Paper · 2004 · Plant Production Science

Crop Production in Successive Wheat-Soybean Rotation with No-Tillage Practice in Relation to the Root System Development

Yasuhiro Izumi; Kazuhito Uchida; Morio Iijima

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
39
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To elucidate the effect of no-tillage practice on the root system development and productivity in a wheat-soybean rotation system in Japan, we continuously cultivated these crops under tilled and non-tilled field conditions and compared the growth and yield for three years. Effect of presence or absence of tillage on the root growth was evaluated by the quantitative analysis for the root systems obtained by the core sampling method. The total shoot biomass and yield of wheat were significantly higher in the tilled field than in the non-tilled field in the first and second seasons, whereas, they were significantly higher in the non-tilled field in the third season. On the other hand, no significant difference between the tilled and non-tilled field was found in the soybean yield for the three seasons. Root length per unit area had a significant positive correlation with both the total shoot biomass and yield in wheat but not in soybean. The continuous no-tillage practice improved the soil condition for root development and resulted in an enhancement of the shoot growth and yield of wheat. In soybean, on the other hand, the root system development greatly fluctuated from season to season, especially, in the non-tilled field, but the productivity in the non-tilled field was relatively stable equivalent to that in the tilled field. Thus, stable production equivalent to that obtained by conventional tillage can be achieved by the no-tillage practice in a typical Japanese climate regardless of the fluctuation in root system development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoot biomass and yield were higher under tillage in seasons one and two.

Treatment
tilled fielde0
Outcome
total shoot biomass and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
first and second seasonse0
Comparator
non-tilled fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total shoot biomass and yield of wheat were significantly higher in the tilled field than in the non-tilled field in the first and second seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoot biomass and yield were higher without tillage in the third season.

Treatment
non-tilled fielde0
Outcome
shoot biomass and yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
third seasone0
Comparator
tilled fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total shoot biomass and yield of wheat were significantly higher in the tilled field than in the non-tilled field in the first and second seasons, whereas, they were significantly higher in the non-tilled field in the third season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield did not differ significantly between tillage treatments across three seasons.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
non-tilled fielde0
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Qualifier
three seasonse0
Comparator
tillede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference between the tilled and non-tilled field was found in the soybean yield for the three seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–810 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat root length per area correlated positively with shoot biomass and yield.

Organ / stage
Roote0
Outcome
total shoot biomass and yielde0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root length per unit area had a significant positive correlation with both the total shoot biomass and yield in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–929 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean root length per area was not significantly correlated with biomass and yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Organ / stage
Roote0
Outcome
total shoot biomass and yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root length per unit area had a significant positive correlation with both the total shoot biomass and yield in wheat but not in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous no-tillage improved soil conditions for wheat root development and enhanced shoot growth and yield.

Treatment
continuous no-tillage practicee0
Outcome
shoot growth and yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The continuous no-tillage practice improved the soil condition for root development and resulted in an enhancement of the shoot growth and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean root development fluctuated strongly across seasons, especially without tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
root system developmente0
Setting
non-tilled fielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root system development greatly fluctuated from season to season, especially, in the non-tilled field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat-Soybean Rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean productivity without tillage remained relatively stable and equivalent to tilled conditions.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
non-tilled fielde0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
tilled fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the productivity in the non-tilled field was relatively stable equivalent to that in the tilled field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat-Soybean Rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–52 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude no-tillage can achieve stable production equivalent to conventional tillage in a typical Japanese climate.

Treatment
no-tillage practicee0
Outcome
stable production equivalent to that obtained by conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stable production equivalent to that obtained by conventional tillage can be achieved by the no-tillage practice in a typical Japanese climate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat-Soybean Rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–52 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.