Paper · 2010 · Crop Management

Seed Coat Technology Affects Yields of Relay Intercrop, Full Season, and Double Crop Soybean in Upstate Missouri

Kelly A. Nelson; Randall L. Smoot; Bruce A. Burdick

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soybean seeded [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] early into standing wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) using relay intercropping (RI) and seed‐coat technology may reduce mechanical damage and soybean interference to wheat. Field research at Novelty from 2003 to 2005 and Albany in 2004 evaluated effects of seed coat technology on wheat and soybean response, and gross profits of RI soybean using seed coat technology compared with selected full season (FS) wheat or soybean and double crop (DC) wheat‐soybean. Wheat grain yield in the absence of soybean was 10 bu/acre greater in narrow (7.5‐inch) than wide (15‐inch) rows. Relay intercropped Intellicoat (ITC) treated 5143 soybean delayed germination and increased 15‐inch wheat grain yields 8 bu/acre compared to non‐coated (NC) 5143. At Novelty, RI 5143 ITC yield was similar in all three years and 7 bu/acre greater at Albany than 5143 NC. In 2005, dry conditions in mid‐ to late June reduced RI stands and yields compared to DC soybean at Novelty. Double‐cropped 5143 NC soybean had greater gross profits than RI 5143 ITC when wheat and soybean prices were high. However, RI 5143 ITC gross profits were greater when soybean prices were high and wheat prices were low. The RI system using ITC maintained soybean yields and did not reduce wheat yields due to mechanical damage or soybean interference compared to non‐coated or fungicide‐only coating.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the absence of soybean, wheat grain yield was 10 bu/acre greater in narrow (7.5-inch) than in wide (15-inch) rows.

Treatment
narrow (7.5‐inch)e0
Outcome
Wheat grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
10 bu/acree0
Comparator
wide (15‐inch) rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grain yield in the absence of soybean was 10 bu/acre greater in narrow (7.5‐inch) than wide (15‐inch) rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relay intercropped Intellicoat-treated 5143 soybean delayed germination compared with non-coated 5143.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Intellicoat (ITC) treated 5143e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
non‐coated (NC) 5143e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relay intercropped Intellicoat (ITC) treated 5143 soybean delayed germination and increased 15‐inch wheat grain yields 8 bu/acre compared to non‐coated (NC) 5143”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relay intercropped Intellicoat-treated 5143 soybean increased 15-inch wheat grain yields by 8 bu/acre compared with non-coated 5143.

Treatment
Intellicoat (ITC) treated 5143e0
Outcome
15‐inch wheat grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8 bu/acree0
Comparator
non‐coated (NC) 5143e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relay intercropped Intellicoat (ITC) treated 5143 soybean delayed germination and increased 15‐inch wheat grain yields 8 bu/acre compared to non‐coated (NC) 5143”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–773 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Novelty, relay intercropped 5143 ITC soybean yield was similar in all three years.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
yielde0
Qualifier
similar in all three yearse0
Setting
Noveltye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Novelty, RI 5143 ITC yield was similar in all three years and 7 bu/acre greater at Albany than 5143 NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Albany, relay intercropped 5143 ITC soybean yield was 7 bu/acre greater than 5143 NC.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
RI 5143 ITCe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
7 bu/acree0
Comparator
5143 NCe0
Setting
Albanye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Novelty, RI 5143 ITC yield was similar in all three years and 7 bu/acre greater at Albany than 5143 NC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2005 at Novelty, dry conditions in mid- to late June reduced relay intercropped soybean stands and yields compared with double-crop soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
dry conditions in mid‐ to late Junee0
Outcome
RI stands and yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
DC soybeane0
Setting
Noveltye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2005, dry conditions in mid‐ to late June reduced RI stands and yields compared to DC soybean at Novelty”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double-cropped 5143 NC soybean had greater gross profits than relay intercropped 5143 ITC when wheat and soybean prices were high.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Double‐cropped 5143 NC soybeane0
Outcome
gross profitse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
when wheat and soybean prices were highe0
Comparator
RI 5143 ITCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Double‐cropped 5143 NC soybean had greater gross profits than RI 5143 ITC when wheat and soybean prices were high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relay intercropped 5143 ITC gross profits were greater when soybean prices were high and wheat prices were low.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
RI 5143 ITCe0
Outcome
gross profitse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
when soybean prices were high and wheat prices were lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, RI 5143 ITC gross profits were greater when soybean prices were high and wheat prices were low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relay intercrop system using ITC maintained soybean yields compared with non-coated or fungicide-only coating.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
RI system using ITCe0
Outcome
soybean yieldse0
Direction
maintainede0
Comparator
non‐coated or fungicide‐only coatinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RI system using ITC maintained soybean yields and did not reduce wheat yields due to mechanical damage or soybean interference compared to non‐coated or fungicide‐only coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relay intercrop system using ITC did not reduce wheat yields from mechanical damage or soybean interference compared with non-coated or fungicide-only coating.

Treatment
RI system using ITCe0
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Direction
did not reducee0
Comparator
non‐coated or fungicide‐only coatinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RI system using ITC maintained soybean yields and did not reduce wheat yields due to mechanical damage or soybean interference compared to non‐coated or fungicide‐only coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1390 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

189 papers: 131 positive, 58 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 131 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

drought · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 35 positive, 179 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

intercropping · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

218 papers: 131 positive, 87 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
    Intercropped soybeans yielded 72% of monocropped soybeans.

    Relay Intercropping Soybeans into Wheat in Kansas · 1990 · compared with monocropped soybeans

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

214 papers more in this group

See all 218 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.