Abstract
Row and mixed intercropping at 6:1 and 10:1 ratios along with the line sowing and broadcasting sole pigeonpea and rice-blackgram crop sequence were tested to evaluate the agro-economic productivity and advantages of intercropping over sole cropping. Grain yields of rice, blackgram and pigeonpea were affected by intercropping. Row intercropping of pigeonpea at 6:1 and 10:1 row ratio and mixed intercropping at 10:1 ratio gave significantly higher rice equivalent yield than sole pigeonpea and rice-blackgram crop sequence. High gross return, gross margin and benefit-cost ratio found the intercropping as a more profitable system. High land equivalent ratio and low competitive ratio by intercropping indicated its advantages over sole cropping.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping affected rice grain yield.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- Grain yields of ricee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yields of rice, blackgram and pigeonpea were affected by intercropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping affected blackgram grain yield.
- Taxon
- blackgram
Vigna mungoe0 - Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- Grain yieldse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yields of rice, blackgram and pigeonpea were affected by intercropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping affected pigeonpea grain yield.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0 - Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- Grain yieldse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yields of rice, blackgram and pigeonpea were affected by intercropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Row intercropping at a 6:1 ratio increased rice equivalent yield over sole crops.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- Row intercropping of pigeonpea at 6:1e0
- Outcome
- rice equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- sole pigeonpea and rice-blackgram crop sequencee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Row intercropping of pigeonpea at 6:1 and 10:1 row ratio and mixed intercropping at 10:1 ratio gave significantly higher rice equivalent yield than sole pigeonpea and rice-blackgram crop sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
Row intercropping at a 10:1 ratio increased rice equivalent yield over sole crops.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- Row intercropping of pigeonpea at 6:1 and 10:1 row ratioe0
- Outcome
- rice equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- sole pigeonpea and rice-blackgram crop sequencee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Row intercropping of pigeonpea at 6:1 and 10:1 row ratio and mixed intercropping at 10:1 ratio gave significantly higher rice equivalent yield than sole pigeonpea and rice-blackgram crop sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixed intercropping at a 10:1 ratio increased rice equivalent yield over sole crops.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- mixed intercropping at 10:1 ratioe0
- Outcome
- rice equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- sole pigeonpea and rice-blackgram crop sequencee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mixed intercropping at 10:1 ratio gave significantly higher rice equivalent yield than sole pigeonpea and rice-blackgram crop sequence”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping had high gross return, gross margin and benefit-cost ratio.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- gross return, gross margin and benefit-cost ratioe0
- Direction
- Highe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“High gross return, gross margin and benefit-cost ratio found the intercropping as a more profitable system”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping had high land equivalent ratio.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- land equivalent ratioe0
- Direction
- Highe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“High land equivalent ratio and low competitive ratio by intercropping indicated its advantages over sole cropping”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping had low competitive ratio.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- competitive ratioe0
- Direction
- lowe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“High land equivalent ratio and low competitive ratio by intercropping indicated its advantages over sole cropping”
t0“Pigeonpea”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ
93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
113 papers more in this group
See all 117 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.