Paper · 2005 · Physiologia Plantarum

Role of transpiration from fruits in phloem transport and fruit growth in tomato fruits

Saneyuki Kawabata; Haruka Sasaki; Ryozo Sakiyama

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sink activity of fruits had been suggested to vary depending on transpiration of fruits. In this study, the effect of transpiration on dry matter accumulation was evaluated in tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Fruits of cv. Saturn at 14 days after anthesis were enclosed in chambers and aerated with dried (<15% RH) or moistened (>90% RH) air. These treatments did not cause any significant differences in fruit fresh weight, dry weight, percentage of dry matter, and concentration of soluble sugars within 5 days of the treatment, or the import of 14 C within 18 h after the application of 14 CO 2 to the source leaves. However, displacement transducer measurement of each fruit showed a 40% reduction in growth rate in response to exchange of moistened air with dried air. When fruits of cv. Momotaro were exposed to transpiration treatments from the beginning of visible fruit enlargement until the ripening stage, the fruits exhibited 20% reduction in growth and lower accumulation of dry matter at harvest following treatment with dried air. These results suggested that higher transpiration reduced both water accumulation and dry matter accumulation. In contrast, when fruit growth was mechanically restricted by enclosing the fruits in a chamber packed with glass beads, and dried or moistened air was passed through the spaces between the glass beads, fruits exhibited higher dry matter accumulation under dried air treatment conditions. The results show that only under artificial conditions would transpiration of fruits potentially drive carbohydrate transport; it does not serve as a limiting step of carbohydrate transport to tomato fruits under normal circumstances.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry and moist air did not significantly differ in fruit fresh weight, dry weight, dry matter percentage, or soluble sugar concentration over five days.

Treatment
These treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit fresh weight, dry weight, percentage of dry matter, and concentration of soluble sugarse0
Direction
did not cause any significant differencese0
Comparator
dried (<15% RH) or moistened (>90% RH) aire1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments did not cause any significant differences in fruit fresh weight, dry weight, percentage of dry matter, and concentration of soluble sugars within 5 days of the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits of cv. Saturn at 14 days after anthesis were enclosed in chambers and aerated with dried (<15% RH) or moistened (>90% RH) air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry and moist air did not significantly differ in carbon import within 18 h.

Treatment
dried (<15% RH) or moistened (>90% RH) aire1
Outcome
import of 14 Ce0
Comparator
moistened (>90% RH) aire1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“or the import of 14 C within 18 h after the application of 14 CO 2 to the source leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits of cv. Saturn at 14 days after anthesis were enclosed in chambers and aerated with dried (<15% RH) or moistened (>90% RH) air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing from moist to dry air reduced fruit growth rate by 40%.

Treatment
dried aire0
Outcome
growth ratee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
moistened aire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 40% reduction in growth rate in response to exchange of moistened air with dried air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer dry air exposure reduced Momotaro fruit growth by 20%.

Material
cv. Momotaroe1
Treatment
dried aire0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
moistened (>90% RH) aire2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fruits exhibited 20% reduction in growth and lower accumulation of dry matter at harvest following treatment with dried air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“When fruits of cv. Momotaro were exposed to transpiration treatments from the beginning of visible fruit enlargement until the ripening stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–923 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruits of cv. Saturn at 14 days after anthesis were enclosed in chambers and aerated with dried (<15% RH) or moistened (>90% RH) air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer dry air exposure lowered fruit dry matter accumulation at harvest.

Material
cv. Momotaroe1
Treatment
dried aire0
Outcome
accumulation of dry mattere0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
moistened (>90% RH) aire2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower accumulation of dry matter at harvest following treatment with dried air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“When fruits of cv. Momotaro were exposed to transpiration treatments from the beginning of visible fruit enlargement until the ripening stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–923 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruits of cv. Saturn at 14 days after anthesis were enclosed in chambers and aerated with dried (<15% RH) or moistened (>90% RH) air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With mechanically restricted growth, dry air increased fruit dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
dried air treatment conditionse0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
mechanically restrictede2
Comparator
moistened (>90% RH) aire1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits exhibited higher dry matter accumulation under dried air treatment conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits of cv. Saturn at 14 days after anthesis were enclosed in chambers and aerated with dried (<15% RH) or moistened (>90% RH) air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–349 · show in text ↑
e2

“when fruit growth was mechanically restricted by enclosing the fruits in a chamber packed with glass beads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1284 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude transpiration does not normally limit carbohydrate transport to tomato fruit.

Outcome
limiting step of carbohydrate transporte0
Qualifier
under normal circumstancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it does not serve as a limiting step of carbohydrate transport to tomato fruits under normal circumstances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1687 · show in text ↑

processing · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

processing · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.