Abstract
Soybean seeded [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] early into standing wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) using relay intercropping (RI) and seed‐coat technology may reduce mechanical damage and soybean interference to wheat. Field research at Novelty from 2003 to 2005 and Albany in 2004 evaluated effects of seed coat technology on wheat and soybean response, and gross profits of RI soybean using seed coat technology compared with selected full season (FS) wheat or soybean and double crop (DC) wheat‐soybean. Wheat grain yield in the absence of soybean was 10 bu/acre greater in narrow (7.5‐inch) than wide (15‐inch) rows. Relay intercropped Intellicoat (ITC) treated 5143 soybean delayed germination and increased 15‐inch wheat grain yields 8 bu/acre compared to non‐coated (NC) 5143. At Novelty, RI 5143 ITC yield was similar in all three years and 7 bu/acre greater at Albany than 5143 NC. In 2005, dry conditions in mid‐ to late June reduced RI stands and yields compared to DC soybean at Novelty. Double‐cropped 5143 NC soybean had greater gross profits than RI 5143 ITC when wheat and soybean prices were high. However, RI 5143 ITC gross profits were greater when soybean prices were high and wheat prices were low. The RI system using ITC maintained soybean yields and did not reduce wheat yields due to mechanical damage or soybean interference compared to non‐coated or fungicide‐only coating.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
In the absence of soybean, wheat grain yield was 10 bu/acre greater in narrow (7.5-inch) than in wide (15-inch) rows.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- narrow (7.5‐inch)e0
- Outcome
- Wheat grain yielde0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Value
- 10 bu/acree0
- Comparator
- wide (15‐inch) rowse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Wheat grain yield in the absence of soybean was 10 bu/acre greater in narrow (7.5‐inch) than wide (15‐inch) rows”
Claim · model-written summary
Relay intercropped Intellicoat-treated 5143 soybean delayed germination compared with non-coated 5143.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- Intellicoat (ITC) treated 5143e0
- Outcome
- germinatione0
- Direction
- delayede0
- Comparator
- non‐coated (NC) 5143e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Relay intercropped Intellicoat (ITC) treated 5143 soybean delayed germination and increased 15‐inch wheat grain yields 8 bu/acre compared to non‐coated (NC) 5143”
Claim · model-written summary
Relay intercropped Intellicoat-treated 5143 soybean increased 15-inch wheat grain yields by 8 bu/acre compared with non-coated 5143.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Intellicoat (ITC) treated 5143e0
- Outcome
- 15‐inch wheat grain yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 8 bu/acree0
- Comparator
- non‐coated (NC) 5143e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Relay intercropped Intellicoat (ITC) treated 5143 soybean delayed germination and increased 15‐inch wheat grain yields 8 bu/acre compared to non‐coated (NC) 5143”
Claim · model-written summary
At Novelty, relay intercropped 5143 ITC soybean yield was similar in all three years.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Outcome
- yielde0
- Qualifier
- similar in all three yearse0
- Setting
- Noveltye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“At Novelty, RI 5143 ITC yield was similar in all three years and 7 bu/acre greater at Albany than 5143 NC”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
At Albany, relay intercropped 5143 ITC soybean yield was 7 bu/acre greater than 5143 NC.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- RI 5143 ITCe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Value
- 7 bu/acree0
- Comparator
- 5143 NCe0
- Setting
- Albanye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“At Novelty, RI 5143 ITC yield was similar in all three years and 7 bu/acre greater at Albany than 5143 NC”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2005 at Novelty, dry conditions in mid- to late June reduced relay intercropped soybean stands and yields compared with double-crop soybean.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- dry conditions in mid‐ to late Junee0
- Outcome
- RI stands and yieldse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- DC soybeane0
- Setting
- Noveltye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In 2005, dry conditions in mid‐ to late June reduced RI stands and yields compared to DC soybean at Novelty”
Claim · model-written summary
Double-cropped 5143 NC soybean had greater gross profits than relay intercropped 5143 ITC when wheat and soybean prices were high.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- Double‐cropped 5143 NC soybeane0
- Outcome
- gross profitse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- when wheat and soybean prices were highe0
- Comparator
- RI 5143 ITCe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Double‐cropped 5143 NC soybean had greater gross profits than RI 5143 ITC when wheat and soybean prices were high”
Claim · model-written summary
Relay intercropped 5143 ITC gross profits were greater when soybean prices were high and wheat prices were low.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- RI 5143 ITCe0
- Outcome
- gross profitse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- when soybean prices were high and wheat prices were lowe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“However, RI 5143 ITC gross profits were greater when soybean prices were high and wheat prices were low”
Claim · model-written summary
The relay intercrop system using ITC maintained soybean yields compared with non-coated or fungicide-only coating.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- RI system using ITCe0
- Outcome
- soybean yieldse0
- Direction
- maintainede0
- Comparator
- non‐coated or fungicide‐only coatinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The RI system using ITC maintained soybean yields and did not reduce wheat yields due to mechanical damage or soybean interference compared to non‐coated or fungicide‐only coating”
Claim · model-written summary
The relay intercrop system using ITC did not reduce wheat yields from mechanical damage or soybean interference compared with non-coated or fungicide-only coating.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- RI system using ITCe0
- Outcome
- wheat yieldse0
- Direction
- did not reducee0
- Comparator
- non‐coated or fungicide‐only coatinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The RI system using ITC maintained soybean yields and did not reduce wheat yields due to mechanical damage or soybean interference compared to non‐coated or fungicide‐only coating”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
185 papers more in this group
See all 189 papers →drought · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
210 papers more in this group
See all 214 papers →intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
214 papers more in this group
See all 218 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.