Paper · 2010 · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of vermicompost as a potting amendment of two commercially-grown ornamental plant species

C. Lazcano; J. Dominguez

7
claims
22
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We evaluated the feasibility of incorporating vermicompost as a potting amendment into a commercial ornamental production system. Pansies (Viola × wittrockiana subsp. Delta) and primulas (Primula acaulis subsp. Oriental) were grown in peat-based conventional greenhouse medium substituted with 5%, 15% and 25% (v/v) commercial and pig slurry vermicompost. Vegetative growth and flowering were evaluated and compared to plants grown with 0% vermicompost. We observed a general reduction of growth in both species with increasing concentrations of commercial and pig slurry vermicompost. The highest percentage of vermicompost (25%) showed 20% of plant mortality, high levels of stress and damage to the photosynthetic apparatus, as well as a significant reduction in the number and biomass of leaves and in flower production. Most likely, the increase in electrical conductivity and pH interacted synergistically with the decrease in air space produced after the application of vermicompost and were magnified under sub-irrigation, causing the observed effects on plant growth. Therefore the cultivation system must be taken into account when incorporating vermicompost as a growing media constituent in commercial conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pansy growth was reduced as vermicompost concentration increased, compared with 0% vermicompost.

Taxon
Viola × wittrockianaViola ×wittrockianae1
Treatment
increasing concentrations of commercial and pig slurry vermicomposte0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
0% vermicomposte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Viola x wittrockiana
Viola ×wittrockiana · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Bossi · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We observed a general reduction of growth in both species with increasing concentrations of commercial and pig slurry vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–584 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pansies (Viola × wittrockiana subsp. Delta) and primulas (Primula acaulis subsp. Oriental) were grown in peat-based conventional greenhouse medium substituted with 5%, 15% and 25% (v/v) commercial and pig slurry vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–354 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to plants grown with 0% vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primula growth was reduced as vermicompost concentration increased, compared with 0% vermicompost.

Taxon
Primula acaulisPrimula vulgarise1
Treatment
increasing concentrations of commercial and pig slurry vermicomposte0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
0% vermicomposte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Primula vulgaris
Primula vulgaris · Taxonmattbuck ( category ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We observed a general reduction of growth in both species with increasing concentrations of commercial and pig slurry vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–584 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pansies (Viola × wittrockiana subsp. Delta) and primulas (Primula acaulis subsp. Oriental) were grown in peat-based conventional greenhouse medium substituted with 5%, 15% and 25% (v/v) commercial and pig slurry vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–354 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to plants grown with 0% vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest vermicompost rate (25%) caused about 20% plant mortality compared with 0% vermicompost.

Taxon
ornamental plant speciest0
Treatment
highest percentage of vermicompost (25%)e3
Outcome
plant mortalitye3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Value
20%e3
Comparator
0% vermicomposte2

Verbatim

t0

“two commercially-grown ornamental plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to plants grown with 0% vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–452 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest percentage of vermicompost (25%) showed 20% of plant mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest vermicompost rate (25%) significantly reduced the number and biomass of leaves.

Taxon
ornamental plant speciest0
Organ / stage
leavese4
Treatment
highest percentage of vermicompost (25%)e3
Outcome
number and biomass of leavese4
Direction
reductione4
Comparator
0% vermicomposte2

Verbatim

t0

“two commercially-grown ornamental plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to plants grown with 0% vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–452 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest percentage of vermicompost (25%) showed 20% of plant mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–660 · show in text ↑
e4

“a significant reduction in the number and biomass of leaves and in flower production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest vermicompost rate (25%) significantly reduced flower production.

Taxon
ornamental plant speciest0
Treatment
highest percentage of vermicompost (25%)e3
Outcome
flower productione4
Direction
reductione4
Comparator
0% vermicomposte2

Verbatim

t0

“two commercially-grown ornamental plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to plants grown with 0% vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–452 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest percentage of vermicompost (25%) showed 20% of plant mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–660 · show in text ↑
e4

“a significant reduction in the number and biomass of leaves and in flower production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–823 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Higher electrical conductivity and pH, together with less air space, likely caused the observed effects on plant growth.

Taxon
ornamental plant speciest0
Outcome
effects on plant growthe7
Qualifier
electrical conductivity and pHe5

Verbatim

t0

“two commercially-grown ornamental plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“the increase in electrical conductivity and pH interacted synergistically with the decrease in air space produced after the application of vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–989 · show in text ↑
e7

“causing the observed effects on plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1075 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivation system must be considered when incorporating vermicompost as a growing media constituent.

Taxon
ornamental plant speciest0
Outcome
incorporating vermicompost as a growing media constituente6

Verbatim

t0

“two commercially-grown ornamental plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–97 · show in text ↑
e6

“incorporating vermicompost as a growing media constituent in commercial conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1224 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Viola x wittrockianaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.