Paper · 2002 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Complexation of Imazalil with β-Cyclodextrin, Residue Uptake, Persistence, and Activity against Penicillium Decay in Citrus Fruit Following Postharvest Dip Treatments

Mario Schirra; Giovanna Delogu; Paolo Cabras; et al.

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
21
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A method for the inclusion of imazalil (IMZ) in the beta-cyclodextrin (betaCD), structural characterization of the inclusion complex and its antifungal activity against Penicillium digitatum and P. italicum assessed by in vitro and in vivo tests are reported. According to the starting stoichiometry of betaCD with respect to IMZ, an equimolar ratio beta-cyclodextrin-IMZ (betaCD-IMZ) was detected by (1)H NMR. In vitro assays showed that the freshly prepared betaCD-IMZ was as effective as IMZ, although 1- and 4-day-old betaCD-IMZ mixtures were more effective. Studies on Star Ruby grapefruit showed no significant differences in residue uptake between treatments with an IMZ commercially available fungicide (Deccozil) or betaCD-IMZ when equal active ingredient (a.i.) concentrations (250 mg/L) and dip temperatures (20 or 50 degrees C) were used. By contrast, treatments of Tarocco oranges and Di Massa lemons with 250 mg/L betaCD-IMZ at 50 degrees C produced significant differences in residue uptake in comparison with 250 mg/L Deccozil treatments at 50 degrees C. The a.i. degradation rate in grapefruit during postquarantine and simulated marketing period (SMP) at 20 degrees C was not affected by the type of formulation used, whether at 20 or 50 degrees C. Conversely, IMZ in oranges and lemons had greater persistence when applied at 50 degrees C. All fungicide treatments showed a comparable efficacy against decay in grapefruit and oranges, whereas treatment in lemons at 250 mg/L a.i. of heated fungicides had higher suppressive effects against decay than unheated chemicals having equal a.i. concentrations and comparable activity at 1200 mg/L IMZ at 20 degrees C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh betaCD-IMZ was as effective as IMZ in vitro.

Taxon
Citrus FruitCitrust0
Treatment
betaCD-IMZe0
Outcome
as effectivee0
Direction
as effectivee0
Comparator
IMZe0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“freshly prepared betaCD-IMZ was as effective as IMZ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Older betaCD-IMZ mixtures were more effective in vitro.

Taxon
Citrus FruitCitrust0
Treatment
1- and 4-day-old betaCD-IMZ mixturese0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1- and 4-day-old betaCD-IMZ mixtures were more effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grapefruit residue uptake did not differ between Deccozil and betaCD-IMZ.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisie0
Material
Star Rubye0
Treatment
betaCD-IMZe0
Outcome
residue uptakee0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Qualifier
20 or 50 degrees Ce0
Comparator
Deccozile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Studies on Star Ruby grapefruit showed no significant differences in residue uptake between treatments with an IMZ commercially available fungicide (Deccozil) or betaCD-IMZ when equal active ingredient (a.i.) concentrations (250 mg/L) and dip temperatures (20 or 50 degrees C) were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tarocco orange residue uptake differed between betaCD-IMZ and Deccozil at 50 degrees C.

Taxon
orangese0
Material
Taroccoe0
Treatment
250 mg/L betaCD-IMZ at 50 degrees Ce0
Outcome
residue uptakee0
Comparator
250 mg/L Deccozil treatments at 50 degrees Ce0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“treatments of Tarocco oranges and Di Massa lemons with 250 mg/L betaCD-IMZ at 50 degrees C produced significant differences in residue uptake in comparison with 250 mg/L Deccozil treatments at 50 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Di Massa lemon residue uptake differed between betaCD-IMZ and Deccozil at 50 degrees C.

Taxon
lemonsCitrus ×limone0
Material
Di Massae0
Treatment
250 mg/L betaCD-IMZ at 50 degrees Ce0
Outcome
residue uptakee0
Comparator
250 mg/L Deccozil treatments at 50 degrees Ce0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments of Tarocco oranges and Di Massa lemons with 250 mg/L betaCD-IMZ at 50 degrees C produced significant differences in residue uptake in comparison with 250 mg/L Deccozil treatments at 50 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grapefruit active ingredient degradation did not depend on formulation.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisie0
Treatment
type of formulation usede0
Outcome
a.i. degradation ratee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The a.i. degradation rate in grapefruit during postquarantine and simulated marketing period (SMP) at 20 degrees C was not affected by the type of formulation used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IMZ persisted more in oranges when applied at 50 degrees C.

Taxon
orangese0
Treatment
50 degrees Ce0
Outcome
IMZ in orangese0
Direction
greater persistencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“IMZ in oranges and lemons had greater persistence when applied at 50 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IMZ persisted more in lemons when applied at 50 degrees C.

Taxon
lemonsCitrus ×limone0
Treatment
50 degrees Ce0
Outcome
IMZ in oranges and lemonse0
Direction
greater persistencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IMZ in oranges and lemons had greater persistence when applied at 50 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1357 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatments had comparable decay efficacy in grapefruit and oranges.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisie0
Outcome
comparable efficacy against decaye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All fungicide treatments showed a comparable efficacy against decay in grapefruit and oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heated fungicide suppressed decay more than unheated fungicide in lemons.

Taxon
lemonsCitrus ×limone0
Treatment
heated fungicidese0
Outcome
suppressive effects against decaye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unheated chemicalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment in lemons at 250 mg/L a.i. of heated fungicides had higher suppressive effects against decay than unheated chemicals having equal a.i. concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1621 · show in text ↑

fungicide · disease · Citrus x limon (lemon)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.