Paper · 1995 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Effects of light and atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment on photosynthesis and carbon partitioning in the leaves of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) plants over-expressing sucrose phosphate synthase

Nathalie Galtier; Christine H. Foyer; Erik Murchie; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
112
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Photosynthetic carbon assimilation, carbon partitioning and foliar carbon budgets were measured in the leaves of transformed tomato plants expressing a maize sucrose-phosphate synthase (SPS) gene in addition to the native enzyme, and in untransformed controls. The maize SPS gene was expressed under control of either the promoter of the small subunit of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcS promoter; lines 2, 9 and 18) or the 35S promoter from cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV promoter; line 13). The rate of sucrose synthesis was increased relative to that of starch and sucrose/starch ratios were higher throughout the photoperiod in the leaves of all plants expressing high SPS activity. The leaf carbon budget over the day/night cycle in air at low irradiance (180μmol photon m−2 s−1) was similar in all plants. Net photosynthesis measured in air and at elevated CO2 (800–1500 μl l−1) on whole plants grown in air at 400μmol m−2 s−1 irradiance was significantly increased in the high SPS expressors compared to the untransformed controls and was highest where SPS activity was greatest. At high CO2 the stimulation of photosynthesis was more pronounced. We conclude that SPS activity is a major point of control of photosynthesis particularly under saturating light and CO2.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-SPS tomato plants increased sucrose synthesis relative to starch.

Gene
sucrose phosphate synthaset1
Outcome
rate of sucrose synthesise0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
starche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of sucrose synthesis was increased relative to that of starch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–153 · show in text ↑
t1

“sucrose phosphate synthase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 177–203 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-SPS tomato leaves had higher sucrose to starch ratios throughout the photoperiod.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
sucrose/starch ratiose0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
throughout the photoperiode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sucrose/starch ratios were higher throughout the photoperiod in the leaves of all plants expressing high SPS activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–153 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf carbon budgets under low irradiance were similar in all tomato plants.

Outcome
leaf carbon budgete0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
low irradiance (180μmol photon m−2 s−1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf carbon budget over the day/night cycle in air at low irradiance (180μmol photon m−2 s−1) was similar in all plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthesis in air and elevated CO2 was significantly higher in high-SPS expressors than untransformed controls.

Treatment
high SPS expressorse0
Outcome
Net photosynthesise0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
elevated CO2 (800–1500 μl l−1)e0
Comparator
untransformed controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthesis measured in air and at elevated CO2 (800–1500 μl l−1) on whole plants grown in air at 400μmol m−2 s−1 irradiance was significantly increased in the high SPS expressors compared to the untransformed controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–153 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthesis was highest where SPS activity was greatest.

Gene
SPSe0
Outcome
Net photosynthesise1
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was highest where SPS activity was greatest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1105 · show in text ↑
e1

“Net photosynthesis measured in air and at elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 made the stimulation of photosynthesis more pronounced.

Treatment
high CO2e0
Outcome
stimulation of photosynthesise0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At high CO2 the stimulation of photosynthesis was more pronounced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–153 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that SPS activity controls photosynthesis especially under saturating light and CO2.

Gene
SPSe0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Qualifier
under saturating light and CO2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPS activity is a major point of control of photosynthesis particularly under saturating light and CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–153 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.