistribution from stems and leaves could have provided 100% of the K, 68–72% of the N and P, and 33–48% of the Zn, Cu, Mg, and S accumulated by grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1724 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem and leaf redistribution could supply 68–72% of grain nitrogen and phosphorus.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
N and Pe0
Value
68–72%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Redistribution from stems and leaves could have provided 100% of the K, 68–72% of the N and P, and 33–48% of the Zn, Cu, Mg, and S accumulated by grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1724 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem and leaf redistribution could supply 33–48% of grain zinc, copper, magnesium and sulfur.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Zn, Cu, Mg, and Se0
Value
33–48%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Redistribution from stems and leaves could have provided 100% of the K, 68–72% of the N and P, and 33–48% of the Zn, Cu, Mg, and S accumulated by grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1724 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Distribution patterns of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium changed little from tall to semidwarf wheat.

Taxon
wheatsTriticume0
Outcome
distribution patterns of some key nutrients such as N, P, and Ke0
Direction
not changed muche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“distribution patterns of some key nutrients such as N, P, and K have not changed much in the transition from tall to semi‐dwarf wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1885 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redistribution capacity was considered valuable when nutrient uptake after anthesis is restricted.

Outcome
capacity of wheat to redistribute dry matter and nutrients to graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the capacity of wheat to redistribute dry matter and nutrients to grain is a valuable trait when nutrient uptake is severely restricted in the post‐anthesis period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–2060 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 854 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.