Paper · 1986 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Phytochrome Control of Specific mRNA levels in Developing Pea Buds

Lon S. Kaufman; Linda L. Roberts; Winslow R. Briggs; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
80
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

We have examined the time course for accumulation of each of 12 different nuclear gene transcripts in pea buds after irradiating dark grown seedlings with a single pulse low fluence red light (10(3) micromoles per square meter delivered in 100 seconds). The 12 time courses can be grouped into four general classes. Six transcripts (including RNAs coding for the chlorophyll a/b binding protein and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase) accumulate at a linear rate during 24 hours in darkness following the light pulse. Two transcripts increase rapidly at first but then reach a plateau after 3 hours and remain at that level for the next 21 hours. Another two transcripts exhibit a prolonged lag period before beginning to accumulate, and do not reach significant accumulation rates until 12 to 16 hours after the red light pulse. One transcript appears to undergo a transient increase in abundance in response to red light, but this is superimposed on a background of slowly increasing abundance of this RNA in control plants. This response, unlike all the others, exhibits reciprocity failure in experiments in which the same fluence of light is given over periods ranging between 50 and 4000 seconds.We have also examined the kinetics with which each of these 12 responses escapes from phytochrome-far-red absorbing form control by attempting to reverse the induction with far-red light given at various times after the red light pulse. Again, several different patterns are apparent for the different transcripts. The time at which far red reversibility first begins to be lost, the rate at which it is lost, and the final extent of reversibility remaining after 7 hours in the dark all differ for different transcripts. In addition, we have observed that some responses retain virtually complete photoreversibility for at least 7 hours. In some cases, a comparison of the time course and escape kinetic data indicates that relatively rapid turnover of the RNA must occur. It is not clear whether or not the rate of turnover is influenced by phytochrome.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six pea bud transcripts accumulated linearly for 24 hours after red light.

Organ / stage
Budst0
Outcome
transcriptse0
Direction
accumulatee0
Value
24 hourse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Developing Pea Buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Six transcripts (including RNAs coding for the chlorophyll a/b binding protein and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase) accumulate at a linear rate during 24 hours in darkness following the light pulse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–520 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two pea bud transcripts rose rapidly then plateaued after three hours.

Outcome
transcriptse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3 hourse0
Qualifier
remain at that level for the next 21 hourse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Developing Pea Buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two transcripts increase rapidly at first but then reach a plateau after 3 hours and remain at that level for the next 21 hours.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–649 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two pea bud transcripts showed a lag and did not accumulate significantly until 12 to 16 hours.

Outcome
transcriptse0
Direction
accumulatee0
Value
12 to 16 hourse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Developing Pea Buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Another two transcripts exhibit a prolonged lag period before beginning to accumulate, and do not reach significant accumulation rates until 12 to 16 hours after the red light pulse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One pea bud transcript showed a transient red-light increase against slowly rising control abundance.

Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
abundancee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Developing Pea Buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“One transcript appears to undergo a transient increase in abundance in response to red light, but this is superimposed on a background of slowly increasing abundance of this RNA in control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1029 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The transient pea bud transcript response showed reciprocity failure over 50 to 4000 second light deliveries.

Outcome
reciprocity failuree0
Qualifier
between 50 and 4000 secondse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Developing Pea Buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“This response, unlike all the others, exhibits reciprocity failure in experiments in which the same fluence of light is given over periods ranging between 50 and 4000 seconds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1205 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea bud transcripts differed in the onset, rate and extent of loss of far-red reversibility.

Outcome
far red reversibilitye0
Direction
differe0
Qualifier
after 7 hours in the darke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Developing Pea Buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“The time at which far red reversibility first begins to be lost, the rate at which it is lost, and the final extent of reversibility remaining after 7 hours in the dark all differ for different transcripts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1726 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some pea bud transcript responses retained virtually complete photoreversibility for at least seven hours.

Outcome
virtually complete photoreversibilitye0
Value
7 hourse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Developing Pea Buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“some responses retain virtually complete photoreversibility for at least 7 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1842 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Comparison of time courses and escape kinetics implied relatively rapid RNA turnover in some pea bud transcripts.

Outcome
relatively rapid turnover of the RNAe0
Qualifier
comparison of the time course and escape kinetic datae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Developing Pea Buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“In some cases, a comparison of the time course and escape kinetic data indicates that relatively rapid turnover of the RNA must occur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1844–1978 · show in text ↑

light · pest · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.