Paper · 1974 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Varietal response by sugar beet to nitrogen, sodium and potassium fertilizers

A. P. Draycott; G. E. Russell

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Three preliminary experiments at Cambridge (1904–70) indicated that several varieties and breeding lines of sugar beet differed in their response to fertilizers. Three factorial experiments were therefore made at Broom's Barn (1970–2) to measure response by four widely differing varieties of sugar beet (Sharpe's Klein ‘E’, Maris Vanguard, V.T.137 and Anglo-Maribo Poly) to nitrogen (0, 75 and 150kgN/ha), sodium (0 and 250 kg N/ha) and potassium (0 and 400 kg K/ha) fertilizers. Increases in sugar yield from 75 kg N/ha by each of the varieties were remarkably similar and giving a further 75 kg N/ha neither increased nor decreased the yield of any variety on average over the three experiments. The yield response to sodium and potassium was greatest in Sharpe's Klein ‘E’ and least in V.T.137; however, as with nitrogen, varieties responded inconsistently from year to year and the interactions were not statistically significant for data pooled over the three experiments. These experiments indicate that varietal differences in fertilizer requirement are unlikely to be important in commercial practice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet varieties and breeding lines differed in fertilizer responses in preliminary experiments.

Material
varieties and breeding linese0
Outcome
response to fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“several varieties and breeding lines of sugar beet differed in their response to fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An application of 75 kg N/ha increased sugar yield similarly across the varieties.

Treatment
75 kg N/hae0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
Increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in sugar yield from 75 kg N/ha by each of the varieties were remarkably similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–578 · show in text ↑
e1

“varieties of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A further 75 kg N/ha did not change mean sugar yield of any variety across the three experiments.

Treatment
further 75 kg N/hae0
Outcome
yield of any varietye0
Direction
neither increased nor decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“giving a further 75 kg N/ha neither increased nor decreased the yield of any variety on average over the three experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“varieties of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–311 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium yield response was greatest in Sharpe's Klein ‘E’ and least in V.T.137.

Material
Sharpe's Klein ‘E’e0
Outcome
yield response to sodiume0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
V.T.137e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield response to sodium and potassium was greatest in Sharpe's Klein ‘E’ and least in V.T.137”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–805 · show in text ↑
e1

“varieties of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–311 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium yield response was greatest in Sharpe's Klein ‘E’ and least in V.T.137.

Material
Sharpe's Klein ‘E’e0
Outcome
yield response to sodium and potassiume0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
V.T.137e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield response to sodium and potassium was greatest in Sharpe's Klein ‘E’ and least in V.T.137”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–805 · show in text ↑
e1

“varieties of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–311 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varietal responses to nitrogen, sodium and potassium varied inconsistently across years.

Outcome
responded inconsistently from year to yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“varieties responded inconsistently from year to year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“varieties of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–311 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pooled fertilizer-by-variety interactions were not statistically significant.

Outcome
interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interactions were not statistically significant for data pooled over the three experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“varieties of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–311 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that varietal fertilizer-requirement differences are unlikely to matter commercially.

Outcome
varietal differences in fertilizer requiremente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“varietal differences in fertilizer requirement are unlikely to be important in commercial practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“varieties of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–311 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 142 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.