Paper · 2000 · Agronomy Journal

Contour Grass Strips and Tillage Affect Corn Production on Philippine Steepland Oxisols

B. B. Thapa; D. P. Garrity; D. K. Cassel; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cultivated steeplands in the humid tropics require better soil management systems to meet increasing food demands. The objective of this 4‐yr study was to evaluate the following four contour soil management systems for corn ( Zea mays L.) production: (i) contour moldboard plowing (CP); (ii) ridge tillage (RT); (iii) natural grass barrier strips plus moldboard plowing (GCP); and (iv) grass strips plus ridge tillage (GRT). Eight successive corn crops were grown in limed and fertilized soil from 1992 through 1995. On a total land area basis (cropped area plus the area occupied by the grass strips), the 1995 mean grain yields for RT (10.8 Mg ha −1 ) and GRT (10.3 Mg ha −1 ) were significantly greater than yields for CP (10.0 Mg ha −1 ) and GCP (9.6 Mg ha −1 ). The corn grain yields for the CP and RT systems before 1995 ranged from 1.3 Mg ha −1 in 1992 to 8.4 Mg ha −1 in 1993, while comparable GCP and GRT yields ranged from 1.4 to 7.6 Mg ha −1 . Excluding the area occupied by the grass strips, the GRT system had the highest 4‐yr average corn yield (7.3 Mg ha −1 ) followed by the GCP (7.2 Mg ha −1 ), RT (6.9 Mg ha −1 ) and CP (6.7 Mg ha −1 ) systems. Yields improved during the 1994 and 1995 growing seasons when the grass was not permitted to grow as tall. The combination of contour ridge tillage and contour grass strips has potential for sustaining crop productivity on highly erodible steepland soils in the humid tropics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RT yielded 10.8 Mg per hectare in 1995, significantly above CP and GCP.

Treatment
RTe1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
significantly greatere1
Value
10.8 Mg ha −1e1
Comparator
CPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“the 1995 mean grain yields for RT (10.8 Mg ha −1 ) and GRT (10.3 Mg ha −1 ) were significantly greater than yields for CP (10.0 Mg ha −1 ) and GCP (9.6 Mg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GRT yielded 10.3 Mg per hectare in 1995, significantly above CP and GCP.

Treatment
GRTe1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
significantly greatere1
Value
10.3 Mg ha −1e1
Comparator
GCPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“the 1995 mean grain yields for RT (10.8 Mg ha −1 ) and GRT (10.3 Mg ha −1 ) were significantly greater than yields for CP (10.0 Mg ha −1 ) and GCP (9.6 Mg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–765 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CP grain yield ranged from 1.3 in 1992 to 8.4 Mg per hectare in 1993.

Treatment
CPe1
Outcome
corn grain yieldse1
Direction
rangede1
Value
1.3 Mg ha −1e1
Qualifier
to 8.4 Mg ha −1 in 1993e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“The corn grain yields for the CP and RT systems before 1995 ranged from 1.3 Mg ha −1 in 1992 to 8.4 Mg ha −1 in 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–883 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GCP and GRT grain yield before 1995 ranged from 1.4 to 7.6 Mg per hectare.

Outcome
GCP and GRT yieldse1
Direction
rangede1
Value
1.4 to 7.6 Mg ha −1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“comparable GCP and GRT yields ranged from 1.4 to 7.6 Mg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–952 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GRT had the highest four-year average yield excluding grass strip area, 7.3 Mg per hectare.

Treatment
GRTe1
Outcome
4‐yr average corn yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
7.3 Mg ha −1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“Excluding the area occupied by the grass strips, the GRT system had the highest 4‐yr average corn yield (7.3 Mg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1074 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GCP four-year average yield was 7.2 Mg per hectare.

Treatment
GCPe1
Outcome
GCPe1
Value
7.2 Mg ha −1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“followed by the GCP (7.2 Mg ha −1 ), RT (6.9 Mg ha −1 ) and CP (6.7 Mg ha −1 ) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RT four-year average yield was 6.9 Mg per hectare.

Treatment
RTe1
Outcome
RTe1
Value
6.9 Mg ha −1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“followed by the GCP (7.2 Mg ha −1 ), RT (6.9 Mg ha −1 ) and CP (6.7 Mg ha −1 ) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CP four-year average yield was 6.7 Mg per hectare.

Treatment
CPe1
Outcome
CPe1
Value
6.7 Mg ha −1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“followed by the GCP (7.2 Mg ha −1 ), RT (6.9 Mg ha −1 ) and CP (6.7 Mg ha −1 ) systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yields improved in 1994 and 1995 when grass height was limited.

Treatment
grass was not permitted to grow as talle1
Outcome
Yieldse1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yields improved during the 1994 and 1995 growing seasons when the grass was not permitted to grow as tall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1268 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose contour ridge tillage with grass strips to sustain crop productivity.

Outcome
combination of contour ridge tillage and contour grass stripse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn ( Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–238 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of contour ridge tillage and contour grass strips has potential for sustaining crop productivity on highly erodible steepland soils in the humid tropics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1438 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.