Paper · 2009 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

PHENOLOGY, GROWTH, AND GRAIN YIELD OF MAIZE AS INFLUENCED BY FOLIAR APPLIED UREA AT DIFFERENT GROWTH STAGES

Amanullah; Muhammad Yasir; Shad Khan Khalil; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Foliar urea application is considered an important factor affecting phenology, growth, yield, and yield components of maize. A field experiment was conducted to study effects of urea spray on Azam variety of maize (Zea mays L.) in Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistan during 2005–06. The 5 × 4 factorial experiment was designed with five urea levels (U0 = control, U1 = 2, U2 = 4, U3 = 6 and U4 = 8% urea) applied to main plots and four application timings (T1 = at V9, T2 = V12, T3 = VT and T4 = R1 stages) assigned to subplots. Days to tasseling, silking, and maturity were delayed significantly when urea was applied at the rate of 6% and when applied at the V12 stage. Earlier tasseling, silking, and maturity were observed in urea control plots and in plots that received urea at the V9 stage. Plant height, leaf area, number of grains per cob and per line as well as (1000) grain weight, and grain and stover yields increased significantly up to the 6% urea level. Maize yield and yield components were higher when urea was applied at the V12 and VT stages than at the V9 and R1 stages. It is concluded that urea spray at the rate of 6% during the V12 stage would improve the grain yield and yield components of maize in the study area and contribute significantly to increased production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea applied at 6% delayed days to tasseling, silking and maturity of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
Azame0
Treatment
urea was applied at the rate of 6%e2
Outcome
Days to tasseling, silking, and maturitye2
Direction
delayede2
Setting
Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study effects of urea spray on Azam variety of maize (Zea mays L.) in Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistan during 2005–06”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–316 · show in text ↑
e2

“Days to tasseling, silking, and maturity were delayed significantly when urea was applied at the rate of 6% and when applied at the V12 stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea applied at the V12 stage delayed days to tasseling, silking and maturity of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
Azame0
Treatment
applied at the V12 stagee2
Outcome
Days to tasseling, silking, and maturitye2
Direction
delayede2
Setting
Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study effects of urea spray on Azam variety of maize (Zea mays L.) in Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistan during 2005–06”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–316 · show in text ↑
e2

“Days to tasseling, silking, and maturity were delayed significantly when urea was applied at the rate of 6% and when applied at the V12 stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–705 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tasseling, silking and maturity were earlier in urea control plots and in plots with urea at the V9 stage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
Azame0
Outcome
Earlier tasseling, silking, and maturitye3
Qualifier
in urea control plots and in plots that received urea at the V9 stagee3
Setting
Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study effects of urea spray on Azam variety of maize (Zea mays L.) in Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistan during 2005–06”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–316 · show in text ↑
e3

“Earlier tasseling, silking, and maturity were observed in urea control plots and in plots that received urea at the V9 stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea up to 6% increased plant height and leaf area of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
Azame0
Treatment
ureae1
Outcome
Plant height, leaf areae4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
up to the 6% urea levele4
Setting
Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study effects of urea spray on Azam variety of maize (Zea mays L.) in Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistan during 2005–06”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–316 · show in text ↑
e1

“five urea levels (U0 = control, U1 = 2, U2 = 4, U3 = 6 and U4 = 8% urea) applied to main plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–461 · show in text ↑
e4

“Plant height, leaf area, number of grains per cob and per line as well as (1000) grain weight, and grain and stover yields increased significantly up to the 6% urea level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea up to 6% increased grain numbers per cob and per line and 1000-grain weight of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
Azame0
Treatment
ureae1
Outcome
number of grains per cob and per line as well as (1000) grain weighte4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
up to the 6% urea levele4
Setting
Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study effects of urea spray on Azam variety of maize (Zea mays L.) in Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistan during 2005–06”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–316 · show in text ↑
e1

“five urea levels (U0 = control, U1 = 2, U2 = 4, U3 = 6 and U4 = 8% urea) applied to main plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–461 · show in text ↑
e4

“Plant height, leaf area, number of grains per cob and per line as well as (1000) grain weight, and grain and stover yields increased significantly up to the 6% urea level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea up to 6% increased grain and stover yields of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
Azame0
Treatment
ureae1
Outcome
grain and stover yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
up to the 6% urea levele4
Setting
Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study effects of urea spray on Azam variety of maize (Zea mays L.) in Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistan during 2005–06”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–316 · show in text ↑
e1

“five urea levels (U0 = control, U1 = 2, U2 = 4, U3 = 6 and U4 = 8% urea) applied to main plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–461 · show in text ↑
e4

“Plant height, leaf area, number of grains per cob and per line as well as (1000) grain weight, and grain and stover yields increased significantly up to the 6% urea level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield and yield components were higher with urea at the V12 and VT stages than at the V9 and R1 stages.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
Azame0
Treatment
urea was applied at the V12 and VT stagese5
Outcome
Maize yield and yield componentse5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
at the V9 and R1 stagese5
Setting
Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted to study effects of urea spray on Azam variety of maize (Zea mays L.) in Mardan district of the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) of Pakistan during 2005–06”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–316 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maize yield and yield components were higher when urea was applied at the V12 and VT stages than at the V9 and R1 stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1125 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Urea spray at 6% during the V12 stage is recommended to improve maize grain yield and yield components.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse6
Treatment
urea spray at the rate of 6% during the V12 stagee6
Outcome
grain yield and yield componentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“It is concluded that urea spray at the rate of 6% during the V12 stage would improve the grain yield and yield components of maize in the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1275 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

618 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Foliar nitrogen gave no greater corn yield response than the same amount as a side dressing.

    Foliar Feeding of Corn with Urea Nitrogen · 1953 · compared with the same amount of nitrogen applied as a side dressing

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.